Jump to content

Carvers Gap

Members
  • Posts

    15,671
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Carvers Gap

  1. There are continued hints right now of a strong amplification of an eastern trough between Christmas and Elvis's birthday - that has been discussed by many including Jeff.
  2. The only thing that makes me wary, is at one point we had winter storm after winter storm lined-up on modeling through the 18th - poof. The good thing is that the 18th appeared at one time to be the demarcation point when winter would flip warm. Looks like that window will potentially quite brief. All of that said, I have low confidence going forward with really any ideas. As noted in an earlier post, the MJO might eventually work in our favor. However, if it takes the tour...it is going to come back to 4-6 eventually. That said, some empirical wave proportions charts and OLR stuff looks quite good in the LR. I can see where some are starting to see cold on the horizon. I just don't have confidence about duration - would lean cold through mid-Jan with a thaw...and then maybe one last ride in Feb. I think we could all live with that. Of note the Weeklies look good for 3-4 weeks before flipping decidedly warm in the East....take with a grain of salt as they have been pushing pack the warm-up.
  3. There have also been signs of the NAO and EPO being negative at the same time later this month. I think one thing we may have to contend with is the MJO going high amplitude into warm phases in mid-late Jan - but that is way, way out there. I like Jeff's potential window later this month into early January. Great comments by John as well.
  4. Definitely been seeing PNA and/or EPO combos after Christmas in LR modeling. They may be just a one or two week event, but that would fit what you have read. I don't know a ton about mountain torque(makes me wonder what our own mountains do downstream after high wind events?), but had read a little as well over the weekend about that.
  5. Yeah, modeling seems to hint at a trough amplification around or after Christmas.
  6. Potential recipe for trouble where cold air banks up against the western side of the Valley against the Plateau. Both the 12z RGEM and 3K NAM show this to some extent, which to me is amazing that modeling can do that. When a low sits to our SE and we have marginal air masses that dip below freezing overnight, sometimes precip can lock the cold against the valley floor. Then the winds out of the east push that cold into pools against the mountains. Doesn't happen often, but it does happen. Very difficult to forecast. MRX does have a mention for extreme NE TN and SW VA. My point and click this AM, had me with a mix for much of the morning on Weds. Just have to wait and see. Tricky forecast. I don't expect any significant ice accumulation, but ANY ice accumulation on roadways is a royal pain in the butt.
  7. It has been a good seven years. Happy Birthday, TN Valley Sub-Forum!!!!! In honor of this, I am bumping a seven year old thread!!!! LOL. May there be many more. Truly one of the best places on the internet.
  8. The 18z RGEM(beginning at hour 60) implies that there may be some slick spots during storm #2 in valley locations. Not sure I buy it, but is definitely on the model. Cold is quickly scoured out, but it does imply that there may be initial ice or mix north of 40 and along the I-81 corridor. I am absolutely not calling for that, but just wanted to give it a mention. Don't see a lot of evidence on other modeling, but the RGEM has been decent in recent years.
  9. I do think WxBell is a bit generous with its snow algorithms on the 3hr and 6hr maps. Here you go for middle and west areas of the subform...Also, nice look for areas of SE KY and SW VA.
  10. Euro 12z WxBell snow algorithm definitely showing snow showers for much of west and middle TN for storm one. Storm two - rainer...though extreme NE TN/SW VA is not written in stone for this one yet I don't think. If DC is getting a good track, sometimes TRI can get in on that. Anyway, storm one has anywhere between. .5 - 2" from a line from Memphis to the northern Plateau.
  11. Yeah, I normally like seeing storms underneath. Always think the NW shield delivers, even if marginally. I was wondering why that wasn't showing up. Looks like the slp is a bit deeper.
  12. Saw the same thing and laughed. Bout the only positive from that which I see, is that it must be cold for it to snow that far south....plenty of time for that to trend NW, right?
  13. CFSv2 heads to colder phases which is likely why it is so cold. Definitely was a bias of this model last year, BUT it is not an unreasonable option. It also illustrates where the pattern "could" go if the MJO were to head to 7, 8, and 1.
  14. Bout the only thing I have tonight after looking at a very boring set of ensembles and operationals going out to two weeks...the MJO has surged into phase 4. The CA OLR map really looks like the MJO is heading for phases 7 and 8 after that. So, this may sound weird, but I sort of want the MJO to gain a bit of amplitude and rotate on around - looks like a real possibility. That would imply the PNA(which we are seeing return on some LR modeling) might be a factor in a couple of weeks - when it is great climo for cold.
  15. Now, what the EPS is cooking up at lunch will play. PNA ridge after 300.
  16. Just looking at the LR, really nothing new. There are some hints the Pacific may get its act together during the first part of January - CFSv2 extended. The run of the GEFS extended breaks down the pattern in early Jan, but then WxBell stops the run. WxBell has been really "buggy" for the past few weeks. For you all using pay sites, who are you using? I am not unhappy with WxBell, but if the site continues to be buggy I will take my business elsewhere. I think we are going to have to have a resupply of cold air if we are going to get a forum wide storm at lower elevations. Though currently, the 0z CMC and 6z GFS do imply ice for NE TN for the second storm. Holston, that second storm indeed looks like a Miller B on some models and those usually bring rain to the forum area. For the models which don't have energy transfer(or have less), NE TN sees ice or snow or both. Not sure I buy ice here (at least for extended amounts of time). We do get light icing at times if the storm moves in during an inversion, but that usually gets scoured before serious damage is done. Models often make the mistake of bleeding cold air into the TRI from the NE when the mountains usually just won't allow it. Sometimes it can get to Abingdon, but that is about it. I will add that when DC gets in the slot for snow, often snow accumulations will begin in NE TN and work NE into the Mid-Atlantic. So, for the extreme NE TN corner...these have to be watched. Just depends on how quickly that low gets its act together.
  17. @John1122, we have even had snow during mid-early December. I think twice during the last 11 years, 09-10 and a couple of years ago. I think the December snow days a couple of years ago were Kingsport's first in nearly four decades(could be more). Those were both really big snows. I think you have noted that early season storms seems to be the trend of late.
  18. Starting to become more of the opinion that we are going to need another strong cold shot of air into our region. Marginal systems at this time of year at lower elevations and at this latitude are just tough to get much mojo from. That said, within the next two weeks, we get to much more favorable climatological norms, and that helps.
  19. 12z EPS much better looking this run d10+ with a small PNA ridge and NAO block. We can live with that.
  20. Not sure if it is the WxBell algorithm, but it has snow for the first system over SE KE, the Plateau of TN, and SW VA, and the Smokies. 2-3" of snow on the Plateau.
  21. The 12z CMC is close to a big storm for Weds in this area...very big for MA and NE.
  22. And to quote a famous poster of the TN Valley..."When we start talking about the MJO, that is usually not a good sign."
  23. Thought I might take some time to look at why we are seeing some variability in modeling in the long range this morning. Grabbed the CA OLR map (outgoing long wave radiation). The cooler areas on the map indicate higher cloud tops and signal more convection(t-storms). The first image is the CA(constructed analog) OLR map. You can see the IO (Indian Ocean) go very quiet as the wave propogates(moves) from the MC to the dateline. As a quick note, the MJO's favorable phases for winter weather are near the dateline(180). So, days 11-15 would see the MJO move into phase 7(and maybe even 8,1) which is colder in NDJ (DJF is warm). So, the phase 7 is sort of in-between the DJF and NDJ by late month, and that causes a washed out signal since one three month analog is warm(DJF) and the other is cooler (NDJ). The second map is from the GEFS. The OLR there is locked into the MC(Maritime Continent) for the foreseeable future. How modeling is handling the Indian Ocean and the MC is not consistent among different models IMHO. Some models are taking the MJO through 4 to 5 to 6 and one would guess...7. The EMON rotates through the circle of death. The CA rotates at higher amplitude to 7. The GEFS stalls the MJO. In other words, models are all over the place with the MJO. Take one look at the 500 maps for the major ensembles this AM, and you will see the model spread. All of that said, we "might" see a more conducive Pacific later this month or even by January. As I noted yesterday, if we can use the -NAO to bridge to the a better Pacific set-up later on...we might have a chance to stay seasonal(or slightly above) until the next legit cold shot - and that is a win if we like winter. Why? Normal or even slightly above will get the job done later this month. Right now, I don't think I buy much after d15 - cold or warm. I would say my confidence level is low. If forced, I would say we will continue to see weaker heights over the SE for the foreseeable future with some ridges rolling through. I do think there is a chance (if the -NAO verifies and we get even a temporary PNA or EPO) that we could see some colder temps rotate through. I think the problem right now is the Atlantic block is muting what would otherwise be a total torch. Computer models, like humans, are trying to figure out how much of an influence that block is going to have. At the very least, we are going to likely see an active and stormy patterns with cutters and some Miller A(with marginal cold...increasingly colder as December averages take hold) stuff. References: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/mjo.shtml (CA stuff) https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/Composites/Temperature/ (phase correlation map of MJO to NA wx per three month increments) https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/what-mjo-and-why-do-we-care (phases of MJO by longitude) https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/CLIVAR/clivar_wh.shtml (various model output for the MJO)
  24. On a positive note, the CFSv2 Seasonal(not the CFS extended) this morning flipped cold for January. No idea if that holds in future runs as it bounces around, but it has been solid in the warm camp for January for some time. One thing to watch for is that the GEPS has shifted (around Christmas) the AN height field into Nova Scotia vs Greenland - looks temporary but that would pump an EC ridge if true. Again, I really don't like losing the EPS in the LR as it has reverted back to its original warm solution along the EC around Dec 21 which is just three days later than the steadfast runs of the week before(never ending warm). And again, it is holding a low in the Southwest which is often a miserable error that it often repeats. American modeling is colder(surprise!) while other modeling has backed-off the nice 500 pattern in varying degrees after the 20th. Could just be a wobble...time will tell. Last winter has me gun shy.
  25. Not a fan of where the 0z EPS went last night in the LR. I really hate playing the "low gets stuck in the SW" game with that model. Huge bias, but sometimes it is right. Most other modeling looks good in the LR, but EPS makes me a bit nervous. As for the Monday system, same playbook as the last system on almost all modeling, and I am not sure why that happens - massive NW shift. Now, lets' see if it doesn't start coming back SE later tonight and tomorrow. If we get snow, looks like the Plateau would be the spot. NE TN is out of this one unless it goes eastward - and I am not ruling that out.
×
×
  • Create New...