Jump to content

SnowGoose69

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    16,242
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SnowGoose69

  1. If temps are marginal it will be too high usually...it showed 2-3 mean across whole area last event which was obviously too much...it has 1-2 from NYC to the Suffolk border and 2-4 NYC west with some 4-5 inch areas Orange County and NW NJ
  2. The RGEM really sucks in anafrontal type scenarios or where you have incoming cold air...it usually is way too slow bleeding it in...the changeover will probably be closer to what the NAM or HRRR shows but I still do not expect much snow near the metro once you have the gradient flow through 700 being most NW...the HRRR shows snow 20-23Z in NYC but reality is that would be flurries...the period from 17-19z when you're more NNE or N is when you'd see your snow. Any sort of NW flow in a rain-snow scenario here never pans out...you need to be N-NE
  3. The RGEM/NAM are probably too far west if you ask me but I still do not like the setup anyway near the coast with the 3k nam or Euro setup
  4. HRRR basically has the change line to EWR-NYC by 16Z so it seems to indicate its going to go with snow to the coast 18-22...overall the HRRR has been fairly good recently to my surprise at 24-48...it never was impressed near the metro with this last storm and was rainier than the NAM/RGEM at 18-24 hours out
  5. Don't see how significant snow or really even low end meaningful snow happens at the coast in this one unless you get the track notably more east. You have too much of a NW component to the flow which will cause downsloping.
  6. This is one of those strange cases where places which radiated at night are more snowy than places more urban that normally would be snowier in an e-se flow
  7. 10am-noon is the window to watch...could see mod snow in that time and where you probably get a quick 2 inches at the coast but it would then probably flip back to slop soon after
  8. The SPC HREF has a mean of around 3 with spotty areas of 4 NE NJ/SW CT/Westchester with a max potential of 7-8. Its constantly been too high all winter though in marginal temp situations but it does indicate a potential for widespread amounts of 2 or so.
  9. Well the HRRR sure looks good Wed 12-18Z if you want snow but as we know not trustworthy at this range
  10. Euro is .27 snow at LGA but again taking those numbers verbatim is iffy..the Euro does indicate rates may be high enough but its also a whisker away from being amped enough its all rain
  11. Ptype wise the 12Z RGEM makes more sense...it more indicates the coast is rain but if this ends up as dynamic as the 12z NAM/RGEM show it could be decent snows even at the coast...both show roughly 36/28 spreads when the snow moves in...thats more than enough if you have steady precip this time of year to pile up outside of the pavement
  12. There is a notable snow min 3/15-3/30 then a second peak 4/1-4/10...I don't know if thats purely by chance as we are only talking about a period of 130 years or it may be a factor of continued shortening wavelengths leading to better chance a system is not able to wrap up and go inland or along the coast in April leading to better chance of a favorable snow track
  13. It was Sunday night 10pm-6am Monday AM. I got 7.5 in Nassau. Most places saw 6-10 I think on LI with 3-6 in Queens/NYC though the airports due to it being 32-33 measured low. I think models simply could not resolve how well the lower level cold air would advect in...it was like 48-50 degrees at 6pm. I recall clearly the 4pm update Upton dropped the WSW which was out entirely.
  14. For some strange reason NYC has climatological holes in snow from 1/1-1/6 and also 3/19-3/27 or so despite having big events before and after that..I'll never figure that one out, especially the early April max
  15. Basically NNE winds everywhere...as is usually the case with these with a high in that spot models wanted to turn winds too ENE
  16. LOL SWF reporting SN IP. I don’t think IP has been the code for sleet since the 80s
  17. Yeah this still needs to be watched from LGA on W-N...there are still indications on all guidance of surface winds backing somewhat to 050-070 after 09-10z...and typically they underestimate the degree of backing when they show that and it ends up more 030-050..if that happens places like NE NJ/NYC/N Queens/Bronx are going to have problems
  18. I think everyone in this subforum is 5 inches or less for sure with the 5 near SWF and 1 or less near NYC
  19. The SPC SREF as far as snow amount mean is something between the NAM/RGEM in the LHV and S CT...for FRZ RAIN its fairly ominous for the metro and has notably high confidence across all of WRN LI W-SW into CNJ and the metro
  20. The SPC HREF mean sure seems to be something between the NAM and RGEM based on snow amounts...no doubt its indicating the Euro is probably out to lunch
  21. The NAM now basically shows all frozen minus the tail end for NYC metro northern half
  22. Honestly that one probably was a fail even in February, it was similar to December 9 1995 and January 17 94 in that the 850s barely went above 0C but surface flow was S'ly so that coastal areas torched while 5-10 miles inland was cold enough to stay all snow
  23. December 05 was probably the biggest ever, 0 at JFK and 5=6 at LGA/NYC I think. 1/7/94 some far north points of the North Fork had 6-10 inches of snow while most of the remainder of LI was PL or FZRA. February 99 the N shore of Nassau back into Queens/NYC had a nasty ice storm maybe .25-.40 at 27-29 while the S shore was 35-37
×
×
  • Create New...