Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,528
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    northernriwx
    Newest Member
    northernriwx
    Joined

NYC/Tri-State Area OBS and Disco


earthlight

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Latest gfs says What cold shot? Each run has been warmer and warmer, looks like mid 50s for Sunday, highs may actually go up to freezing for Monday-Wednesday when originally there were going to be in the low 20s. That pattern for next week looks almost identical to the pattern we were in a week ago with a big warm up on Dec 1 to blocking and colder weather afterward. The only difference may be the orientation of the block, it looks more west based than last week but I don't know if that will change things.

It seems like our pattern has already locked itself in for the past 2 weeks now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest gfs says What cold shot? Each run has been warmer and warmer, looks like mid 50s for Sunday, highs may actually go up to freezing for Monday-Wednesday when originally there were going to be in the low 20s. That pattern for next week looks almost identical to the pattern we were in a week ago with a big warm up on Dec 1 to blocking and colder weather afterward. The only difference may be the orientation of the block, it looks more west based than last week but I don't know if that will change things.

It seems like our pattern has already locked itself in for the past 2 weeks now.

In case your too dense to realize this, highs around freezing with lows around 20 its about 10-12 degrees below normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest gfs says What cold shot? Each run has been warmer and warmer, looks like mid 50s for Sunday, highs may actually go up to freezing for Monday-Wednesday when originally there were going to be in the low 20s. That pattern for next week looks almost identical to the pattern we were in a week ago with a big warm up on Dec 1 to blocking and colder weather afterward. The only difference may be the orientation of the block, it looks more west based than last week but I don't know if that will change things.

It seems like our pattern has already locked itself in for the past 2 weeks now.

This is just a horrible post.....it was always suppose to get warm on sunday with a storm cutting to our west.....looks below 32 to me from tue-sunday......with a storm threat around day 7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case your too dense to realize this, highs around freezing with lows around 20 its about 10-12 degrees below normal.

Compared to what was originally shown, it's going to be a lot warmer than said it would be a few days ago. I know it's still below normal but it's nowhere near as impressive as originally forecast but rather similar to what we've already experienced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just a horrible post.....it was always suppose to get warm on sunday with a storm cutting to our west.....looks below 32 to me from tue-sunday......with a storm threat around day 7

It's a very realistic post, there's definitely more warming forecast before and after the storm than even 2 days ago. The gfs didn't show us getting to 50+ 2 days ago, and if you just compare the last four runs to each other, note that the surface temps for Monday through Wednesday have risen to near 32 for the city.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_ten_078l.gif This is for Monday, highs clearly above 32.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/00/images/gfs_ten_090l.gif This is for Monday from the 0z gfs run, highs definitely below 32.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_ten_102l.gif This is the current gfs run for Tuesday's highs, still below 32 but getting close.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/00/images/gfs_ten_114l.gif This is the 0z gfs run for Tuesday afternoon, high well below 32, probably mid 20s.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/12/images/gfs_ten_126l.gif This is the current gfs run for Wednesday afternoon, highs above 32 for the coast of NJ, just below for NYC.

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod/analysis/namer/gfs/00/images/gfs_ten_138l.gif This was the 0z gfs run for Wednesday afternoon, highs below 32 for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a very realistic post, there's definitely more warming forecast before and after the storm than even 2 days ago. The gfs didn't show us getting to 50+ 2 days ago, and if you just compare the last four runs to each other, note that the surface temps for Monday through Wednesday have risen to near 32 for the city.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_078l.gif This is for Monday, highs clearly above 32.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_090l.gif This is for Monday from the 0z gfs run, highs definitely below 32.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_102l.gif This is the current gfs run for Tuesday's highs, still below 32 but getting close.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_114l.gif This is the 0z gfs run for Tuesday afternoon, high well below 32, probably mid 20s.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_126l.gif This is the current gfs run for Wednesday afternoon, highs above 32 for the coast of NJ, just below for NYC.

http://www.nco.ncep....fs_ten_138l.gif This was the 0z gfs run for Wednesday afternoon, highs below 32 for everyone.

You need to get a grip. It's a 10 day forecast, which has not exactly been all that accurate. By the way, we can flip it the other way. Temperatures are stuck in the mid 30's when guidance 2 or 3 days ago were forecasted in the 40's.

Looks like we got another JI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to get a grip. It's a 10 day forecast, which has not exactly been all that accurate. By the way, we can flip it the other way. Temperatures are stuck in the mid 30's when guidance 2 or 3 days ago were forecasted in the 40's.

Looks like we got another JI.

You mean it's a 5 day forecast. I'm just trying to make a point that the cold shot will be much warmer than originally forecast, that's the point. Will it still be cold, yes, will it still be below normal, yes, will it be unprecedented and brutal, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean it's a 5 day forecast. I'm just trying to make a point that the cold shot will be much warmer than originally forecast, that's the point. Will it still be cold, yes, will it still be below normal, yes, will it be unprecedented and brutal, no.

You aren't making a point. You are throwing up model runs.

Look, this is what you need to do to have any credibility with this argument. Give me a physical reason why you think next week will not be VERY cold. What physically do you think will cause temperatures to not be cold next week. All you did was show that the GFS is glitchy, not exactly a monumental statement.

You remind me of this client I have. Over 70 inches of snow and he said it was a snowless year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean it's a 5 day forecast. I'm just trying to make a point that the cold shot will be much warmer than originally forecast, that's the point. Will it still be cold, yes, will it still be below normal, yes, will it be unprecedented and brutal, no.

Guess that settles it, winter is canceled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You aren't making a point. You are throwing up model runs.

Look, this is what you need to do to have any credibility with this argument. Give me a physical reason why you think next week will not be VERY cold. What physically do you think will cause temperatures to not be cold next week. All you did was show that the GFS is glitchy, not exactly a monumental statement.

You remind me of this client I have. Over 70 inches of snow and he said it was a snowless year.

He is cbw from eastern....got banned there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You aren't making a point. You are throwing up model runs.

Look, this is what you need to do to have any credibility with this argument. Give me a physical reason why you think next week will not be VERY cold. What physically do you think will cause temperatures to not be cold next week. All you did was show that the GFS is glitchy, not exactly a monumental statement.

You remind me of this client I have. Over 70 inches of snow and he said it was a snowless year.

It will still be cold, the presence of low pressure near our area due to the massive block forming will create windy and cloudy conditions that will not allow lows to drop significantly (we see this over the past week where highs were 32-38 degrees and lows only got down into the upper 20s). They will certainly not be lower than they were early this morning unless something changes. What was once a brutal arctic air mass for us has been moderated, there is a lack of snow cover to cause colder weather.

The presence of the ULL is also keeping the cold high pressure further west and making it weaker, therefore moderating our highs as well. This would be a good pattern for a snowstorm had the Pacific been cooperative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will still be cold, the presence of low pressure near our area due to the massive block forming will create windy and cloudy conditions that will not allow lows to drop significantly (we see this over the past week where highs were 32-38 degrees and lows only got down into the upper 20s). They will certainly not be lower than they were early this morning unless something changes. What was once a brutal arctic air mass for us has been moderated, there is a lack of snow cover to cause colder weather.

Just wanted to clarify, are you trying to say that it won't be "as far" below normal because of the clouds? Not trying to have an obnoxious tone, I am asking seriously.

If that is the case, that's pretty silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will still be cold, the presence of low pressure near our area due to the massive block forming will create windy and cloudy conditions that will not allow lows to drop significantly (we see this over the past week where highs were 32-38 degrees and lows only got down into the upper 20s). They will certainly not be lower than they were early this morning unless something changes. What was once a brutal arctic air mass for us has been moderated, there is a lack of snow cover to cause colder weather.

The presence of the ULL is also keeping the cold high pressure further west and making it weaker, therefore moderating our highs as well. This would be a good pattern for a snowstorm had the Pacific been cooperative.

We'll probably get one day that's like 25/15 in KNYC and a few days of 30/20 or so, all big departures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll probably get one day that's like 25/15 in KNYC and a few days of 30/20 or so, all big departures.

You know we talked awhile back about it being a few years since we got a bowling ball system that crossed the country and delivered widespread snow from coast to coast.  We used to have one of those every year.... who knows, maybe with the strong - nao block one of these storms wont be able to cut and we'll get one of those again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wanted to clarify, are you trying to say that it won't be "as far" below normal because of the clouds? Not trying to have an obnoxious tone, I am asking seriously.

If that is the case, that's pretty silly.

The low temperatures won't be all that low. I doubt the city see's teens next week anymore. Obviously cloud cover and strong surface winds will not allow for ideal radiating conditions therefore the lows will be warmer. There's nothing silly about it. I mean seriously LGA had highs 36-38 and the lows still couldn't get down to freezing. I had highs in the mid 30s, but my lows only ranged from 28-30 except the last 2 nights where we see ideal radiating conditions. This is also why we didn't generate significant departures despite the colder weather until the past two days.

After the big warm up on December 1, it took me nearly 6 days to get negative departures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The low temperatures won't be all that low. I doubt the city see's teens next week anymore. Obviously cloud cover and strong surface winds will not allow for ideal radiating conditions therefore the lows will be warmer. There's nothing silly about it. I mean seriously LGA had highs 36-38 and the lows still couldn't get down to freezing. I had highs in the mid 30s, but my lows only ranged from 28-30 except the last 2 nights where we see ideal radiating conditions. This is also why we didn't generate significant departures despite the colder weather until the past two days.

After the big warm up on December 1, it took me nearly 6 days to get negative departures.

LGA had 20's the past 2 nights. LGA gets colder on windier days then radiating days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll probably get one day that's like 25/15 in KNYC and a few days of 30/20 or so, all big departures.

See, all of this surrounds around the error of taking a model word for word several days out with the boundary layer. Will it be 15 or 20 for a low five days from now? No idea, that's why forecasters typically say mid to upper 10's. You get one area of clearing and BAM you are shot. OR, like today you get virga and overcast skies and instead it's 36 rather than 45.

The point is that you can't take these models to heart with boundary layer considerations. The 850 MB temperatures look plenty cold enough and the pattern overall is cold. This whole argument is silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The low temperatures won't be all that low. I doubt the city see's teens next week anymore. Obviously cloud cover and strong surface winds will not allow for ideal radiating conditions therefore the lows will be warmer. There's nothing silly about it. I mean seriously LGA had highs 36-38 and the lows still couldn't get down to freezing. I had highs in the mid 30s, but my lows only ranged from 28-30 except the last 2 nights where we see ideal radiating conditions. This is also why we didn't generate significant departures despite the colder weather until the past two days.

After the big warm up on December 1, it took me nearly 6 days to get negative departures.

MOS was way to warm with this last outbreak and will be again next week, I would think you could cut those numbers by 2-4 degrees especially during the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...