Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,654
    Total Members
    25,819
    Most Online
    Donut Hole
    Newest Member
    Donut Hole
    Joined

Napril 2026 Discussion/Obs


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, SouthCoastMA said:

Models suggest lower heights / cutoff low after next weekend around Newfoundland, with blocking near Greenland evident. Would kinda suck in eastern areas if thats true. Still plenty of time for that to change, and until then we enjoy the next 10 days. 

Signs late April into early May might not be terribly warm in New England. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp ... I was wrong about March when it comes to predicting the product result, below.  I had presumed recently that we'd result a more obvious local geographic ( 'local' relative to the whole world) cool zone/island anomaly relative to the whole "inferno" that is clearly and coherently, unarguably the product's character below... eh hm.  Said island had been a persistent leitmotif since late last autumn... 

Still, you know, it really didn't sensibly come off that way?  I recall seeing March colder than the whole country - in fairness I think what is actually going on is that this product below is the "anomaly".  What we experience was a warm anomaly, but just not as demonstrative or obviously so as everywhere else... SO, in that vein and sense it might still qualify.  hmm  'Sides,   I've been quite right about every other month since October...so, meh.  That's a decent grade in anticipating these temperature layouts, nonetheless.   Also, having that impressively deep cold garland lording over top the Canadian Shield while there's a quasar spanning the conterminous U.S., definitely helps explain why we've been getting these wild 40 to as much as 50+ F air mass whiplashes, too.

Anyway, here is the tabulation and mean for March provided by https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/

image.thumb.png.e5d251b070e561664a16de8998f560b8.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Welp ... I was wrong about March when it comes to predicting the product result, below.  I had presumed recently that we'd result a more obvious local geographic ( 'local' relative to the whole world) cool zone/island anomaly relative to the whole "inferno" that is clearly and coherently, unarguably the product's character below... eh hm.  Said island had been a persistent leitmotif since late last autumn... 

Still, you know, it really didn't sensibly come off that way?  I recall seeing March colder than the whole country - in fairness I think what is actually going on is that this product below is the "anomaly".  What we experience was a warm anomaly, but just not as demonstrative or obviously so as everywhere else... SO, in that vein and sense it might still qualify.  hmm  'Sides,   I've been quite right about every other month since October...so, meh.  That's a decent grade in anticipating these temperature layouts, nonetheless.   Also, having that impressively deep cold garland lording over top the Canadian Shield while there's a quasar spanning the conterminous U.S., definitely helps explain why we've been getting these wild 40 to as much as 50+ F air mass whiplashes, too.

Anyway, here is the tabulation and mean for March provided by https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/maps/

image.thumb.png.e5d251b070e561664a16de8998f560b8.png

Versus 1951 to 2020 who picked these random years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HoarfrostHubb said:

GFS maybe?  a few showers around on that

 

Still looks like we're largely under the influence of high pressure on Sunday though...looks pretty dry. We increase mid-level moisture/clouds through the day. Perhaps some showers late in the day or moreso overnight but I hear soggy and I think rain most of the day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Not a bad day today. At least it will be nice going into Hartford to see the shitty Wolf Pack play. Only reason I was going to go tonight was see Hagens play. Now I'm going to be stuck watching the awful Wolf Pack. 

Today may challenge the diurnal recovery record in the unofficial nerdy Asperger contest... 

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Today may challenge the diurnal recovery record in the unofficial nerdy Asperger contest... 

 

These days I think are extremely underrated from a scientific aspect. There is something about watching the temps just absolutely sky rocket once mixing gets cranking. It's even more fun when you're in the sun because you can feel the science doing its thing. Love it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Versus 1951 to 2020 who picked these random years

was going to try and create a composite comparing March to 1971-2000, 1981-2010, and 1991-2020 climo but March 2026 not available yet on the reanalysis page. Also just found out that NCEP/NCAR R1 is being discontinued

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

was going to try and create a composite comparing March to 1971-2000, 1981-2010, and 1991-2020 climo but March 2026 not available yet on the reanalysis page. Also just found out that NCEP/NCAR R1 is being discontinued

Yeah, that was announced awhile ago, but it looks like a new solution is being offered.  Unsure if that is the entire motive/reason for making the move, but they announced this a month or so ago

"...Central Operations has announced that the Climate Data Assimilation System (CDAS) will be discontinued in favor of the Conventional Observation Reanalysis (CORe) ..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said:

 

amaps (1).png

what site can you pull that from? Are you able to choose our own climatology periods or does it provide a list?

I've used this

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/atmoswrit/map/

You can create your own climatology period by subtracting from dataset two and using the years to subtract. I really like this because say I wanted to look at 1974...it's nice to see how 1974 compared to the 1941-1970 climo instead of just to the current climo (and even better because you can do both and see where the greatest changes have occurred)

image.png.e1774702ba12d4ded990c1be0dc0ceaa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah, that was announced awhile ago, but it looks like a new solution is being offered.  Unsure if that is the entire motive/reason for making the move, but they announced this a month or so ago

"...Central Operations has announced that the Climate Data Assimilation System (CDAS) will be discontinued in favor of the Conventional Observation Reanalysis (CORe) ..."

Wow, I totally missed that. I'll have to read some more into it. I wonder if this CORe is just a more improved dataset?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Wow, I totally missed that. I'll have to read some more into it. I wonder if this CORe is just a more improved dataset?

I haven't looked into it.  

I don't really do a lot reanalysis -related look ups.  

I've been posting the GIS sfc temperature anomaly product from NASA on or around the 10th for the past several months, just for the muse of the fact that we enjoyed what most perceive ...even if not objectively so, a cold snowy winter, yet that was the exception to the vaster rule.  

It's been an interesting observational journey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weatherwiz said:

Thanks!! I feel like I had this site bookmarked at one point but probably lost it when something happened with my bookmarks. Curious if they will roll over to ERSSTv6 at some point

Dude, I put that same link      in my post!

people just glance over these posts...  miss stuff.  But definitely knee jerk react.  

I tell ya, social media engagement is a privilege that about 96% of the population may not be very well suited for

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I haven't looked into it.  

I don't really do a lot reanalysis -related look ups.  

I've been posting the GIS sfc temperature anomaly product from NASA on or around the 10th for the past several months, just for the muse of the fact that we enjoyed what most perceive ...even if not objectively so, a cold snowy winter, yet that was the exception to the vaster rule.  

It's been an interesting observational journey. 

I remember reading your post with your thoughts on the March map. I would have shared your thoughts...but pretty interesting to see.

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

Dude, I put that same link      in my post!

whoops, I read past it :lol: I saw it just after Steve posted the link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Thanks!! I feel like I had this site bookmarked at one point but probably lost it when something happened with my bookmarks. Curious if they will roll over to ERSSTv6 at some point

Notice when you combine land and sea anomalies and use a 1995 to 2025 climo base Tips anomaly for March drops from .9 to .04. Data use is important but data can be sometimes not used correctly 

amaps (2).png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Notice when you combine land and sea anomalies and use a 1995 to 2025 climo base Tips anomaly for March drops from .9 to .04. Data use is important but data can be sometimes not used correctly 

amaps (2).png

I did not use it incorrectly.

Those are the straight up global anomalies, using an expanded data set because in scientific principle, denser sample sizes are better - when also stretched out over the longer term, exposes trends that have more confidence.

UNLIKE what you are providing in your poorly thought out rebuke, using scanter sizes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...