Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Nam run wasn’t super great but the end of the 3k was going absolutely nuclear over us with the deform band.
  3. Hey @mgerb- curious if you have any feedback from NWS folks or any comments on my long post above outlining my rationale. TIA.
  4. It does countless wonky things on this run. But hey who knows. Not us. .
  5. Foot+ in ENC. Pretty much all guidance is a snowstorm in this area. Probably the highest confidence area.
  6. Oh so we're back to the "Oh that run wasnt good we toss" part of the storm lol
  7. crossposting from MA to get y'alls opinions: I don't really buy the extreme east double barrel low depicted on the 18z euro, and to a greater extent, the 00z NAM. Doesn't really feel super realistic.
  8. Yeah NAM not going to get it done but it is the NAM
  9. I'm still learning, but the 0z nam panel below has this new energy I havent seen on other runs that seems to consolidate. It seems a lot stronger, and on the surface sim radar panel it shows low placement over the carribbean. Is that inconsequential or something drawing our system more SE? Sent from my SM-S938U using Tapatalk
  10. Luckily the NAM is pretty much by itself. I don’t know of any other model that shows what it is. Definitely on an island alone.
  11. Nam will be fine for coastal NC/SC but there's a trend on the NAM pushing more confluence
  12. It dug a little more but went negative tilt too late. It is the long range nam. The upper low was not too far off the 18z euro
  13. NAM didn’t do well with the last storm. And doesn’t perform well with Miller A in general. .
  14. Trof has more positive tilt than 18z
  15. i’m convinced the NAM model hates me. It’s personal. It knows it’s me. .
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...