I initially though Wankum was just lazy and dumbing things down, but the more I listen, the more I feel he really believes that. He is consistently emphatic about it.
Will didn't vote, but I know he can only make the 13th. Let me put it this way...who plans to attend Saturday and would not be able to, or would not, do the 13th??
Yea, looks festive in my area...you can see it dwindle once I hit 495, and then scarce patches inside of 128. Must be all that elevation I have in them thar hills of Methuen.
Steve is a candidate to get angered by that, too. My rule of thumb is if you are left equivocating with your schmenzer in your hand when asked exactly what you're tracking, then you aren't really tracking anything, and should expect nothing.
Yep....Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Most boring "active" pattern I've ever seen. The three most prevalent words on the forum right now are inverted, trough and trying...all you need to know.
I'm so sick of the social mediaologists advertising "wild times"....GTF outta here with that. If I can't see "wild" out my window, and I have to look at the thermometer, then that isn't wild. Wait until a major storm is consistently modeled.
When you consider when I published, it absolutely was. The precip type was modeled as excessively white for my area on Sunday night. As far as underperforming in the snow area, if you mean relative to clown maps...sure. But I would argue that was better modeled than the warm layer given that snow growth was consistently modeled as inferior..that is always red flag against heavier totals.