Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

GHD III possible Winter Storm February 1st-3rd


Thundersnow12

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lead storm being stronger is helpful to an extent, but the fact that it hauls ass rather than forming a block over Labrador/N Quebec really limits its usefulness.

 

Going to need the main storm to tread weaker/faster and have less interaction with the energy dropping out of the Canadian Prairies to have a DGEX like solution. So far the more reputable models aren't buying that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parts of N IL get clobbered before a change to rain.

That's the importance of the colder air being much farther south because of Sunday being stronger. Warmer air does rush back north but you also get an increase in baroclinicity due to that which intensifies the frontogenetic response. In addition, a source of wet bulbing from the strengthening northeast flow as the low lifts northeast.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the importance of the colder air being much farther south because of Sunday being stronger. Warmer air does rush back north but you also get an increase in baroclinicity due to that which intensifies the frontogenetic response. In addition, a source of wet bulbing from the strengthening northeast flow as the low lifts northeast.

 

 

That run verbatim is one of the better snow to rain scenarios that I can recall for the LOT area.  Take Geos land for example...heavy snow with big amounts and then driving rain by 120 hours.  Would be interesting and you'd have to wonder if sfc temps would be slower to respond if a lot of slow gets laid down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That run verbatim is one of the better snow to rain scenarios that I can recall for the LOT area.  Take Geos land for example...heavy snow with big amounts and then driving rain by 120 hours.  Would be interesting and you'd have to wonder if sfc temps would be slower to respond if a lot of slow gets laid down.

 

I'm literally on the freezing line at 120 hours.

The position of the rain/snow line didn't really change from the 18z run at 0z Wednesday.

 

gfs_2016012900_120_42.5--88.0.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...