All Activity

You are correct.

March Average Temperature Trends

February Average Temperature Trends

they're 19W/6L in their last 25 games ... . Really, if you look at the numbers ... a lot of this torrid pace began around the time or shortly after two things happened: Roman came up from the minors; Bello and Buehler started pitching better. Everything else being more or less plausible, those two factors appear to correlate rather well. So ...yeah, they should scare Roman away like the typically do with talent. heh

As a sneak peek into the updated data, charts, analytics and information I will post below the actual raw monthly temperature trends now updated through 2025 for the months of January through July. Of note only one of those months shows a warming trend since way back in the 1890's - February!

winter is coming

Excited to share that my website is about to relaunch with a new modern look (been the same since 1999!!) with all the climate information and analytics you could ever crave for Chester County PA. Stay tuned! http://www.chescowx.com

HAHA ... probably 70F at 15K feet

Always amazing seeing the slopes being totally different looks in summer and winter Sent from my SM-S166V using Tapatalk

80/63 Getting a little dewy. But we’ll allow it, vibes up with the Roman Anthony extension for Red Sox.

I thought pools were not in play with dews less than 70?

She come

Don I'm interested only in solutions that have a possibility of working. The USA going carbon neutral TOMORROW won't solve this problem. The USA can geoengineer the solution on its own. Why do we need their permission? Does China ask us for permission to pollute the atmosphere? Did they ask permission to build roughly 250 coal plants over the last 10 years? Who's to say the aerosols caused the monsoon to fail? Why can't it be greenhouse gas induced climate change that did it? Nothing will get solved as long as 90% of the problem lies outside the USA's borders. If they can pollute the atmosphere freely, then we can inject aerosols into it if we want to as well.

I fully support your spidey sense..Make it so

Right I'm not so sure though we could ever muster up that much MLCAPE here. I mean that EML progged is about as stout as an EML you'll see really (700-500 lapse rates ~ 8.5-9 C/KM!!!!, and will be atop dews well into the 70's. I think we'll eventually see a moderate risk there. Anyways, when we get EMLs they tend to be on the weakening side and are generally ~7-7.5 C/KM. But I mean how common it has become to push 70+ dews in here (and earlier in the season now) its feasible we could get a setup with MLCAPE maybe pushing 4000-4500. If we ever saw something larger with a legit setup...we may legit blow down like 30% of the trees in the region

Oh 100% some necessary dynamic would be missing here

Just had time to watch this. I don’t think any are truly resistant. Some just find a way to avoid the spores for a long time. There was an original tree in Farmington, NH that they were hand pollinating with that I believe started succumbing in recent years. There’s another one in Maine that they found when flying over the forests as well. The further north you get the more it seems the blight is less intense. There’s planted trees from the 1800s in Wisocnsin that are finally beginning to bet hit by the westward spreading blight as well. There’s high elevation trees in the Appalachians that are mature and producing viable nuts so it has struggled going “upward”. SUNY ESF is going to be distributing their Darling 54 gene edited tree soon. I’ve soured on that project in recent years. I liked what the woman was doing in the video with growing out saplings and injecting them with a dose of blight to test their resistance in a controlled environment.

I can’t say I disagree. Sorry, @Carvers Gap, I know this doesn’t help with your latest inquiry.

A handful of U.S. representatives did so, but they are deflecting from their own policy responsibility. Tom Tiffany and Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin and Michelle Fischbach, Brad Finstad, Pete Stauber and Tom Emmer of Minnesota signed a letter to Canada's Ambassador to the U.S. complaining about Canada's wildfire smoke. All but Stauber reject the reality of climate change. Stauber claims to accept it but to want a technology-based solution rather than fossil fuel phaseout, but even that position isn't credible. He voted in favor of this year's reconciliation bill that guts the technology-based climate solutions from the Inflation Reduction Act. They are posturing. Finally, regarding geoengineering with its attendant risks (e.g., impact on India's monsoon season) and limitations (does nothing to stop ocean acidification), if the world's nations cannot agree on a binding straightforward solution to a basic physics problem behind the causes of climate change, it's highly unlikely that they would agree to a more complex agreement on geoengineering that would set food-sharing provisions e.g., if India's monsoon fails, other set binding approaches for addressing other major contingencies that could arise. Moreover, the caliber of the world's leaders doesn't compare to those of the 1980s or 1990s when the acid rain and ozone issues were addressed and the international processes e.g., COP conferences, are corrupted by allowing major polluters full standing to shape the outcomes.

I'll take the smoke

June Averages since 1893

See, I've got pretty good company here. Hansen is more than a little skeptical of what the IPCC says, suggesting a climate sensitivity much higher than supposed (4.5C v. 3C).

The signals are vague and way out in time, but I don't like this one bit. My spidey sense tells me a hurricane is a-commin.

And now he might go to the YOOKAY

Here, it would come with zero forcing / lifting features...