Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,510
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

February 15-MOrch possible wintry threats


tombo82685

Recommended Posts

Friday of next week looks more interesting in my view. 

 

Next weekend might be the last really good shot at a solid winter storm for the season if the warm signal for March is to be believed.  Obviously could snow later into March but in terms of getting an equal opportunity storm, that might be the last really solid shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 929
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Also, let me just, for the sake of hype (lol), say this:

If the NAO can become more defined than what, say, the GFS portrays, I am prepared to up the probability of a KU storm in our area. At this time, I am holding the idea from yesterday and still favoring something "sub KU levels" for our area but notable/significant (like a 6-12" type of snow).

Between the next set of Pac waves and NAO, there is definitely a chance this entire things trends more south and east initially before it jumps to the coast.

 

As advertised nice shift SE last night's guidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next weekend might be the last really good shot at a solid winter storm for the season if the warm signal for March is to be believed.  Obviously could snow later into March but in terms of getting an equal opportunity storm, that might be the last really solid shot.

 

Models are indicating that the storm chances continue after next weekends storm. The D10 Euro ensemble shows a split flow with an active southern stream. GEFS are similar and continue the pattern well beyond D10 with a nice west based -NAO developing. 

post-1201-0-70304000-1360934270_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you like the pattern for a storm at the end of next week?

Yes...you have blocking, a nice high in place with a 50/50 low. If there is a storm i would favor frozen based on those aspects. Keep in the back of your mind that their are ways it may not work out. For instance, the block weakens and it cuts and redevelops to late for us. Or that it gets sheared out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes...you have blocking, a nice high in place with a 50/50 low. If there is a storm i would favor frozen based on those aspects. Keep in the back of your mind that their are ways it may not work out. For instance, the block weakens and it cuts and redevelops to late for us. Or that it gets sheared out.

 

With the 12z models yesterday honking for a storm and now 60F outside and NOTHING for this weekend, I just can't buy into a solid threat next weekend, whether its at hour 176 or 216. Even with the modeling of a +PNA, west-based -NAO and -AO. Then there's the absolute fantasy snowmeggedon at Hr 384.

 

With this Winter.....Can almost hear the faint tones of Don Meredith from Monday Night Football back in the day....."Turn out the lights....the party's over......"

 

Should be an interesting severe weather season. Bring it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Friday will shift south on the models, maybe similar to an event a few weeks ago that tried to cut into an arctic airmass. Modeling seven days out had it cut into Canada then there was even a danger that system would go to far south as time got closer. we'll see. 

the 12z euro brought it further south than sheared it. Va and dc get a nice evnt, but the precip is meh looking as it gets here. Pretty much a 1-3 ordeal with the 2-3 out towards lns and mdt. The day 10 euro has a nice storm, but that's way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the 12z euro brought it further south than sheared it. Va and dc get a nice evnt, but the precip is meh looking as it gets here. Pretty much a 1-3 ordeal with the 2-3 out towards lns and mdt. The day 10 euro has a nice storm, but that's way out.

It seems like it's always 7-10 days out and then falls apart, hopefully things turn around, at least Adam and HM have been on board for something next weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Models have been somewhat consistent with next Friday's storm threat. Solid HP to put some CAD in place that will allow for some front-end snow and/or sleet and freezing rain. It's generally looking like a good snow will depend on when and where a secondary low develops after the primary low over the Midwest occludes and weakens. The GFS Op+Ens gets the secondary low cranking faster and further north, which allows for the wetter solution compared to the Euro Op+Ens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question about the "always ten days out" phenomenon. For the mets -- is this actually a tendency of the models -- are they prone to developing vortices / LP systems as an artifact of the the model physics behind the models, especially in the long range when the model output is furthest removed in time from the obervational data -- or is this just a perception. That is, we focus on the vortices in the modeling and somehow exaggerate their frequency as compared to reality.

 

Not sure I'm making myself clear, but I guess I am asking about whether there is model feedback such that the long range always has more whopping storms than reality ever does...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models will always do spurious things as you get out in time. All that matters is that we have a legitimate -NAO to contend with which increases the threat for wintry weather 2/21-2/26. Anything sliding under this feature will have the potential to produce snowfall in the Mid Atlantic.

Analogs are not overwhelming for something major but there are a few decent years showing up (see other thread). It is always an interesting thing when the AJ retreats but leaves behind a bunch of eddies / sufficient cold air for snow (sort of like spring wavelengths with winter cold). You can get some very awesome setups with blocking like this. Of course, there were plenty of boring results, too, in past years with somewhat similar patterns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both the GFS and Euro look like they are trending a little but colder at 850 for the Tuesday system. Surface temps are still above freezing so possibly looking at freezing rain/wintry mix. In my forecast yesterday I had western PA in the freezing rain, so may have to adjust it a little further east if this continues to be the trend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both the GFS and Euro look like they are trending a little but colder at 850 for the Tuesday system. Surface temps are still above freezing so possibly looking at freezing rain/wintry mix. In my forecast yesterday I had western PA in the freezing rain, so may have to adjust it a little further east if this continues to be the trend. 

Start times may impact ptypes as well? I thought I read models showing differences in start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a potential problem with the friday potential. Note the GFS ensembles H5 pattern progged below; it seems to be a situation similar to late dec in which we had an ineffective "blocking ridge" in central-eastern Canada, but this ridge was not strong or expansive enough across the NATL to really suppress the baroclinic zone.

This height anomaly forecast is slightly concerning b/c we see the SE Ridge "hooking up" with the Canadian mid level ridge like we saw earlier this winter. So although we've got a great 50/50 low and some ridging in Canada, it's not true blocking if the height anomaly fields link up from Florida northward to Canada. This could allow the primary low to cut very far north as current models are depicting, though a secondary would eventually have to develop, it might not be far enough south to do us much good.

We'll have to monitor this situation, but if this occurs it basically goes along with the theme of the winter. So close, yet so far. Another ineffective ridge that classifies as a technical -NAO. Maybe we'll change this situation after the 20th.

The MJO pulse through 7-8-1 did manage to produce a monster snowstorm on the 8th of feb, a light even this past Wed, and a mdt event for eastern New England right now. The MJO will be cycling through phases 4-5 over the next 7 days, which should promote a retrogression of the mean trough axis into the Rockies for the time being. This coincides w/ the current forecast of heights falling in the West, rising in the East, making the Friday event an unlikely producer of meaningful snow.

I think our next real window of opportunity for snow accumulation greater than an inch or two is probably the last week of February into the first week of March. Will have to see if the MJO cuts through the COD and propagates back into the more favorable octants by D 5-8, at which time we could see another 1-2 week pulse of snow chances like we just came out of. But as it stands, the friday potential doesn't look great to me.

elcpe9.gif

ogc4g8.gif
 

  •  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a potential problem with the friday potential. Note the GFS ensembles H5 pattern progged below; it seems to be a situation similar to late dec in which we had an ineffective "blocking ridge" in central-eastern Canada, but this ridge was not strong or expansive enough across the NATL to really suppress the baroclinic zone.

This height anomaly forecast is slightly concerning b/c we see the SE Ridge "hooking up" with the Canadian mid level ridge like we saw earlier this winter. So although we've got a great 50/50 low and some ridging in Canada, it's not true blocking if the height anomaly fields link up from Florida northward to Canada. This could allow the primary low to cut very far north as current models are depicting, though a secondary would eventually have to develop, it might not be far enough south to do us much good.

We'll have to monitor this situation, but if this occurs it basically goes along with the theme of the winter. So close, yet so far. Another ineffective ridge that classifies as a technical -NAO. Maybe we'll change this situation after the 20th.

The MJO pulse through 7-8-1 did manage to produce a monster snowstorm on the 8th of feb, a light even this past Wed, and a mdt event for eastern New England right now. The MJO will be cycling through phases 4-5 over the next 7 days, which should promote a retrogression of the mean trough axis into the Rockies for the time being. This coincides w/ the current forecast of heights falling in the West, rising in the East, making the Friday event an unlikely producer of meaningful snow.

I think our next real window of opportunity for snow accumulation greater than an inch or two is probably the last week of February into the first week of March. Will have to see if the MJO cuts through the COD and propagates back into the more favorable octants by D 5-8, at which time we could see another 1-2 week pulse of snow chances like we just came out of. But as it stands, the friday potential doesn't look great to me.

elcpe9.gif

 

  •  

What also doesn't help is when that storm does cut towards the lakes it just rots underneath that block. The constant sw winds just warms the mid levels and screws things up for the next storm as currently modeled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What also doesn't help is when that storm does cut towards the lakes it just rots underneath that block. The constant sw winds just warms the mid levels and screws things up for the next storm as currently modeled.

 

FWIW, I havent looked at much past Tuesday's system, so this is just a generic thought.  If one was to go by the Archambault thesis, based on the GEFS NAO Outlook, it would be sometime around March 1st.  Looks like the MJO "would" be in the COD so less of a downer.  The latitudional track of the secondary the GFS has for Fri/Sat is at least consistent with the NAO being negative and not changing much toward the end of the week. 

 

I'll still golf for it on Thu if I can get over this cold I'm getting by then, somehow my record has remained intact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...