Jump to content

SnowGoose69

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    16,649
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SnowGoose69

  1. The 18Z EC/AI were like 12/27/04 level misses. 75-100 miles and you go from nothing or a minor event to a monster.
  2. The RGEM has been pretty money this winter at 84, generally too amped overall as has always been the case but I'd usually take it 9 out of 10 over the NAM at 84.
  3. GFS tends to be stubborn most of the time, in this case since the solution is wonky it might waffle but ordinarily whatever it shows around 96-120 it holds til like 36-48 when it caves.
  4. Generally no, but in cases like this where the setup is semi complicated with a ton going on we've seen it happen.
  5. 2/1999 was one I thought of too though I think that missed the Carolinas, that backed in from well out over the ocean
  6. This is highly likely to just close off way too early but I would not rule out the chance of a modest snowfall here potentially, I just doubt we are likely to see a monster storm in this area
  7. For the past few years the UKMET/Euro have often tended to go reverse directions at this range, but this winter so far they've tended to follow each other.
  8. My main concern now is too much of a NW move down in the SE over time. We don't want to see places like BHM/ATL/BNA getting accumulating snow from this, if that happens there would be a higher chance this has mixing issues up here.
  9. The 1st one was not either, it was expected to be south although the morning prior or even 36 hours prior models began making a shift to the north.
  10. The end of the ensemble runs look to perhaps be signaling the soon to be breakdown of the pattern as they are retrograding the ridge out west but it could ultimately be 2/15 or later before that happens
  11. For areas near you to get involved this has to amp up and get going earlier but that is certainly possible given the setup that this could trend that way.
  12. LOL. Florida would shatter record lows in some spots if that 120 hour ICON verified
  13. You can see how just N of Central Park in NE NJ there's totals of 13-14, definitely a sharp increase where it stayed snow
  14. Depends on if we go to FZRAPL. They went from 7.2 to 8.8 from 1pm to 345pm so probably could get to 10.5-11 if we stay mainly sleet
  15. NYC record was only one not from 1/25/2000 I think
  16. This will be a test for the RRFS to see if its idea of the line pushing back SE is right.
  17. Its unlikely I think they'd add more than 1-2 more inches anyway, though they probably did get an inch from 1-2pm
  18. Yeah the good news is it seems the RRFS is close to as good as the NAM and better than the HRRR on this. The HRRR actually picked up on it this event, probably because it was such strong warm advection
  19. Yeah based on measurement of 7.2 and EWR 8.0 I think we know those are off unless ratios came down so far the last 3 hours they averaged out 9 or 10:1 in the end
  20. I have heard EWR was 7.7 as of 1pm, not official, it may be near that
  21. The liquid equivalent at NYC of .73 seems high relative to LGA/EWR/JFK unless they just have been under heavy banding.
  22. Yes. I think even LGA/JFK have some freezing rain like 01-04z maybe as things really lighten up
  23. The Central Park cam at 72nd street you can see the plow go by and within 10 minutes its covered up
×
×
  • Create New...