Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. haha I mean I am Gen Z. just turned 25 anyway this season does look bad. don't see how this is anything but active. if not hyper
  2. will beryl rizz up livvy dunne in Ohio? will she mog baby gronk? would be skibidi
  3. last winter also could have ended much differently if that mid-Feb storm did indeed produce that huge wave breaking -NAO that was advertised by every model at range. easy to forget that as well... that was a complete modeling disaster. probably the worst i've seen
  4. only a matter of time until we see positive regression to the mean. a lot of us forget how prolific the 2000s and 2010s were since we were living through them. the 70s and 80s were way more futile than this stretch NYC had ONE winter over 30" between 1969-70 and 1992-93, which was 1977-78. one! could you imagine now? people would be jumping from rooftops. yes, there were less complete duds and it was colder overall, but I will take the duds if it means more 40"+ winters
  5. btw, this absolutely could be a high ACE Atlantic hurricane season. could even be hyperactive. CSU's hurricane forecast is pretty dire
  6. the only reason it's even a consideration is because it was a moderate Nina (three trimonthlies of -1.0) that came off of a moderate Nino and it has some similarities in the Atlantic for this summer and autumn. it's not weighted high, and there's no reason why any analog should be completely discounted at this range when it's a similar ENSO state. I don't even expect a snowy winter. it'll probably be AN temps and BN snow for the east also, anyone that's certain about how strong the Nina is going to be and how it'll configure itself is fooling themselves. it isn't even June yet
  7. 1988-89, 1995-96, 1998-99, 2005-06, 2010-11, 2019-20, and 2020-21 are all fine analogs for now IMO. no real way to know which are better than others at this point given that we don't even know how the Nina is going to evolve at this point for the record, I am not expecting a good winter for the East. however, the two things that can help are a bit of Nino lag (helped in 95-96 and 2010-11 most notably) and high ACE, both of which likely have some kind of impact. we can just as easily see another dud, which is safer to expect the rubber band does have to snap back at some point... positive regression to the mean is pretty much imminent. would be ironic if we do see one of the good Nina winters in a year where people are expecting so little
  8. trough on the EPS is deeper with stronger blocking
  9. you have an anomalous -NAO breaking down over the Davis Strait and a 50/50 in place, it’s a really good pattern for a significant storm. and the trough is showing up as low as -3 to -4 sigma on OP runs. climo starts to mean less when you’re dealing with that level of deviation from the mean someone is going to get crushed. I would feel a lot better if I was in Boston
  10. and the trough is showing up as low as -3 to -4 sigma on OP runs. climo starts to mean less when you’re dealing with that level of deviation from the mean
  11. you have an anomalous -NAO breaking down over the Davis Strait and a 50/50 in place, it’s a really good pattern for a significant storm
  12. verbatim, some pretty stout cross polar flow develops. again, I would like to see it get closer, but it would work
  13. IF the TPV gets displaced like some of the OP runs have shown, I'll buy it. big if for now, but with the ongoing SSW and Pacific wave breaking, it is a possibility. would be silly to totally dismiss it
  14. hell, even 1998 had a late season event followed by a week of 80s. it was NYC's only snow of the winter
  15. IF there were to be a weird late season event, this would be the pattern needed to get it done
  16. IF there were to be a weird late season event, this would be the pattern needed to get it done
  17. lol. if there was to be a dumb late season event, this would be the pattern you’d need to pull it off
  18. this ain’t bad… blocked flow to the north, a 50/50 in place, and strong HP to the north to allow colder air to drain in. again, something to keep an eye on, especially away from the immediate coast
  19. if this was Jan, i’d probably can the risk, but March is stupid and this could easily just cut off and dump
  20. i would like to see more of a cutoff signature, as AN heights over Nova Scotia usually aren’t the best for late season storms. however, teleconnections aren’t quite as useful as they are in mid-Jan due to shorter wavelengths. there’s also some nice HP to the north. something to watch, but I would lower expectations given a lack of ample cold air
  21. i would like to see more of a cutoff signature, as AN heights over Nova Scotia usually aren’t the best for late season storms. however, teleconnections aren’t quite as useful as they are in mid-Jan due to shorter wavelengths. there’s also some nice HP to the north. something to watch, but I would lower expectations given a lack of ample cold air
  22. for reference, this MECS occurred four days afterwards. lmao
  23. oh yeah? this you? @Allsnow must have been nice digging out from 18” and then 6” over the next two weeks
×
×
  • Create New...