Jump to content

snowman19

Daily Post Limited Member
  • Posts

    7,409
  • Joined

Everything posted by snowman19

  1. I was at a funeral yesterday when it was snowing that’s why I wasn’t posting during the storm. But thanks for asking. Troll
  2. The EPS is literally all over the map for next weekend, there is no clear trend on it at all to say the least lol
  3. Rockland was a disgrace. There is no way the DPW crews did not know it was coming. It was advertised 24 hours before and a WWA was posted. They should have been on the roads salting everything before it even started, instead they went out after it was already a disaster and played catch up. There were accidents galore that morning
  4. The operational GFS at day 12….that model can’t figure out what’s going to happen 12 hours from now let alone 12 days….
  5. For Rockland: November: 0 snow, December, way above average temps and 0.5 total snow! Absolutely superb cold and snowy forecast lol
  6. The real fail was the cold and snowy late November and December forecasts, that was an epic bust. I didn’t know there was a test for January, but February sure is not looking too good as of right now and there is a lot to back that up and growing…..
  7. The big test will be the tail end of this month and February….there are growing signs that the current pattern is going to flip in a big way as we enter February:
  8. The end of January is the transition time period (convection firing in the Indian Ocean) where there will likely be some kind of winter storm, be it snow, ice or a combination of the 2:
  9. Simple reason, we had a major SSW last year and the La Niña never coupled. Neither one of those happened this time
  10. It looks like the cold could possibly hold into late January with the MJO stuck in phase 7 with -GLAAM. Will be interesting to see what happens the tail end of the month, like post 1/25:
  11. Looks like Upton is going with the Euro/EPS for their snowfall forecast. This just got issued: https://www.weather.gov/okx/winter
  12. My concern would be this if we really lose the PAC side, showing a ++NAO for the remainder of winter:
  13. The revert back to -PNA/RNA makes sense given the coupled Niña background state and severely negative PDO, you aren’t sustaining +PNA for very long. What Eric explains would basically fit canonical La Niña climo (in the absence of any SSW to shake things up) for late January and February:
  14. Agree with you. It’s a 1-3 event, which we said before is a win when you are into the first week of January with less than an inch for the season
  15. With how this winter has gone so far, take 1-3 inches and run with it, I’m sure no one will be complaining. I only have 0.5 inches total up here, first time I can ever remember it being this bad at this time of the season
  16. The fact that the EPS is even further east and weaker than the op is a bad sign. I’m batting a 1,000, thought this would trend west. I guess that very fast, progressive flow will not be denied. Also think this last storm helped to push the baroclinic zone well off shore. I should have known better when last night’s Euro was basically a non event. The Euro may have its moments of being wrong, but I seriously doubt it’s completely out to lunch this close in, especially when the Ukie, RGEM and CMC are showing a very similar scenario.
  17. He’s right. I’ve felt all along this event was going to possibly end up as an inland runner for a few reasons
  18. The 6z EPS is really tucked in. With no -NAO block and a SE ridge, the risk here is an inland runner IMO, could be wrong, but I think that’s the risk
  19. A little over 3 days away and the Euro and GFS with completely different depictions of what is going to happen Thursday night/Friday morning lol let’s see who wins this one. I will say this, now that today’s storm really blew up more than expected up the coast, it may help to push the baroclinic zone way off shore. Guess we’ll see
  20. That northern fringe is going to be fighting very dry air as per soundings. A lot of what is shown is probably going to be virga
  21. Not sure why he thought what he posted somehow invalidates your previous post that it turns mild for a time before that but whatever…
  22. Yea, I figured the GFS was doing it’s normal, notorious wave spacing screw up….it was the only model showing it. I was wrong lol
×
×
  • Create New...