Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,640
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. also, I don’t need anyone acting like they “saw this coming” for any reason other than pessimism because a) the mood was near ecstatic like 12 hours ago and b) we are eight days out! things will change! christ.
  2. telling people not to completely abandon multiple days’ worth of thinking because of like 3 OP runs is weenie-ish? ok dude. sometimes you have to stick to your guns a bit and let the cards fall further. that’s how forecasting works
  3. dude, i have poo poo’d half the damn winter. I’m also not going to completely shift my thinking in 12 hours from what i’ve been thinking over the last 5 days. if we’re still here on Sunday, yeah, but there’s value in sticking to things a bit and not being so reactionary
  4. throw in the towel at 8 days if you want, but don’t come back if things become more favorable. there are going to be many changes
  5. this is a bit disingenuous. the evolution was completely different compared to when you first made that remark
  6. if you guys want to track a storm from 10-15 days out, this comes with the territory. not sure what else to tell you. storms don’t stay in the bullseye on every OP run for 20-40 runs straight
  7. OP runs are basically ensemble members at this range. chill out
  8. I would still caution against using snowfall means. the 500mb pattern is so good that models will probably come around on that stuff. they already kind of are
  9. NSFW 500mb progression. god damn. great to see the greatest anomalies to our south as well
  10. the ebbing -NAO is often the driver for some of the most prolific storms in NE US history
  11. NSFW 500mb progression. god damn. great to see the greatest anomalies to our south as well
  12. GEFS looks better than 06z. kicking the S/W east faster, blocking is stronger
  13. the GEFS is disagreeing with the strength of the main S/W by a ton at like 5 days lmao. I think the GFS just got it wrong. its ENS doesn’t even agree with it
  14. also the GEFS is disagreeing with the strength of the main S/W by a ton at like 5 days lmao. I think the GFS just got it wrong. its ENS doesn’t even agree with it
  15. my point was that even with a solution that would normally be an absolute catastrophe, it still manages to almost pull it off. that’s the sign of a really good pattern
  16. I’m not focusing on the specifics at this range… just that the general evolution is the same and just as potent
  17. even after allllll that, the GFS still redevelops. we literally get a coastal from this. that’s why this pattern is so good. you can still get a somewhat favorable end result from garbage
  18. look at these run-to-run changes. it’s just a cracked out OP run. look at the consistency of the CMC/ECMWF and whatever the hell that is. just follow the ensembles
  19. yup, the CMC is insane, very similar to 00z yesterday
  20. also the CMC is still absurd. might be to the west verbatim but I don’t care. this is sick at 500mb and closely resembles 00z
  21. this is why I hate hate hate when people say -NAOs are overrated. bullshit. this thing would be over the Dakotas and we’d be in the 70s if not for it instead, it might actually force a 3 sigma trough to the south. unreal
  22. any strong wave versus this block is basically an immovable object versus a not completely unstoppable force (the vort). a block of this magnitude will win the vast majority of the time look at the persistent negative height anomalies from the gyre in the N Atl
×
×
  • Create New...