Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    76,248

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    It is, it's just an unwritten weenie rule to refrain from tossing out numbers at this point.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Henry's psychedelic Weather.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    I am working on an update and pulled up that graphic only to see tepid support, much to my chagrin...until I realized I had left the window open and was viewing guidance from the 16th. FYI, refreshing that page will not update it...need to manually set run if you leave it open. lol
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    This would lend itself to a protracted, moderate event in all likelihood....boring AF.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    I've never seen so much long range NAM analysis and hedging.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    2-1.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    That route is fine for eastern areas, at least.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    I wasn't there then, but I imagine it was worse. Regardless, it sucks now.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    Working on this in tandem with January wrap today.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    Very insightful, and dead-on.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    Snow growth should be better this weekend....it was lacking until that final stanza Monday night in this past event.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    0.7". Thanks.
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Even that QPF chart, as is, argues for prolific deformation from like Steve up through my area here in the MRV....crude rule of thumb is right near the QPF gradient, which at this range is only detecting lower level forcing.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    Looks like 0.6" here? Do you slightly further N? TIA.
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Do you feel dirty?
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    I can tell you how I would cope if this ever missed...working in the the outskirts of Boston proper (Chelsea) is a logistical nightmare right now with all of the snow. It's really testing my resolve with regard to the snow obsession.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    I wonder if the CFS incorporates more of that analog data...no clue, just thinking out loud, as that would explain the violence.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    Well, it probably whiffed....not that it's beneath him.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think barring a significant regression, you can start tuning up the plows EOR because I don't see how this doesn't get banding well west of model depictions....again, assuming it doesn't verify further east.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    It's also important for us in the east as far as high-end potential is concerned.....I would cap things around a foot if it were to close off so far south.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think worst case is my nightmare scenario that played out 4 years ago with the deform band handing just east of me, but could very well end up west.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'll bet DZ ends up well west of me...worried up a Boxing Day outcome with low level fronto pinned to coast, but that's a concern for late week.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    I do.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    Almost time for to draft, anyway, stop looking for snow.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    IDK if anyone read my blog post from yesterday, but I laid out the reasons why I think that will take place....aside from the fact that the depth of this thing is exotically anomalous as is, which is tacit.
×
×
  • Create New...