Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    78,831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. I think these changes are entirely immaterial with the degree of warmth throughout ENSO.
  2. No one thought it was right with a straight Modoki in the seasonal mean.
  3. Go back and search...he literally calls for East coast bullseye every season.
  4. The arctic outbreak INVO VD Day was pretty remarkable.
  5. I'd bet against this being once in a lifetime given the acceleration of CC....it's not a coincidence.
  6. QBO is a great forecasting tool....I've been killing it the past couple years integrating the QBO with solar cycle.
  7. I understand all of that....and I have tried to explain to you that you are taking that composite far too literally....it's not a forecast composite....it does't even incorporate the extra tropical Pacific. It's literally just a composite derived from solar, QBO and ENSO data, as that is how I assess the polar fields.
  8. Yes, generating clicks....which is often the antithesis of sound meteorology. Same crap-maps every year...without fail. I know to ignore him, but the masses don't know any better.
  9. God, I can't stand him...biggest hack there is.
  10. He was okay on a seasonal level, but I remember he initially rushed the flip back to cold in January. He kept to trying to go cold again first week and I knew it would take until mid month. At least he owned it.
  11. Yes, those are the brief shots of possibly historic cold. Probably January, then wave 1 reflection triggers a flip of the ride to Greenland and the -NAO will be more protracted. See Jan-Feb 1983.
  12. Oh, okay....agreed. I thought you were implying that it may literally be negative...no way in hell. I agree that it could be boot leg.
  13. Yes we can; it's gong to be positive. I'll bet you $500 right now- There is absolutely zero doubt in my mind. The PDO is another story, as that is much more nebulous.
  14. Actually viewing the data that you're using is overrated.
  15. I think that tells you all you need to know in terms of seasonal temp anomaly, which really only has about a 1/10 chance of being cold in this modern era, anyway...so it really doesn't tell you much.
  16. @raindancewxMakes perfect sense to me....1997 obviously for ENSO given intensity, but the rest are great polar analogs...only one I don't have is 2018, but that will probably be there when I do the extra tropical Pacific next month.
  17. You missed my point. I agree it favors the mid atl for above average snowfall, that isn't my point. The "equal chances" stance is crap. Make a call. I'm not directing this specifically at you.
  18. Yea, basically 1982-1983. 2005 was a top 3 season in SNE....I don't expect that.
×
×
  • Create New...