DirtySnowDen Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:19 AM 8 minutes ago, Prismshine Productions said: Yeah it is going to be warmer, but far from the worst case scenario we were looking at a few months ago Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk I agree, but can’t rule out a solid storm away from the coast. If you are on the coast south of Boston, I think you are porked for snowfall totals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted yesterday at 02:14 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:14 AM 2 hours ago, Go Kart Mozart said: How did it compare to the upcoming?...understanding it is tough to know what really happened in the 1800s.... I read a paper that Paul Roundy had shared in the last couple of years that discussed any known global impacts. Like you said, a lot if it has to be pieced together from written records from individuals in parts of the world in that time frame & then the rest from reanalysis. If I can find the paper I will share it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted yesterday at 02:17 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:17 AM 1 minute ago, stadiumwave said: I read a paper that Paul Roundy had shared in the last couple of years that discussed any known global impacts. Like you said, a lot if it has to be pieced together from written records from individuals in parts of the world in that time frame & then the rest from reanalysis. If I can find the paper I will share it. Here are a couple: https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/33/11/jcli-d-19-0650.1.xml https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/31/23/jcli-d-18-0159.1.xml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySnowDen Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM Share Posted yesterday at 02:51 AM 4 hours ago, Prismshine Productions said: Yeah it is going to be warmer, but far from the worst case scenario we were looking at a few months ago Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk I’ve turned into the old man from “Up” last ten years. I used to hope for snow/oce, now I hope for rain. Sadly, anything ocean/oscillating is terrible when forecasting 7-10 days out. However, when it arrives”whether” it’s pos or neg, kinda dictates the next few months. It is a planetary flow. I do not know what to expect, but being a borderline record El Niño this year means something……..Can I get callout on how super El Niños performed in the region? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 12:15 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:15 PM 13 hours ago, stadiumwave said: That El Nino was something! That potential has to at least be considered possible. This is totally anecdotal, but I really doubt it considering the stretch from which we are just emerging. I think we are on par for some positive regression in terms of snowfall...I understand the CC-oriented counter to that, and it's perfectly valid, so no need to get into that...ultimately all we can do is guess, and that is mine. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 12:16 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:16 PM 15 hours ago, EasternLI said: 1877-78 was known as the year without a winter. Interestingly a very powerful el nino event that year. We were really paid back 100 years later!! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 12:19 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 12:19 PM 10 hours ago, DirtySnowDen said: I agree, but can’t rule out a solid storm away from the coast. If you are on the coast south of Boston, I think you are porked for snowfall totals. I wouldn't say that given major El Nino climo....I think lower in latitude has the best shot at above climo snowfall. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted yesterday at 02:01 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:01 PM 17 hours ago, EasternLI said: 1877-78 was known as the year without a winter. Interestingly a very powerful el nino event that year. CON’s 2nd coldest temp on record was in Jan 1878. 50” of snow on the season which is BN but not a ratter in the period of record. But that was in the middle of a stretch of very snowy winters. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:03 PM 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: This is totally anecdotal, but I really doubt it considering the stretch from which we are just emerging. I think we are on par for some positive regression in terms of snowfall...I understand the CC-oriented counter to that, and it's perfectly valid, so no need to get into that...ultimately all we can do is guess, and that is mine. Oh, I don't really think that will occur but was just saying its a possibility. I lean toward a better than average winter compared to some of the other Super El Nino's. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stadiumwave Posted yesterday at 02:04 PM Share Posted yesterday at 02:04 PM NMME Update DEC JAN FEB MARCH 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 04:53 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 04:53 PM October Euro seasonal gives me 46.3" of snowfall from November-April...same, exact total as 1997-1998. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted yesterday at 08:05 PM Share Posted yesterday at 08:05 PM October Euro seasonal gives me 46.3" of snowfall from November-April...same, exact total as 1997-1998.Got it for the rest of NE?Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted yesterday at 08:38 PM Share Posted yesterday at 08:38 PM 6 hours ago, dendrite said: CON’s 2nd coldest temp on record was in Jan 1878. 50” of snow on the season which is BN but not a ratter in the period of record. But that was in the middle of a stretch of very snowy winters. The core of the most impressive anomalies in 1877-78 were in the far upper midwest and into Canada. It was and still is known as Minnesota's infamous "year without a winter". The temp departures, even against the current milder averages, are astounding, especially in northern Minnesota. Further east, it was a torch December here but only run-of-the-mill mild Jan/Feb, with quite a snowy stretch from late Jan to mid Feb. Detroit finished with 43.4", right around avg for snowfall, but snowfall was heavily confined to Jan-Feb, with only 1.0" in Nov, 1.9" Dec, T Mar and 0 Apr. It was certainly a mild winter in the east, but nothing like Minnesota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 3 hours ago, michsnowfreak said: The core of the most impressive anomalies in 1877-78 were in the far upper midwest and into Canada. It was and still is known as Minnesota's infamous "year without a winter". The temp departures, even against the current milder averages, are astounding, especially in northern Minnesota. Further east, it was a torch December here but only run-of-the-mill mild Jan/Feb, with quite a snowy stretch from late Jan to mid Feb. Detroit finished with 43.4", right around avg for snowfall, but snowfall was heavily confined to Jan-Feb, with only 1.0" in Nov, 1.9" Dec, T Mar and 0 Apr. It was certainly a mild winter in the east, but nothing like Minnesota. As strong as that Nino may have been, one would assume that the implied RONI was off the charts compared to the upcoming winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 3 hours ago, michsnowfreak said: The core of the most impressive anomalies in 1877-78 were in the far upper midwest and into Canada. It was and still is known as Minnesota's infamous "year without a winter". The temp departures, even against the current milder averages, are astounding, especially in northern Minnesota. Further east, it was a torch December here but only run-of-the-mill mild Jan/Feb, with quite a snowy stretch from late Jan to mid Feb. Detroit finished with 43.4", right around avg for snowfall, but snowfall was heavily confined to Jan-Feb, with only 1.0" in Nov, 1.9" Dec, T Mar and 0 Apr. It was certainly a mild winter in the east, but nothing like Minnesota. Sure…not saying it was cold overall. Just that there were still periods of record cold east of the Rockies and within a Std Dev of snowfall. Summer 1816 had some 90s up here too. But yeah, there weren’t many cold shots in the upper plains and midwest that winter. Blowtorch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 2 hours ago, dendrite said: Sure…not saying it was cold overall. Just that there were still periods of record cold east of the Rockies and within a Std Dev of snowfall. Summer 1816 had some 90s up here too. But yeah, there weren’t many cold shots in the upper plains and midwest that winter. Blowtorch. Oh for sure. This is something a shocking number of people cant seem to grasp- that a mild seasonal mean doesnt mean no cold blasts or below avg days, it just means fewer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcmmKU Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 16 hours ago, michsnowfreak said: The core of the most impressive anomalies in 1877-78 were in the far upper midwest and into Canada. It was and still is known as Minnesota's infamous "year without a winter". The temp departures, even against the current milder averages, are astounding, especially in northern Minnesota. Further east, it was a torch December here but only run-of-the-mill mild Jan/Feb, with quite a snowy stretch from late Jan to mid Feb. Detroit finished with 43.4", right around avg for snowfall, but snowfall was heavily confined to Jan-Feb, with only 1.0" in Nov, 1.9" Dec, T Mar and 0 Apr. It was certainly a mild winter in the east, but nothing like Minnesota. Uber niños have a better chance of being torch in the upper midwest I feel. But MN is so cold that a torch looks like highs in the 20s and 30s and lows in the 10s rather than the usual sub zero lows and highs in the teens. Still cold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 17 hours ago, Prismshine Productions said: Got it for the rest of NE? Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk This isn't the total snowfall map, but it is the change in snowfall in the October Euro seasonal vs September's run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago heh...that region in the NE US looks like the (superstorm 1993 + climate change)/2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prismshine Productions Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago This isn't the total snowfall map, but it is the change in snowfall in the October Euro seasonal vs September's run.Doing a bit of math here... Last month was at -5.5", converting that new map to inches and adding...Well, shit, -1.5"Sent from my SM-S176V using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, MarcmmKU said: Uber niños have a better chance of being torch in the upper midwest I feel. But MN is so cold that a torch looks like highs in the 20s and 30s and lows in the 10s rather than the usual sub zero lows and highs in the teens. Still cold. This is another excellent point. I sometimes think some get too wrapped up in the reds and blues of a temp anomaly map. Dark red in Winnipeg and blue in Atlanta? Means it's only going to be 30F colder in Winnipeg than Atlanta instead of the normal 40F colder lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layman Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Saw this fun little graphic at Accuweather. 15”-30” for Boston? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted 46 minutes ago Share Posted 46 minutes ago 3 hours ago, michsnowfreak said: This is another excellent point. I sometimes think some get too wrapped up in the reds and blues of a temp anomaly map. Dark red in Winnipeg and blue in Atlanta? Means it's only going to be 30F colder in Winnipeg than Atlanta instead of the normal 40F colder lol. I mean it’s all relative. It could be +10F for winter here and it’d still be too cold for me. 1877-1878 in DLH Dec +15.6F Jan +9.3F Feb +15.6F (yes same dep as Dec) Mar +11.8F Roughly +13F for DJFM is pretty wild 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted 41 minutes ago Share Posted 41 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, dendrite said: I mean it’s all relative. It could be +10F for winter here and it’d still be too cold for me. 1877-1878 in DLH Dec +15.6F Jan +9.3F Feb +15.6F (yes same dep as Dec) Mar +11.8F Roughly +13F for DJFM is pretty wild Absolutely all relative. I love arctic cold. Last winter was great even without heavy total snowfall. It was cold, frozen and white. Often times the "warm" spells in strong ninos here is damp overcast with highs 37-40°, which is more uncomfortable imo than dry cold at 0°. An active pattern should hopefully promote a temp rollercoaster even though it ends up mild in the mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted 32 minutes ago Share Posted 32 minutes ago 42 minutes ago, Layman said: Saw this fun little graphic at Accuweather. 15”-30” for Boston? Pretty big ranges. But the low end of the range seems ridiculous for Chicago. They've had 4 winters on record with less than 15", most recently 1949. They did however have a sub-20" winter a few years ago. Detroit has not had a sub-20" winter since 1969 (came close in 1983). And Buffalo is always a wildcard depending if lake bands set up over the airport or elsewhere. Boston, Philadelphia and NYC will likely be too low if indeed a huge noreaster occurs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now