Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    5,669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. ECMWF looks a bit better with more separation between the ULL and S/W of interest... more ridging in the SW US as well. we need the ULL to buckle and create a semblance of a +PNA if we want any chance for a larger storm here EPS is doing the same... good to see that trend reverse
  2. in terms of climo, just from a statistical standpoint, the odds of seeing anything more than plowable on the week of the 20-27th are about the same as the 13-20th. the dynamic outcomes of the seasonal transition probably outweigh the sun angle stuff. it's really the week of the 27th into April when things fall off a cliff
  3. they were good, just not enough. GFS has been absolutely lost with this setup, though
  4. it’s one run, this is 6 days out, and this is still a strong signal. jeez
  5. yeah, the GFS doesn’t buckle that ULL off the BC coast, it’s an outlier in that regard. pretty much every other model does. it has a fundamentally different evolution
  6. hahaha honestly, you got it down pat. I do think that you guys can certainly see appreciable snow out of this, but it will be tougher with a more Miller B type setup however, if the wave digs enough like on the EPS, you guys can cash in, would just take more doing. however, this kind of 500mb setup favors NYC northward we will see, though! there are 6 more days and hopefully we can get this thing to dig and really bomb out for a DCA-NYC-BOS storm
  7. watch how the block forces the S/W underneath... it leads to rapid intensification and negative tilting. big signal for a strong Miller B heights are actually decreasing out ahead of the trough due to the confluence! very dynamic setup verbatim
  8. watch how the block forces the S/W underneath... it leads to rapid intensification and negative tilting. big signal for a strong Miller B heights are actually decreasing out ahead of the trough due to the confluence! very dynamic setup verbatim
  9. if we can get that ULL sitting over BC to buckle and interact with the ULL in the Pacific and buckle the PNA... would be explosive. that's pretty much what the ECMWF did
  10. it is a complete outlier and is trending towards the other models. i have no reason to trust it at this point also, the trend this winter has been to strengthen the Pacific jet, if anything, so the trends towards other model guidance make sense IMO
  11. this event seems to come down to how zonal the Pacific jet is. the GFS is trending towards a more zonal Pacific jet, which helps boot the S/W out of the west instead of letting it dig. this is key to getting a coastal storm here the trend is continuing on the 12z GFS... look at the E PAC ridge weakening and the increase in interaction between the S/W and ULL over the Pacific. look off of the CA coast. the increased strength of the PAC jet leads to a much weaker S/W this run
  12. as a result of that tiny change in the strength of the Pacific jet, the GFS is much less amplified out west
  13. it seems to be how zonal the Pacific jet is. the GFS is trending towards a more zonal Pacific jet, which helps boot the S/W out of the west instead of letting it dig. this is key to getting a coastal storm here the trend is continuing on the 12z GFS... look at the E PAC ridge weakening and the increase in interaction between the S/W and ULL over the Pacific. look off of the CA coast
  14. not all events are the same. the GFS is clearly the outlier and will be treated as such
  15. nah, it was improved. not much change in sensible weather, but it was a step in the right direction
×
×
  • Create New...