Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    72,399

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    Be careful assuming ingest of drier continental air upon approach....thre is a mositure feed from central America.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Wouldn't building of ridge trend it west?
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    Your only shot is a track far enough west.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    Doesn't have time for an ERC....watch.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    Now that is a catastrophic ensemble suite.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Nah, too far west on that run
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    NO needs the bend back more westward in the GOM because right now eastern envelop is favored.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    Odds are they won't get the very worst of it, but I felt it prudent to really emphasize the danger because its perfectly feasible
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    Strong most likely? Good luck.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    This is why the majority of the most intense US LFs are not long tracker CV storms...that, and less chance for recurve.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    That, to me, is the fun of forecasting....hedging when to over/under cut guidance. No one with a true passion for weather vomits model output in any event of relevance.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    Agree
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    There are also times when the models are overzealous...again, forecaster needs to blend meteorological breadth of perspective/experience with foundational knowledge to synthesize a superior forecast...machines can not do that.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    They are not the ACE makers, but they are the cinema.
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Models struggle in extreme scenarios and don't always adequately account for all meteorological phenomena...its like during winter, when models will print out cirrus over the Berkshires with a 970mb tempest just inside of the benchmark. Its incumbent on the forecaster to account for mid level features. Same deal here...intensity guidance can not entirely resolve what is beginning to happen and what will transpire over the course of the next 36-48 hours. The forecaster needs to.
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    The key to my forecast is that I don't think this has much time to complete an ERC, but even if it does, we will just trade some wind impact for more surge. This one will rank up there.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    Little without higher terrain passage.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Funny, Michael was one of the big five (along with Katrina, Andrew, Camille and Labor day '35) that I referenced in my forecast for cat 4-5 landfall yesteday.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    Michael was one of the big five that I cited in my forecast for a reason. Sit back, and enjoy the show.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    Exactly right. I called for it yesterday, but someone like me can do that because no once cares what I do and the lives of thousands don't depend on it. I totally get why the NHC plays it the way that they do.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    True....somewhat. That scenario is not ideal for realizing max surge potential.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think that is the key to the intensity forecast...JMHO, but I feel the only way that time is much of an impediment is if the core is severely disrupted by higher terrain over Cuba, which as of now is unlikely.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    All the reduced time frame does is limit chances to complete an ERC. This is why the majority of the most intense US landfalls are not long tracking CV storms....wild card being the degree of interaction with higher terrain over Cuba.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
×
×
  • Create New...