Jump to content

olafminesaw

Members
  • Posts

    3,746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by olafminesaw

  1. First is the upcoming threat. The second image is last Sunday's storm at a similar range
  2. Well, we have our answer, dry air such as this can't completely sublimate falling snow
  3. I fear any east coast bombs that develop this year will inevitably take on a dreaded messy miller b track.
  4. Also, starting to see some banding on the northern fringe show up on the hires models. Wouldn't be surprised to get nothing hardly any snow, except for one band that moves through, dropping a quick half inch
  5. The 17z HRRR move the moisture inland more rapidly. Starts to blossom along the coast at around 5 pm
  6. They've done a great job with this storm, given the hand they've been dealt.
  7. The hires NAM reflectivity map looks great, but the precip map shows zero in the Triad. Will be fascinating to see how this plays out.
  8. Some notes for the Triad The trends east on the last few runs of the HRRR/RAP seem to be due to a layer of dry air not far above the surface. Could be hard to overcome. Compare this to last night's sounding at GSO when very light snow was falling. Even with dry air working in from the front, the column is fairly well saturated. Finally, you can see this layer of dry air just above the surface already showing up this morning, so the HRRR, may, unfortunately be correct.
  9. Odd sounding, dry air all the way up the column. Not sure if this would yield precip, or what
  10. Almost reminds me of lake effect snow showers in Pittsburgh. At least you can get decent squalls with that, but it amazes me how any given January day, there's a high chance of seeing light snow showers. Kinda takes the fun out snow.
  11. Sounding that does not inspire confidence (although much improved a few hours later). We'll see hours upon hours of flizzard conditions, with a 3-6 hour window for light to moderate accumulations
  12. GFS very similar to last run. A light to moderate snowstorm for most of the sub
  13. RGEM looks much like the 0z Euro. More suppressed than last run
  14. It's still perhaps closer to a good outcome than it appears. Small changes yield big changes in results. We really need that initial northern energy to die out so the energy in Texas can amplify
  15. Don't think the NAM will be a good run for NW areas, but we shall see. Seems to be keying in more on the first piece of energy, which doesn't get the job done
  16. It's going to be painful for those on the N and W fringes watching the precip run into a wall of dry air for hours and hours
  17. The snow in WV/Northern VA a separate wave on the back end of the initial frontal passage
  18. Better than expected. Many would take this in a heartbeat (although note that the fringes will shrink with time as the forecast gets nailed down)
  19. Seems to me a step in the right direction for the NW gang. Moves a bit towards the idea of the low continuing to develop as it progresses east
×
×
  • Create New...