Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I want to say that was around the time the city started to experience it's development boom (well before the 70's) but would be a reasoning to explain the rapid increase in overnight mins (urban heating)...very similar to that of Las Vegas
  3. 75” of snow that started in mid-November. Constant LES. Tundra-like feel at times. No ice storms. A well-timed torch in February with thunderstorms before more snow. Solid A. Would be A+ if we had one more good synoptic event.
  4. Compacted now like the ol squeezebox
  5. Yup, meh. But it could end up giving us a better shot at the SWFE the more it fades
  6. Updated snowfall analysis maps for the Blizzard of 2026. SNE & CT only maps are up as well. This may be updated in the future. A full page with radar/sfc/upper air maps coming soon. https://www.jdjweatherconsulting.com/winter-25-26 Lower Northeast Contours Only Tri-Sate Area
  7. A limited edition accordion was just smashed into pieces…
  8. Honestly think best case is cashing in snow-wise Monday like Euro AI shows, realizing most or all will be melted and washed away by the weekend.
  9. It won’t matter…all you need is rates. If the rates are good..it sticks. Period!
  10. Updated snowfall analysis maps for the Blizzard of 2026. Everything is updated on the site, a full page with surface maps/H5 and radar will come soon. CT and Tri-State only maps are up as well. https://www.jdjweatherconsulting.com/winter-25-26 Lower Northeast Contours Only Southern New England
  11. Their average high for winter (DJF) so far is 54.2°. 13.4” of snow so far. Their 2 weeks before Xmas was mostly 60s and 70s
  12. Right but the point is it was LESS WRONG then all the other models day 5-8 and so on a chart of verification scores it would look good.
  13. Looking season to date totals, if anyone has them, for 3 CT locations; Southbury, Woodbury and Newtown... Thanks in advance...
  14. To me this seems like a storm that the mountains will dry out. No moisture coming from gulf and progressive flow usually kills us. .
  15. Ok now out far enough. Ya that’s noting going to get it done. Needs to beef up
  16. Nothing worse than a met hyping model run that falls on its face
  17. I think the broader point is that verification scores aren’t gonna translate to specific areas for specific events… just not how it works. You can take or leave them as how a model performs if you want to but it’s kinda the only objective measure And it’s correct to say the AIFS was first to ID a big east coast storm. It was just wrong for us. But thr GFS was even more wrong!
  18. yeah i wonder why, Euro ai shows a decent hit
  19. No. The record for Denver is 40.2° during Winter 1933-34.
  20. Just skip this run. It's not horrific like Ji said, but it's pretty paltry
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...