Jump to content

Terpeast

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Terpeast

  1. Is that the GFS forecast you usually share here? Looking at the dateline between now and June 6th or so, that's quite a change from previous forecasts. Previously, it was mostly blue, but now it's mostly neutral. Could be a sign of the models catching up to the transition? I don't pay attention to anything beyond 7 days so the stronger trades on June 6th and onward in this run may or may not actually pan out. But we're still not out of the spring predictability barrier, so.
  2. As would I. I don’t want to see a high-end strong or super as 1) that would flood the entire CONUS (and globe) with excess warmth, and 2) it may kick off yet another multi-year nina.
  3. This, to me, sounds like further validation of the recharge oscillator model for enso.
  4. I was thinking the same the other day
  5. Forecast looks to weaken the trades slightly at or slightly east of the dateline over the next ~7 days.
  6. Milky white sky today. Smoke from canada fires?
  7. Pulled from CPC's enso update. Could be an interesting summer for severe wx?
  8. Broken clock is right twice a day. Or at least we hope.
  9. Pouring here in Ashburn. Not going to have to water the garden for another week.
  10. 80 and sunny. Thick cloud deck out west over the mountains.
  11. Yep, I’ve been keeping a close eye on the pdo, which has just as important (if not more) effects on our winters as enso does. This kind of progress is what we want to see. Otoh, the pdo was as negative as it could possibly get so some rise was inevitable. We just need enough of a rise to break the -pdo/-pna that has plagued our winters since 2016.
  12. It is, but it doesn’t mean that the mean forecast is more likely to be correct. Did these models predict that the trades would stay this strong all throughout May? Or did they underforecast those trades? @bluewave might know because he’s been tracking this closely.
  13. IAD is -1.8 so far MTD. April was +4.2 though
  14. At least this wasn’t a cold/wet gut punch of a spring after a record warm winter
  15. Thinking they’re overly bullish. But if I mentally adjust those projections by -0.5, we’re still looking at a 1.5 nino3.4 with 1.0 nino1.2. I would like that to verify, tbh.
  16. I was going to point out a pdo reversal after cpc’s monday enso report. But you summed it up. Selfishly, we want a positive pdo, but it could be disastrous for NW canada.
  17. A moderate 1.3-1.6 nino would be good for the mid atlantic, much better than a strong/super. The pdo will have something to say about it though.
  18. Nice work, @40/70 Benchmark I enjoy reading your posts. This was a tough one to forecast because it falls on the extreme end of the climate spectrum. Who would have guessed that JF would see +8 temps while California gets buried as record snows effectively erased their decades-long drought? Raindance did a good job, but even he didn’t forecast these extremes. Doug K down here in DCA only gave us 2-6” of snow in his outlook, and even he was too generous with that. Sure, the nina and +qbo, IOD, maritime forcing, etc. Were all unfavorable, but if you told me last October how this winter would transpire, I would have thought you were nuts.
  19. Did BBQ on the new grill for Mother’s Day. Perfect day today. Low humidity with a gentle breeze. Can’t ask for better than this. This won’t last long before the humidity comes in.
  20. Yeah, we’ll know better where this is going to go in another month or two. I think I saw somewhere that a WWB is coming later this month into early June, so we’ll see if that makes it over the dateline. That being said, I don’t think the stronger end of the forecasts are going to work out. I see it peaking at moderate or low end strong. 1.4 give or take
  21. Good to see this, thanks. So it IS possible for the PDO to rise by 2 or 3 in a short time span (a year or less). 8% seems a low probability, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me to see the PDO get close to neutral. Based on our east coast snowstorm history, we don't really need a strong +PDO for it to happen. We just need to mute the unfavorable mid-latitude pac forcing to allow the enso to couple.
  22. So do I. That’s why I’m hoping the -pdo will become less negative or closer to neutral.
  23. Exactly. Because the pdo is so negative now, I think it will stay negative for a while. Just less so.
  24. Best case is the pdo returns to neutral, which opens up some favorable possibilities for next winter. Don’t see it going positive so soon after record negative
×
×
  • Create New...