Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 04:44 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:44 PM Southern Hemisphere AAO so far this July: 1-Jul-25 1.8937 2-Jul-25 2.248 3-Jul-25 2.8385 4-Jul-25 3.1945 5-Jul-25 2.5837 6-Jul-25 2.1543 The correlation is pretty cool.. right at 90N the following January Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 04:47 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:47 PM 2 minutes ago, GaWx said: NWS DJF 2014-15 probabilities released in 11/2014: best cold chances centered in south Actual 2014-5 DJF vs 1981-2010: coldest in NE not south I'm not picky about this stuff.. I would say that it was a good forecast because it got the West coast ridge, and half of the below average trough. Usually they are at least near by what happens with forecasts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted yesterday at 04:55 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:55 PM 43 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Right....this is a tough pill for some to swallow, apparently. If the seasonal models were showing a warm or torch winter there is exactly 0.0% doubt that the same ones so against it being mentioned would be all over it. It always goes without saying that a model should never be taken verbatim, but wed have all these posts about why the models are catching on to something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 04:58 PM Share Posted yesterday at 04:58 PM 12 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: I'm not picky about this stuff.. I would say that it was a good forecast because it got the West coast ridge, and half of the below average trough. Usually they are at least near by what happens with forecasts. NWS 11/15/2013 probabilities for DJF 2013-4 weren’t all that telling as they underdid the prospects for widespread cold though they hinted ok at where the coldest and warmest ended up being: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:03 PM 9 day lead though.. I'd rather see what their forecasts looked like 3-6 months in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 05:35 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:35 PM 43 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: 9 day lead though.. I'd rather see what their forecasts looked like 3-6 months in advance. Unfortunately, the best I’ve found archived is the 0.5 month lead like I posted. They did pretty well in Nov of 2015 for DJF 2015-6: I give them a B for the US as a whole -They did so-so in Nov 2016 for DJF 2016-7: my grade C for US overall -NOAA did well in 11/2017 for DJF 2017-8: A -They were absolutely awful in 11/2018 for 2018-9: F -2019-20 mediocre at best: C -2020-1 poor: D -2021-2 pretty good: B -2022-3 pretty good: B -2023-4 very good: A -2024-5 lousy: D —————— Summary of my overall US grades of Nov NOAA probabilities for DJF temps: 2013-4: C 2014-5: B 2015-6: B 2016-7: C 2017-8: A 2018-9: F 2019-20: C 2020-1: D 2021-2: B 2022-3: B 2023-4: A 2024-5: D Tally: A: 2 B: 4 C: 3 D: 2 F: 1 NOAA GPA for 0.5 month lead of last 12 DJF for US as a whole: 2.3/C+ (not bad) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted yesterday at 05:40 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:40 PM 1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Seasonal models are never going to accurately depict any anomaly of that magnitude, though....and obviously all of the higher magnitude anomalies have been warm over the past decade, so that is going to cause a cold bias. Go back to the fall of 2014 and show me a seasonal that nailed that anomaly..... I already gave the JMA credit for seeing the record TNH pattern for the 13-14 winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted yesterday at 06:01 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 06:01 PM I feel pretty good about next season not being a complete blood bath is all I mean. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roardog Posted yesterday at 06:09 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:09 PM Quite Frankly, models suck with 2m temp anomalies in the medium range, never mind a seasonal forecast. It's pretty much useless to look at IMO. They are a little better with 850 temp anomalies but not much. It's best to just look at their 500mb anomaly forecasts and that will give you an idea on what temp anomalies would be if that particular map was to come to fruition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaWx Posted yesterday at 06:29 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:29 PM 16 minutes ago, roardog said: Quite Frankly, models suck with 2m temp anomalies in the medium range, never mind a seasonal forecast. It's pretty much useless to look at IMO. They are a little better with 850 temp anomalies but not much. It's best to just look at their 500mb anomaly forecasts and that will give you an idea on what temp anomalies would be if that particular map was to come to fruition. Maybe so, but keep in mind that H5 forecasts are sometimes pretty lousy, themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roardog Posted yesterday at 06:36 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:36 PM Just now, GaWx said: Maybe so, but keep in mind that H5 forecasts are sometimes pretty lousy, themselves. They are but what I'm saying is we often see H5 forecasts that don't make sense with 2m temp forecasts. You'll see a forecast in the medium range for a massive ridge over Alaska in January with a flow directly from the north pole into the northern plains and the 2m temp anomalies will show normal or barely below normal. This is where you look at that map and realize it would be frigid in that location if that actual H5 forecast verified. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted yesterday at 06:54 PM Share Posted yesterday at 06:54 PM SOI is finally getting out of Weak-La Nina territory 6 Jul 2025 1011.51 1014.55 -24.56 TAO/Triton subsurface has warmed a lot.. +1c near the surface.. no more central-subsurface cold pool of any significance 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 7 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Any long range ensemble suite is going to have a smoothed mean....and I know most of the climate guidance is an average of a number of runs smoothed out. This is why you never see 2 feet of snowfall predicated from an ensemble mean at day 7....it doesn't mean it can't happen, nor does it mean that the data doesn't have value. I agree the trend is somewhat important. I hadn't posted this, but meant to relating to the trend issue. Top pic is the Euro seasonal June temp forecast for OND and the bottom is July's forecast for same period. I know 2 months aren't a trend, but again, it's moving toward the Cansip with a non-furnace Canada into the Conus. Plus, AN areas aren't going wild. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Why OND? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago I'm JB because I reported model data?There wasn’t even the slightest bit of seriousness in my post. Clearly a joke 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 11 hours ago Author Share Posted 11 hours ago 10 hours ago, mitchnick said: I hadn't posted this, but meant to relating to the trend issue. Top pic is the Euro seasonal June temp forecast for OND and the bottom is July's forecast for same period. I know 2 months aren't a trend, but again, it's moving toward the Cansip with a non-furnace Canada into the Conus. Plus, AN areas aren't going wild. That looks more like the other guidance with the heat bottled up in the southern planes IVO Texas....more -EPO like. I buy that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 11 hours ago Author Share Posted 11 hours ago 9 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: Why OND? Probably doesn't go out any further? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 7/5/2025 at 3:31 PM, Stormchaserchuck1 said: bluewave by your posts I would surmise that you are saying NYC is going to average 15"/snow/yr from here on out. No matter, regardless. I don't think that's going to happen... we might have a tough few years with the flux of some things still being unfavorable, but weather patterns wax and wane.. eventually we will enter a better pattern, and the global warming isn't that advanced yet. Most of my posts are based on what has already happened over the last 30 to 60 years around NYC Metro. The last 7 seasons with well below normal snowfall are just a small microcosm of this greater pattern with our snowfall over this much longer period. The same way the 09-10 to 17-18 period was. During the colder climate era from the early 1960s to early 1990s my area would get many snowfall seasons near the middle of the range with very few well above or well below seasons. As our climate began to really warm since the mid 90s, the snowfall around NYC has shifted to an all or nothing type of pattern. Very few seasons near the middle of the range anymore with nearly all seasons now well below or well above. Since the mid 90s we have become exclusively reliant on KU benchmark snowstorms to reach average to above average snowfall. So from 09-10 to 17-18 we had a record number of these storms. We were in a transition phase when we began to see extreme winter warmth starting with the +13 December 2015. This carried over into 17-18 with our first 80° winter warmth in February 2018. But the storm tracks still remained cold. So we were getting warm and snowy winters. Things began to shift again in 18-19 with the storm tracks becoming warmer to match the general warmth which began in December 2015. So the storm tracks still warming lagged the general winter warming which began in 15-16. The 7 year period since 18-19 has featured the warmest 7 year winter storm track and lowest snowfall totals. So now we are getting consistently warmer background winter patterns and storm tracks. While this past winter was the first since 15-16 to feature near to slightly below average temperatures, the storm tracks remained warm like they have since 18-19. While the NYC average winter temperature was near 35°, the average temperature on the days that .25 or more of precipitation fell was 41°. So smother well below normal snowfall season. From the early 60s to 90s we had multiple ways to get closer to average snowfall. So we didn’t have to exclusively rely on benchmark KU events. The colder pattern allowed for hugger tracks which dumped heavier snow amounts before mixing to rain. Plus their we’re frequent clipper tracks to our south which have been missing in recent years. So fewer options to get to average snowfall. These days it’s all Great Lakes cutter tracks which are all rain. The hugger tracks are too warm to deliver the heavier snows which got us to normal snowfall in the colder climate. These days the benchmark tracks have been replaced by cutters, huggers, and suppressed Southern Stream storm tracks. Looking forward we have a few options. While the winter warming absent a major volcanic event will continue, it’s uncertain whether we will see at least an intermittent return to benchmark storm tracks again. Scenario #1 is that we shifted into a permanently lower snowfall regime in 18-19 and the low snowfall seasons will become the new normal. Maybe an odd snowy season now and then in the mix. Scenario #2 is a temporary shift to more benchmark tracks and closer to average snowfall later in the 2020s into the early 2030s. But winters would still likely stay warmer even though the storm tracks shifted to colder. We would eventually see another period of declining winter snowfall into the 2030s as the winter warming and warmer storm tracks reduce the snows again. Scenario #3 would be a major volcanic eruption not seen for hundreds or thousands of years. Temporary return to colder and snowier winters. Very uncertain since a reliable long range volcanic forecast still doesn’t exist yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhiEaglesfan712 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago I'd argue the extreme winter warmth started in 2011-12. That's around the time the frequency of record low seasons picked up in Baltimore and DC. Baltimore 2011-2012 0.0 T T T 0.0 T 1.3 0.5 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2012-2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.4 2.9 0.5 3.2 T 0.0 0.0 8.0 2013-2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 2.9 9.8 14.2 12.1 T 0.0 T 39.0 2014-2015 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.3 0.2 5.9 14.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 2015-2016 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 30.0 2.6 2.5 T 0.0 T 35.1 2016-2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.7 T 2.3 0.0 T 0.0 3.0 2017-2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 2.2 2.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 2018-2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 7.8 6.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.3 2019-2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2020-2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.3 5.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 10.9 2021-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 13.3 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 2022-2023 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 0.2 T T 0.0 0.0 0.2 2023-2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 9.1 2.2 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 2024-2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 8.9 3.8 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.7 DC 2011-2012 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 T 1.7 0.3 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2012-2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.2 0.9 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 T 3.1 2013-2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.5 6.6 11.2 12.7 T 0.0 0.0 32.0 2014-2015 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 3.6 9.8 4.9 T 0.0 T 18.3 2015-2016 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 3.1 0.3 T T 0.0 22.2 2016-2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.4 T 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2017-2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.2 0.2 4.5 T 0.0 0.0 7.8 2018-2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 11.5 3.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 2019-2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 2020-2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 2.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2021-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 T 0.9 0.0 T 0.0 13.2 2022-2023 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 0.4 T T 0.0 0.0 0.4 2023-2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.8 0.1 T T 0.0 0.0 8.0 2024-2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.1 8.3 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 However, if you take a closer look at the last 2 years, you'll see an increase in snow. I wonder if this is the start of the tide turning, or if it's just a tease. But it's important to note that Baltimore and DC have seen snow the last 2 years, especially in 2024-25. That didn't really happen much from about 2016-17 to 2022-23. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 6 hours ago Author Share Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, PhiEaglesfan712 said: I'd argue the extreme winter warmth started in 2011-12. That's around the time the frequency of record low seasons picked up in Baltimore and DC. Baltimore 2011-2012 0.0 T T T 0.0 T 1.3 0.5 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2012-2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.4 2.9 0.5 3.2 T 0.0 0.0 8.0 2013-2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 2.9 9.8 14.2 12.1 T 0.0 T 39.0 2014-2015 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.3 0.2 5.9 14.6 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 2015-2016 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 30.0 2.6 2.5 T 0.0 T 35.1 2016-2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.7 T 2.3 0.0 T 0.0 3.0 2017-2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 2.2 2.2 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 2018-2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 7.8 6.1 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.3 2019-2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.3 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 2020-2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 4.3 5.0 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 10.9 2021-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 13.3 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 2022-2023 0.0 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 0.2 T T 0.0 0.0 0.2 2023-2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 9.1 2.2 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 2024-2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 8.9 3.8 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.7 DC 2011-2012 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.0 T 1.7 0.3 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2012-2013 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.2 0.9 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 T 3.1 2013-2014 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.5 6.6 11.2 12.7 T 0.0 0.0 32.0 2014-2015 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 3.6 9.8 4.9 T 0.0 T 18.3 2015-2016 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 3.1 0.3 T T 0.0 22.2 2016-2017 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 1.4 T 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 2017-2018 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.2 0.2 4.5 T 0.0 0.0 7.8 2018-2019 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 11.5 3.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 2019-2020 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 2020-2021 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 2.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2021-2022 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 T 0.9 0.0 T 0.0 13.2 2022-2023 T 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T T 0.4 T T 0.0 0.0 0.4 2023-2024 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.8 0.1 T T 0.0 0.0 8.0 2024-2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T 0.1 8.3 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 However, if you take a closer look at the last 2 years, you'll see an increase in snow. I wonder if this is the start of the tide turning, or if it's just a tease. But it's important to note that Baltimore and DC have seen snow the last 2 years, especially in 2024-25. That didn't really happen much from about 2016-17 to 2022-23. Well, the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 winters were both cold, which is why most consider the super El Nino of 2015 as being the catalyst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 21 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Well, the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 winters were both cold, which is why most consider the super El Nino of 2015 as being the catalyst. I noticed it was warming as early as 09-10. There were some really warm periods in between those storms, and it didn't get down into the 10s like blizzards of the past. I think whatever "hits" takes a few years to be in effect, and that happened well before the 15-16 Strong El Nino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 6 hours ago Author Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 minute ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: I noticed it was warming as early as 09-10. There were some really warm periods in between those storms, and it didn't get down into the 10s like blizzards of the past. I think whatever "hits" takes a few years to be in effect, and that happened well before the 15-16 Strong El Nino. Well, I noticed it was warming back in the 90s, if you really want to get technical. But I think most feel like it accelerated after that 2015 El Nino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 15 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Well, I noticed it was warming back in the 90s, if you really want to get technical. But I think most feel like it accelerated after that 2015 El Nino. That 97-98 season was really something.. I remember being a kid and it didn't snow the entire Winter. Didn't think that was possible. The 2nd half of 96-97 was really warming though, there were buds in the trees as early as late Feb 1997. A storm on 4/1/97 was suppose to give us 12"+ of snow (I was sad it was going to kill all the Spring stuff) but it trended north at the last minute and was only rain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 6 hours ago Author Share Posted 6 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said: That 97-98 season was really something.. I remember being a kid and it didn't snow the entire Winter. Didn't think that was possible. The 2nd half of 96-97 was really warming though, there were buds in the trees as early as late Feb 1997. A storm on 4/1/97 was suppose to give us a 12"+ snowstorm (I was sad it was going to kill all the Spring stuff) but it trended north at the last minute and was only rain. Seriously, though....I know this doesn't just happen overnight....I'm sure that the processess that triggered that post 2015 warm pulse have been materializing for a few decades, but its more recntly that its manifested in a more pornounced and accelerated rate of CC. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago That 97-98 season was really something.. I remember being a kid and it didn't snow the entire Winter. Didn't think that was possible. The 2nd half of 96-97 was really warming though, there were buds in the trees as early as late Feb 1997. A storm on 4/1/97 was suppose to give us 12"+ of snow (I was sad it was going to kill all the Spring stuff) but it trended north at the last minute and was only rain. As bad as 97-98 and 11-12 were, I think the worst of all time was 01-02. If there was ever a winter that was over before it even began, that was the one. Not only was it an absolute torch from November through March, it was also dry as all hell 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormchaserchuck1 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, snowman19 said: As bad as 97-98 and 11-12 were, I think the worst of all time was 01-02. If there was ever a winter that was over before it even began, that was the one. Not only was it an absolute torch from November through March, it was also dry as all hell That was a "no chance" Winter. Things weren't even really that close. There were a few -NAO periods, but they linked up with the SE ridge because -NAO/+EPO can actually be the worst Winter pattern ever because it's dry. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowman19 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago That was a "no chance" Winter. Things weren't even really that close. There were a few -NAO periods, but they linked up with the SE ridge because -NAO/+EPO can actually be the worst Winter pattern ever because it's dry. There was relentless zonal and semizonal flow that entire winter, start to finish. It acted like a huge chinook across the entire CONUS. Thanks in part from the very strong +EPO and also the SPV went raging strong, shrunk and moved directly over the North Pole, once that happened it was lights out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhiEaglesfan712 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I mean, it was only fitting that the torch winter of 2001-02 ended with an early season heatwave in mid-April, as a cherry on top. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michsnowfreak Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago On 7/3/2025 at 4:50 PM, michsnowfreak said: I see what you did there . What a laughable post. Avg Jan temps of 39.5F in cleveland . Only twice have they ever even seen that temp in Jan (1880 & 1932, long ago, so be prepared to be lectured on whats wrong with that data). January and February have been net gains for winter lovers here the past several decades (while Dec has been a net loss). And while its fairly easy for some to just flat out act like the warmer winters/summers pre-1960 didnt exist, its a lot harder to ignore the winters of 2000-2015 and just act like records began in 2016. Because we all remember them. So despite a handful of very mild winters since 2016, still absolutely net gains here for the snowlover. Here is the change in January temperature at every first order site in Michigan and Ohio for their period of record. There is no cherry picking, no leaving out the sites I dont want to use...this is every one for their POR. Every site in OH has grown COLDER except Cleveland. Yes, im aware of site changes and what not. But to assert some magical bump of 15F in avg temp is just wild. MI Grand Rapids: 1894-2025: -0.7F Houghton Lake: 1919-2025: -0.1F Flint: 1921-2025: 0.0F Detroit: 1874-2025: +0.7F Saginaw: 1912-2025: +1.3F Muskegan: 1897-2025: +1.6F Alpena: 1917-2025: +1.6F Sault Ste Marie: 1889-2025: +2.3F Lansing: 1864-2025: +3.5F Marquette 1962-2025: +5.9F OH Dayton: 1894-2025: -3.7F Cincinnati: 1873-2025: -3.0F Youngstown: 1931-2025: -1.9F Wilimington: 1918-2025: -1.8F Toledo: 1874-2025: -1.4F Mansfield: 1917-2025: -1.2F Columbus: 1879-2025: -0.5F Akron: 1888-2025: -0.5F Cleveland: 1871-2025: +0.9F Wanted to follow up on this as I ran the numbers for the Great Lakes region of MI/OH/IN for a nice round number - 100 years. This way every station starts at the same time. Actually, 100 years would seem to be a logical number for many graphs, but in all actuality it is a very unpopular one for the "since 1970" crowd. Im not posting 22 graphs but the numbers are easily verifiable. This shows the January temperature change over the last 100 years, from 1926-2025. Michigan shows essentially no change (+/- 0.5F) while Ohio and Indiana have gotten colder. I included Ann Arbor because while it is not a first order station, it is a station that has remained in the same spot since 1880 (at U of M), so no location change. Although, even a location change cannot account for the outrageous claim of average temperatures rising some 10-15F in NE OH as was alluded to in a previous post. Michigan Houghton Lake: -0.5F Detroit: -0.4F Flint: -0.1F *Ann Arbor: 0.0F Grand Rapids: 0.0F Saginaw: +0.3F Lansing: +0.3F Alpena: +0.4F Muskegan: +1.0F Ohio Dayton: -2.9F Wilmington: -2.8F Cincinatti: -2.0F Youngstown: -1.9F Columbus: -1.4F Mansfield: -1.4F Toledo: -0.8F Cleveland: -0.9F Akron: -0.2F Indiana: Evansville: -1.4F Indianapolis: -1.1F Fort Wayne: -0.9F South Bend: -0.3F 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FPizz Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, snowman19 said: As bad as 97-98 and 11-12 were, I think the worst of all time was 01-02. If there was ever a winter that was over before it even began, that was the one. Not only was it an absolute torch from November through March, it was also dry as all hell 100% agree. As bad as some of the past several winters were here for certain years, that one still takes the cake as the #1 worst. 4" here total Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now