Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,448
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Snowman92
    Newest Member
    Snowman92
    Joined

Mid-Long Range Discussion 2026


BooneWX
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

Thats a top 10 snowy month of the past 50 years here.  

january_6-7_1996_nc_snowmap.gif

january_12_1996_nc_snowmap.gif

We had just done a thinning at our family  tree farm in Vance county and that ice storm wiped out most of the pines. Was devastating for the tree rotation ended up having to do a salvage cut and start over, 20 years in the hole 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WinstonSalemArlington said:

Weenie wishcasting. :P We were torching into January just two weeks ago with winter cancel posts abounding.  45-day trends are honestly worthless at this point.  Eye candy, sure.  But lets come back to this on Valentines Day and see how this validates.  This whole winter so far has been forecasted extreme swings that seem to validate for 36-48 hours and then right back to more moderate seasonal weather.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern with the 8-10th period has been and will continue to be the lack of solutions showing storms. The means regressed significantly last night and even those had been driven by a couple members with a big storm vs a lot of members showing something or something close. It just hasn’t gathered much modeling support and in the 10-day timeframe you’d really want to at least start seeing ensemble support for a valid threat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Leesville Wx Hawk said:

Looks like 4th and 7, need to punt.  Maybe the offense can matriculate down the field a bit more once we establish a solid - EPO in about 10-12 days.

Overnight runs remind me of our bowl game.  Lots of hope and excitement dashed by the reality that we suck.  

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BooneWX said:

No one should be giving up. These are the same trash models that said it would be 75 today. 

I’m not giving up but I never thought the front end was going to produce there just hadnt been a strong storm signal. It seemed DOA to me even if cold was available. We need to keep blocking for mid to late month and pray PNA actually goes positive which is questionable now 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, NorthHillsWx said:

I’m not giving up but I never thought the front end was going to produce there just hadnt been a strong storm signal. It seemed DOA to me even if cold was available. We need to keep blocking for mid to late month and pray PNA actually goes positive which is questionable now 

Yeah, even if PNA developed as advertised yesterday, there is usually a lag before we see impacts. Now that too is in question.

 

Anyone know how PNA works together with Enso? I would think they would be interrelated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone posted this on another forum so I’m not standing by it as factual but there’s a likelihood this month finishes with the most -NAO monthly value since 2010. To show for that most areas are going to finish NN to slightly BN for temps and below normal for snowfall. And during this period much of the south also one of their if not their hottest December stretch in history. To me this speaks volumes, blocking is AWESOME but with an uncooperative pacific you’re just not going to win. Everyone always gets excited when NAO tanks but as long as Alaska is frozen and that Aleutian high won’t budge, dislodging the pacific trough is going to be tough and you’re going to end up with exactly what we got

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wncsnow said:

12Z is not off to a good start 

Nope. I think a lot of Mets who broke and honked the big storm horn for that 4-11 timeframe are going to be looking for excuses. This has become a punt like we saw 2019-21 where the pattern change keeps getting delayed and then even those drinking hopium look up and it’s March. I’m trying not to be pessimistic but when you’re pointing to indices and analogs and trying to pull something that will happen IF this ridge moves or that so and so and it’s all 2 weeks down the road with models showing nothing positive and it’s January, you’re in a bad spot. We should be seeing fantasy storms and we’re not. It’s not even getting us fantasy rains. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...