Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,648
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

2026-2027 El Nino


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 The new Cansips has winter anomalies significantly colder in the NE than the SE:

IMG_0064.thumb.png.2d8962fb74de3810ace5d793997ece07.png

 For all of the Ninos peaking at +1.5+, not a single one going back at least to 1895-6 had a colder NE than SE anomaly wise! Not even one!
 
 These are the winters: 2023-4, 2015-6, 2009-10, 2002-3, 1997-8, 1991-2, 1987-8, 1986-7, 1982-3, 1972-3, 1965-6, 1957-8, 1940-1, 1930-1, 1925-6, 1918-9, 1902-3, 1899-00, and 1896-7. That’s 19 winters, a nice sample size suggesting the CANSIPS E US winter temp. anomalies and a strong El Niño prog aren’t at all jibing with history.

 Here is the aggregate of those 19 winters:

IMG_0065.png.c4a508058cbcf90915b0fc06d9dc067f.png
 

Edit: Even going all of the way down to peaks of +1.0 yields the same result, no winter colder in NE than SE. That adds 13 more for a total sample size of 33!

I see it has some split forcing showing up with some lingering convection in the west pacific. Also appears to be more basin-wide. I agree - i think a +TNH outcome like that is probably overkill even if there’s split forcing.

 

IMG_8813.png

IMG_8814.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said:

I see it has some split forcing showing up with some lingering convection in the west pacific. Also appears to be more basin-wide. I agree - i think a +TNH outcome like that is probably overkill even if there’s split forcing.

 

IMG_8813.png

IMG_8814.png

Yea, I could buy some vestige of it remaining, but it's probably overdone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

What does it look like in the ENSO region?

What Chuck said. It has a healthy strength Nino, probably nearing or exceeding +1.5 ONI. That doesn’t as you know at all jibe with the La Ninaish temperature anomaly pattern it has for the US and Canada. Like I said, I’ve found no +1.0+ Nino winter anything close to the Ninalike configuration Cansips has out of 32 of them! Really weird and why I expect its overall Ninaish US temp. configuration to badly bust if a decent El Niño were to verify.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

Yeah, April 1997 had a really warm subsurface

Image links aren't working. I'll try to upload image later

Yea, 1997 got insanely warm in the subsurface starting in the spring like this one appears to be doing. SSTs ended up peaking in region 3.4 on the weeklies at +2.8C the last week of November, 1997

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way Nino 4 is warming is so interesting. Again, only 2 April's on record had higher than +0.500 monthly for later in year >+1.2 El Nino's (out of 15):

April 1997: +0.59

April 2015: +0.98

We are at +0.511 on April 1. There is so much warm potential energy for things to easily go strong. 

PhillyEaglesfan may not get his Strong Nina for a while. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

The way Nino 4 is warming is so interesting. Again, only 2 April's on record had higher than +0.500 monthly for later in year >+1.2 El Nino's (out of 15):

April 1997: +0.59

April 2015: +0.98

We are at +0.511 on April 1. There is so much warm potential energy for things to easily go strong. 

PhillyEaglesfan may not get his Strong Nina for a while. 

Said it the other day, but I think “high-end” strong is going to be the floor with this event, with super prospects increasing 

@bluewave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

The way Nino 4 is warming is so interesting. Again, only 2 April's on record had higher than +0.500 monthly for later in year >+1.2 El Nino's (out of 15):

April 1997: +0.59

April 2015: +0.98

We are at +0.511 on April 1. There is so much warm potential energy for things to easily go strong. 

PhillyEaglesfan may not get his Strong Nina for a while. 

I wouldn't be too sure. After the 1997-98 event, a double-year strong la nina followed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said:

I wouldn't be too sure. After the 1997-98 event, a double-year strong la nina followed.

I'm not too sure we go cold ENSO after this El Nino. We had 5/6 recent Nina years. History says 4/6+ reverses +1-4 years 2:1 (El Nino favored 2x over La Nina)

We also had a Strong Nino in 23-24, history says +3-5 years after that, El Nino is also favored 2:1. 

+ENSO tendency for 27-28 and 28-29 may temper the Nina snap back. 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ocean/index/heat_content_index.txt

100-180W warmth, 0-300m down for Jan/Feb/Mar. 

2026: +0.49 / +1.15 / +1.28

Closest Matches since 1979 - all too cold v. CFS/Canadian for US temps in April. 1997/2015 are close - but 1997 is more impressive since it followed multiple cold ENSO years while 2015 followed...a weak El Nino. We've warmed up way faster than 1982 or 2023 as well.

2019:  +0.59 / +0.94 / +1.19

2015:  +0.15 / +0.83 / +1.52 

1997:   +0.56 / +1.00 / +1.17

1990:  +0.78 / +1.08 / +1.14

Blend: +0.52 / +0.96 / +1.26

You can verify if "El Nino" ish stuff is happening without the US data. Japan maps anomalies monthly with a bit of a lag.

https://www.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/products/climate/climatview/frame.php?&s=7&r=4&d=0&y=2026&m=2&e=4&t=1000&l=5115&k=0&s=7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upon further review, Cansips is progging a W to C based ~+2 to +2.2 ONI from SON through JFM. I’d assume that would mean ~+1.5 to +1.7 W to C based RONI. Nothing bad about that if it were to verify. But I’m taking it w/grain due to La Niña temp pattern, which doesn’t make sense per history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Where are we going for daily H5 charts now that this site is no longer updating?

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/composites/day/

This site is fine for temps and precip.

https://prism.oregonstate.edu/comparisons/anomalies.php

We should still be able use ERA 5 now for 500MB reanalysis dataset which first becomes available about 5 days after the month ends.

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/atmoswrit/map/

IMG_6046.png.36d4edf15a0f3e62d03d088224062db8.png

 

IMG_6047.thumb.jpeg.f0467c75ff5ff31012007eb2a77a3619.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, GaWx said:

What Chuck said. It has a healthy strength Nino, probably nearing or exceeding +1.5 ONI. That doesn’t as you know at all jibe with the La Ninaish temperature anomaly pattern it has for the US and Canada. Like I said, I’ve found no +1.0+ Nino winter anything close to the Ninalike configuration Cansips has out of 32 of them! Really weird and why I expect its overall Ninaish US temp. configuration to badly bust if a decent El Niño were to verify.

 

It looks like a weaker El Nino....I would toss that for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

I think it will be basin-wide like 2015-16

2015-16 is also a +QBO match later in the year, and Phoenix which broke it's DJFM Temp record by 4.2 degrees this past Winter, number 2 on record was 2014-15, before the 2015 El Nino. 

Best analog right now imo

I could see a somewhat weaker version of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winter is going to be mild...let's get that out of the way....but at least a basin-wide deal like 2015 allowed for a couple of wintry intervals, and maybe if it's a somewhat weaker version we can get away with a bit more. That's all I mean when I say "weaker"...I'm not trying to be one of those social medaiologists that are getting roasted by snowman on twitter. :lol:

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Winter is going to be mild...let's get that out of the way....but at least a basin-wide deal like 2015 allowed for a couple of wintry intervals, and maybe if it's a somewhat weaker version we can get away with a bit more. That's all I mean when I say "weaker"...I'm not trying to be one of those social medaiologists that are getting roasted by snowman on twitter. :lol:

2015-2016 is acceptable ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...