Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Looks that way. Just looking at that chart, you’d think 2022 was an interesting year compared to the 80s and 90s when I grew up here. But it was the most boring severe wx season I’ve ever seen. The 90s were far more interesting, and even witnessed a few hailstorms. One produced sizes between golf balls and tennis balls.
  2. 2019 must have been a fun one!
  3. That’s a bazooka right there. Can only hope it can get close to verifying.
  4. DCA -0.3 96 NYC +0.8 97 BOS +1.2 97 ORD +1.0 95 ATL -0.6 98 IAH -1.6 102 DEN +0.5 99 PHX -0.8 117 SEA +2.0 99
  5. Since about March, those anoms have been propagating W -> E, so while we may see a trade wind burst starting on the 10th, there’s a WWB at the same time around 90E. That may propagate to near the dateline through July like the early May WWB (which barely made it over the dateline by late May). So not all hope is lost yet.
  6. May will likely finish below normal at IAD. Not including 5/31, we’re at -1.8F so far.
  7. Well, he’s not all that wrong. If I’m seeing non-English tweets being posted here (a primarily English speaking forum) in support of a super nino, I gotta say you’re digging pretty deep. At least bluewave backs up his own analysis with data, even if I don’t like where the data is pointing towards.
  8. Yeah, I still don’t understand the talk about heading into a super event this year. This one’s likely going high-end moderate, tops.
  9. Getting a nice round of rain. Probably not enough to put a dent into the drought, but I’ll take it.
  10. Best day of the year weather wise. 70s minimal humidity with a breeze. Went to a park with the kiddo, lots of people and families out. And for once, it didn’t rain on Saturday
  11. Is that the GFS forecast you usually share here? Looking at the dateline between now and June 6th or so, that's quite a change from previous forecasts. Previously, it was mostly blue, but now it's mostly neutral. Could be a sign of the models catching up to the transition? I don't pay attention to anything beyond 7 days so the stronger trades on June 6th and onward in this run may or may not actually pan out. But we're still not out of the spring predictability barrier, so.
  12. As would I. I don’t want to see a high-end strong or super as 1) that would flood the entire CONUS (and globe) with excess warmth, and 2) it may kick off yet another multi-year nina.
  13. This, to me, sounds like further validation of the recharge oscillator model for enso.
  14. I was thinking the same the other day
  15. Forecast looks to weaken the trades slightly at or slightly east of the dateline over the next ~7 days.
  16. Milky white sky today. Smoke from canada fires?
  17. Pulled from CPC's enso update. Could be an interesting summer for severe wx?
  18. Broken clock is right twice a day. Or at least we hope.
  19. Pouring here in Ashburn. Not going to have to water the garden for another week.
  20. 80 and sunny. Thick cloud deck out west over the mountains.
  21. Yep, I’ve been keeping a close eye on the pdo, which has just as important (if not more) effects on our winters as enso does. This kind of progress is what we want to see. Otoh, the pdo was as negative as it could possibly get so some rise was inevitable. We just need enough of a rise to break the -pdo/-pna that has plagued our winters since 2016.
  22. It is, but it doesn’t mean that the mean forecast is more likely to be correct. Did these models predict that the trades would stay this strong all throughout May? Or did they underforecast those trades? @bluewave might know because he’s been tracking this closely.
  23. IAD is -1.8 so far MTD. April was +4.2 though
  24. At least this wasn’t a cold/wet gut punch of a spring after a record warm winter
×
×
  • Create New...