Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,514
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Toothache
    Newest Member
    Toothache
    Joined

March 3-5 Event


windvane

Recommended Posts

My thoughts are, let the snow get here, I'll worry about the stickage, ratios, total accumulations, etc. then. Yes, it's March, with the sun angle and average temps much different from January or early February, with all the differences that can mean during an event, but I 'm not going to fret over those details as long as we can get snow. I shoveled my driveway over the last hour, the residual snow is all melted off of it, some grassy areas will likely reappear this afternoon, but I thoroughly enjoyed the snowfall and it looks great out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

IWM Maps have a very good algorithim actually that calculates ratios based off of modeled atmospheric conditions. They have been far better than WX Bell, SV or any other service people pay lots of money for that just do 10:1 and call it a day. They also don't factor in sleet or other mixed precip as snow like the other maps do. When the bulk of the precip falls Monday night into Tuesday/Wednesday temps at all levels as modeled by the GFS verbatim support higher ratios.

You must be focused on the areas southeast, because along I-95 and certainly NW, the bulk of the snow is earlier than Monday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Todays snow was heavy not light....what if rates are only 1/4 inch an hour monday

 

Not out here it wasn't. Anything but heavy. Maybe a 5 minute burst of moderate but the snow was on the road by then. 

 

sun angle is a bigger issue as the day progresses ;)

 

Thanks for that. Riveting. You guys are acting like we are talking March 30th with the precip foretasted to only fall between 11-4 during the day. From what I'm hearing the moderate pricip falls Sunday night through Monday night. Again, I'm not saying we are going to get anything better than 10:1 ratios but with temps falling into the 20's and possibly teens this snow is not going to melt on contact....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I need to start a march accumulation thread in this subforum also? Cmon philly folks we're better than this banter....keep on topic please.

It is on topic, it is an issue people are discussing related to the storm.   It isn't banter, it is a fair disagreement regarding possible accumulation regarding the storm.  Didn't you cancel winter two days ago anyway?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts are, let the snow get here, I'll worry about the stickage, ratios, total accumulations, etc. then. Yes, it's March, with the sun angle and average temps much different from January or early February, with all the differences that can mean during an event, but I 'm not going to fret over those details as long as we can get snow. I shoveled my driveway over the last hour, the residual snow is all melted off of it, some grassy areas will likely reappear this afternoon, but I thoroughly enjoyed the snowfall and it looks great out there.

Thank You!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is on topic, it is an issue people are discussing related to the storm. It isn't banter, it is a fair disagreement regarding possible accumulation regarding the storm. Didn't you cancel winter two days ago anyway?

jokingly I did and I will eat crow for it. Whenever Ji or I cancel winter we end up with a storm to track lol. Ggem is light on the waa snows but seems to have a decent hit at 144. Would like to see that wave hug the coast just a hair closer though. Maybe it will trend that way?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jokingly I did and I will eat crow for it. Whenever Ji or I cancel winter we end up with a storm to track lol. Ggem is light on the waa snows but seems to have a decent hit at 144. Would like to see that wave hug the coast just a hair closer though. Maybe it will trend that way?

I agree with the WAA part but I would say based on 144 is better than a decent hit.  we shall see. moving really slow for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the ratios won't be great but just a simple looks out the window today shows me that the snow will have no problem sticking to even paved surfaced if the air mass that's being modeled for this storm holds true. It was snowing very lightly this morning with temps in the mid 20's and the roads were covered. The sun angle won't change that dramatically in 4 days. 

 

But look outside your window now.  That snow is long gone now the sun is at its highest.  In January, that stuff would still be swirling around on the roads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But look outside your window now.  That snow is long gone now the sun is at its highest.  In January, that stuff would still be swirling around on the roads. 

 

I'm not arguing the fact that when the sun comes out after the storm is gone the snow will melt much faster than it would in January. All I'm saying is that during the storm, with the clouds, the cold ground from this air mass, and temp in the low 20's to possibly teens, the snow will stick. That's it. I'm not even buying the 15"+ amounts because of how long of a duration the "15" falls. But I think verbatim 10"+ is easily obtainable.  

 

Especially in the N & W burbs where mixing is less of an issue during the onset of the storm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you guys want something positive out of me (which is totally non-meteorological)...  I've got that "sinking feeling".  That feeling that I'll be watching yet another east coast storm from far away.  So you can cheer on that.

Not arguing the details, which can and will change, but the signal is pretty strong for a storm Sunday-Tuesday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But look outside your window now.  That snow is long gone now the sun is at its highest.  In January, that stuff would still be swirling around on the roads. 

agreed, but that isnt how accumulation works.  I dont think anyone is arguing that compaction will keep the amounts on the ground lower than the amount that actually falls.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...