Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. all because some are likely going to miss out on like 1-3” of snowfall. christ
  2. no. it was an analog, but to want to have that year as a bar on its own is going to set you up for failure also, the year isn’t even over, and many of you can clear average in a good 10 day stretch. all of the speculation is silly
  3. if you want this year to get to years like 2010 and 2003 levels, good luck not getting extremely disappointed. those are banner years that are very rare seriously. a year like 2010 might not happen ever again. it didn’t happen in the early 1900s either lmao
  4. i don’t see the point in this kind of retrospective stuff. there’s zero way for us to know. i’m sure there are setups where we would have actually wanted a farther north NS to prevent a phase back then at that point it just becomes straight up overattribution, which is nearly as bad as denial IMO
  5. EPS and GEPS have an even clearer signal. i think any relaxation would be brief, then the Aleutian low develops
  6. seems like we're moving towards some kind of consensus with the EPS moving NW and the GFS SE. CMC still looking good too
  7. you have pretty much everything in place for a major event. just want to see ensemble support
  8. overall pattern progression points towards a significant storm in the northeast. that's probably why
  9. models may be in the process of converging on some kind of consensus with the ECMWF ticking NW and the GFS / CMC moving a bit SE
  10. less suppressive over the lakes... more of the vort is hung back. this was a good step
  11. looks better. more emphasis on the trailing vort rather than that initial piece in the Midwest. heights higher over the east
  12. the GFS still isn't really like the ECMWF. the evolution is the same as the 00/06z runs, but it's just less amped. doesn't do what the ECWMF does with the trough
  13. the GFS still isn't really like the ECMWF. the evolution is the same as the 00/06z runs, but it's just less amped. doesn't do what the ECWMF does with the trough
  14. the GFS and ECMWF still aren't similar. the GFS just didn't amp the trough as much, it didn't change the evolution overall
  15. i don’t think that AK vort is the whole reason. the CMC has the same feature and amps up just fine. i think the ECMWF just struggles consolidating the trough itself
  16. i don’t think that AK vort is the whole reason. the CMC has the same feature and amps up just fine. i think the ECMWF just struggles consolidating the trough itself
×
×
  • Create New...