Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    EWR757
    Newest Member
    EWR757
    Joined

The last thread didn't work - upcoming threats discussion


TalcottWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Skier', it is true the NAO relaxed and this cutter was poorly timed, but the whole game isn't decided on one play, is a metaphor I'd like to employ. Fact remains, a month's worth of synoptic systems in general suffered suppression nearing our lat/log due to the suppressive might of the -NAO.

Litch', I am detached - I'm frustrated at the -NAO band wagon, not the weather. As I said, I'm about to drop off for the evening and I really won't care at all.

Will, respectfully and whole-heartedly disagree with you. This is statistical fact my friend; -NAO modes do not snow proficiently; the storms come at the bookends of both the positive and negative intervals. You will DEFINITELY find more success when the EPO is negative and the PNA delivers cold and amplitude potentials in tandem with a neutral NAO, or an NAO on the move.

People - it is time to dismiss the myth get with the science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skier', it is true the NAO relaxed and this cutter was poorly timed, but the whole game isn't decided on one play, is a metaphor I'd like to employ. Fact remains, a month's worth of synoptic systems in general suffered suppression nearing our lat/log due to the suppressive might of the -NAO.

Litch', I am detached - I'm frustrated at the -NAO band wagon, not the weather. As I said, I'm about to drop off for the evening and I really won't care at all.

Will, respectfully and whole-heartedly disagree with you. This is statistical fact my friend; -NAO modes do not snow proficiently; the storms come at the bookends of both the positive and negative intervals. You will DEFINITELY find more success when the EPO is negative and the PNA delivers cold and amplitude potentials in tandem with a neutral NAO, or an NAO on the move.

People - it is time to dismiss the myth get with the science.

I think your science book is either outdated or you're reading it upside down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only it becomes an NYC blizzard..lol and screws sne.

Right now as long as it shows a blizzard for someone.

I agree with John about the -NAO myth. Just because we have a -NAO does not mean we have storm on the coast. The Blizzard of 2005 is a great example of this, where the NAO was positive but was shifting towards neutral and negative levels. The +PNA was the biggest factor, especially since it was associated with the northern jet stream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Skier', it is true the NAO relaxed and this cutter was poorly timed, but the whole game isn't decided on one play, is a metaphor I'd like to employ. Fact remains, a month's worth of synoptic systems in general suffered suppression nearing our lat/log due to the suppressive might of the -NAO.

Litch', I am detached - I'm frustrated at the -NAO band wagon, not the weather. As I said, I'm about to drop off for the evening and I really won't care at all.

Will, respectfully and whole-heartedly disagree with you. This is statistical fact my friend; -NAO modes do not snow proficiently; the storms come at the bookends of both the positive and negative intervals. You will DEFINITELY find more success when the EPO is negative and the PNA delivers cold and amplitude potentials in tandem with a neutral NAO, or an NAO on the move.

People - it is time to dismiss the myth get with the science.

then what does it mean when the AO is tanking with a -NAO consistently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're off your rocker dude....we'd torch to death without that block with the current/upcoming PAC set up....we've had plenty of good systems with a strong NAO block.

Don't jump from the rafters yet.

I am surprised someone with his knowledge is letting one winter skew the entire history of blockbuster -NAO winters, its about negative amplitude and placement. Anyone who takes a GFS OP run and jumps off the Tobin deserves the consequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised someone with his knowledge is letting one winter skew the entire history of blockbuster -NAO winters, its about negative amplitude and placement. Anyone who takes a GFS OP run and jumps off the Tobin deserves the consequences.

We are truly in uncharted territory given the Mod/Strong Nina and the -AO/NAO couplet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, did take one last peek before heading out ...

Ginx,

I am not letting x do anything to y in this. And, I am not wrong - those blockbuster years you speak of, you have to look at each storm discretely and the behavior of the NOA mode lead up to, during and as the storm was exiting - you're not understanding this apparently.

Everyone else, the Euro is onto its 5th cycle with extended range system - though of course it has varied on details, duh. But, this is a different regime during that period of time than anything we have encountered over the last month; namely, the PNAP (Perennial North American Pattern) is in place. It will be interesting to see if the NAO weakens some prior to this arriving along the OV, and then restrengthens as it comes (see Feb 1978, 2nd - 6th). This 12z scenario is of similar ilk in that PV subsumes a southern stream impulse ....phasing along the MA.

Gotta run for real now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will, respectfully and whole-heartedly disagree with you. This is statistical fact my friend; -NAO modes do not snow proficiently; the storms come at the bookends of both the positive and negative intervals. You will DEFINITELY find more success when the EPO is negative and the PNA delivers cold and amplitude potentials in tandem with a neutral NAO, or an NAO on the move.

People - it is time to dismiss the myth get with the science.

Thank you. The Pacific continues to look horrible, so I'm skeptical of the -NAO delivering anything. The -NAO was horrible to New England last winter, and this winter has been a total joke so far with a -NAO/-AO.

then what does it mean when the AO is tanking with a -NAO consistently

It means that we have a huge ridge over Greenland and the North Pole that isn't doing sh*t to get us snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. The Pacific continues to look horrible, so I'm skeptical of the -NAO delivering anything. The -NAO was horrible to New England last winter, and this winter has been a total joke so far with a -NAO/-AO.

It means that we have a huge ridge over Greenland and the North Pole that isn't doing sh*t to get us snow.

With all due respect zukeeee the euro just gave you three feet of snow, your negativity sucks ass, seriuosly dude let it go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

January will rock. I've taken several steps back over the past few days. Enjoyed a milder 2 hours outdoors this morning while still not the torch that frisbee'ers revel in. I forgot my cell but had I brought it I would have taken photos of the smooth ice ponds in and around the Muddy River. I saw children walking on it and it easily supported their weight though parents wouldn't let them venture beyond the edge (smart!). I expect snow to be on the ground in some quantity certainly by cob Friday.

I noticed that ice fishing season has started here. Several lakes had guys out and on Onota Lake there was one guy rippin' around on a quad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like we have two choices this year: 1.) Negative NAO and dry/cold, or 2.) torch.

I guess #1 is better because the ski areas can make snow and I get an occasional few inches from the lakes... But that's cheap fake snow....I want a synoptic event.

You're off your rocker dude....we'd torch to death without that block with the current/upcoming PAC set up....we've had plenty of good systems with a strong NAO block.

Don't jump from the rafters yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect zukeeee the euro just gave you three feet of snow, your negativity sucks ass, seriuosly dude let it go.

I'm not negative just objective...people on here keep saying "The next storm is the one", "3-6 Monday" and all the rest of this garbage without anything to back it up. Where is the snow? Most of SNE is sitting on a trace or a couple tenths for the season and the next serious threat is at Day 9-10. Sounds as if my approach has been realistic so far.

And honestly, who cares what the ECM shows at Day 10? That storm doesn't even look possible, definitely not the synoptics I'd want for a NYC blizzard. Model threats don't get important until they come into the 6-7 day range, this is just fantasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect zukeeee the euro just gave you three feet of snow, your negativity sucks ass, seriuosly dude let it go.

LOL, Every one is so down. Can't wait for the flatlanders to get some snow. Hopefully it put the whining to an end. It's getting regoddamndiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not negative just objective...people on here keep saying "The next storm is the one", "3-6 Monday" and all the rest of this garbage without anything to back it up. Where is the snow? Most of SNE is sitting on a trace or a couple tenths for the season and the next serious threat is at Day 9-10. Sounds as if my approach has been realistic so far.

And honestly, who cares what the ECM shows at Day 10? That storm doesn't even look possible, definitely not the synoptics I'd want for a NYC blizzard. Model threats don't get important until they come into the 6-7 day range, this is just fantasy.

Clearly it is possible.. in fact likely in such a pattern.. given models have been showing some version of this storm the last 2 days. It's also not D9-10.. it's D8-9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not negative just objective...people on here keep saying "The next storm is the one", "3-6 Monday" and all the rest of this garbage without anything to back it up. Where is the snow? Most of SNE is sitting on a trace or a couple tenths for the season and the next serious threat is at Day 9-10. Sounds as if my approach has been realistic so far.

And honestly, who cares what the ECM shows at Day 10? That storm doesn't even look possible, definitely not the synoptics I'd want for a NYC blizzard. Model threats don't get important until they come into the 6-7 day range, this is just fantasy.

Zuk, its december 11th, would do you expect for dobbs ferry ny? LOL, kids were skating on a local pond this morning, the back bays and harbor in southport here on long island sound have ice on them and we are like minus a million after a +10 on Dec 1st. Not really sure what you are talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...