Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,750
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. THIS is how to run a strong Nino December. -NAO gone wild
  2. nice timeframe here with a WB -NAO and 50/50 ULL in place. can see a S/W working under the flow. as the GoA trough retrogrades a bit, then you get a transient +PNA
  3. nice timeframe here with a WB -NAO and 50/50 ULL in place. can see a S/W working under the flow. as the GoA trough retrogrades a bit, then you get a transient +PNA
  4. perhaps the speculation that this may, indeed, act like a Modoki event due to the WPAC warm pool might not be so ridiculous? we shall see
  5. last year had a great December pattern. roll the dice with that look and you'll cash in 8/10 times... just didn't happen last year, what can you do
  6. the fact that the -NAO is showing up at all is the important part. also, we shouldn't have a strong Nina SE ridge influence like we did last year
  7. but! but! this is obviously acting like a canonical event! there could be a PDII redux in December and he would find a way to spin it
  8. that's a run-over-run trend. these are the actual 500mb anomalies... the western trough is pretty common in Nino Decembers that move into Phase 3
  9. one could make the case that 09-10 was strong as well... that winter topped out at +1.6C in NDJ
  10. yeah, it's not cold enough early (unless the GEPS -EPO is right), but seeing the -NAO and SPV perturbation both showing up over the last few days is highly encouraging it would be leading us on the 2002/2009 type track rather than the 1972/1982/1991/2015 track
  11. if we get that -NAO, it bodes well for the rest of the winter. El Ninos with -NAO Decembers looked like this for Jan / Feb:
  12. if we get that -NAO, it bodes well for the rest of the winter. El Ninos with -NAO Decembers looked like this for Jan / Feb:
  13. EPS also making a shift towards much more medium range -NAO blocking
  14. GEFS is also showing a WB -NAO... Pacific isn't great, but good to see the blocking showing up
  15. it would be nice to have a well entrenched definition on this stuff, but it's different everywhere you look. quite annoying for these kinds of discussions I just don't want to see shit on twitter of people declaring this a super event after one monthly reading lmao
  16. lmao I'm just saying that one trimonthly period isn't the actual accepted definition. that has nothing to do with any contest. just saying that when this will be officially classified, it will probably be done as a strong event. I'm not referring to the contest here or anything like that i still have a hard time believing that this even gets to a full trimonthly. maybe it squeaks one out at 2.0 but that's probably it
  17. no, it's five consecutive months. this is the definition i've most commonly seen, but there isn't one that's the gold standard. NOAA classifies El Nino as five consecutive trimonthlies, though. 1997 and 2015 were over 2C for five straight trimonthlies
  18. you know that these anomalies need to persist for months, right? there have to be five consecutive months over 2C for this event to be classified as super
  19. looks like our next potential shot at something as this vort rounds the trough. GEFS picks up on it well this time
  20. looks like our next potential shot at something as this vort rounds the trough. GEFS picks up on it well this time
  21. yeah it looks like models are picking up on heat flux. would like to see this signal push into the medium range
  22. ECMWF extended really dropped the strength of the SPV compared to yesterday... ends up weaker than average for most of December now
  23. ECMWF extended really dropped the strength of the SPV compared to yesterday... ends up weaker than average for most of December now
  24. makes sense given the MJO pass through 7-8-1-2 by the time we get to mid-late month
×
×
  • Create New...