Jump to content

SnowGoose69

Professional Forecaster
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16,621

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SnowGoose69

  1. SnowGoose69
    Generally no, but in cases like this where the setup is semi complicated with a ton going on we've seen it happen.
  2. SnowGoose69
    2/1999 was one I thought of too though I think that missed the Carolinas, that backed in from well out over the ocean
  3. SnowGoose69
    This is highly likely to just close off way too early but I would not rule out the chance of a modest snowfall here potentially, I just doubt we are likely to see a monster storm in this area
  4. SnowGoose69
    For the past few years the UKMET/Euro have often tended to go reverse directions at this range, but this winter so far they've tended to follow each other.
  5. SnowGoose69
    My main concern now is too much of a NW move down in the SE over time. We don't want to see places like BHM/ATL/BNA getting accumulating snow from this, if that happens there would be a higher chance this has mixing issues up here.
  6. SnowGoose69
    The 1st one was not either, it was expected to be south although the morning prior or even 36 hours prior models began making a shift to the north.
  7. SnowGoose69
    The end of the ensemble runs look to perhaps be signaling the soon to be breakdown of the pattern as they are retrograding the ridge out west but it could ultimately be 2/15 or later before that happens
  8. SnowGoose69
    For areas near you to get involved this has to amp up and get going earlier but that is certainly possible given the setup that this could trend that way.
  9. SnowGoose69
    LOL. Florida would shatter record lows in some spots if that 120 hour ICON verified
  10. SnowGoose69
    Central Park ended with 11.4
  11. SnowGoose69
    You can see how just N of Central Park in NE NJ there's totals of 13-14, definitely a sharp increase where it stayed snow
  12. SnowGoose69
    Depends on if we go to FZRAPL. They went from 7.2 to 8.8 from 1pm to 345pm so probably could get to 10.5-11 if we stay mainly sleet
  13. SnowGoose69
    NYC record was only one not from 1/25/2000 I think
  14. SnowGoose69
    This will be a test for the RRFS to see if its idea of the line pushing back SE is right.
  15. SnowGoose69
    Its unlikely I think they'd add more than 1-2 more inches anyway, though they probably did get an inch from 1-2pm
  16. SnowGoose69
    Yeah the good news is it seems the RRFS is close to as good as the NAM and better than the HRRR on this. The HRRR actually picked up on it this event, probably because it was such strong warm advection
  17. SnowGoose69
    They had 7.2 at 1pm
  18. SnowGoose69
    Yeah based on measurement of 7.2 and EWR 8.0 I think we know those are off unless ratios came down so far the last 3 hours they averaged out 9 or 10:1 in the end
  19. SnowGoose69
    I have heard EWR was 7.7 as of 1pm, not official, it may be near that
  20. SnowGoose69
    The liquid equivalent at NYC of .73 seems high relative to LGA/EWR/JFK unless they just have been under heavy banding.
  21. SnowGoose69
    Yes. I think even LGA/JFK have some freezing rain like 01-04z maybe as things really lighten up
  22. SnowGoose69
    The Central Park cam at 72nd street you can see the plow go by and within 10 minutes its covered up
  23. SnowGoose69
    JFK now at 5, EWR 7, NYC had .17 liquid this hour! I think JFK may be undermeasuring a bit, they do often times in windy events.
  24. SnowGoose69
    PHL over to SNPL. EWR on their SPECI just now has had .09 liquid this hour already so maybe 2-3 inches again
  25. SnowGoose69
    EWR 2/5 now .09 last hour...JFK reported .06 but no snow remark total for the hour. NYC had .13 liquid
×
×
  • Create New...