Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,985
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    Damisa
    Newest Member
    Damisa
    Joined

2026-2027 Super El Nino


Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, GaWx said:

More on the not mild 1877-8 in much of the E US:

NYC using 1869-1900 for normals

Dec 37.4 (+3.2) AN

Jan 29.9 (-0.4) NN

Feb 32.3 (+1.2) NN

So, DJF +1.3 NN with only Dec warmer than normal and even it wasn’t a torch

https://www.weather.gov/wrh/Climate?wfo=okx

@csnavywx

Parts of the East had their lowest snowfall of the 1800s that winter.

The big story during the 1877-1878 super El Niño was the warmth in the Upper Midwest.

It’s an example how  really strong El Niños can sometimes have their warmest departures in February. 

While we don’t have the 1841-1870 climate normals for MSP, I used the earliest available 30 year period.

The departures for them that winter would have been like if December 2015 had run through February 2016 in the Northeast with no pattern reversal.


MSP 1877-1878 

DEC….+14.5

JAN…..+9.8

FEB……+15.8


 

Monthly Mean Avg Temperature for Minneapolis-St Paul Area, MN (ThreadEx)
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Mean 19.3 12.0 15.7 15.6
Max 33.8
1877
25.9
1880
31.9
1877
1872-1873 6.0 5.4 12.8 8.1
1873-1874 17.6 12.2 12.6 14.1
1874-1875 17.2 -3.4 -2.6 3.7
1875-1876 24.7 15.7 15.9 18.8
1876-1877 8.3 8.6 31.9 16.3
1877-1878 33.8 21.8 31.5 29.0
1878-1879 19.1 16.1 12.7 16.0
1879-1880 11.5 25.9 19.6 19.0
1880-1881 13.2 7.9 17.1 12.7
1881-1882 29.0 19.0 30.4 26.1
1882-1883 15.0 0.8 12.1 9.3
1883-1884 19.7 8.8 12.9 13.8
1884-1885 14.8 4.4 11.3 10.2
1885-1886 21.0 3.7 14.9 13.2
1886-1887 7.3 0.7 9.4 5.8
1887-1888 17.4 -0.4 13.1 10.0
1888-1889 25.2 20.7 10.6 18.8
1889-1890 28.8 10.6 19.2 19.5
1890-1891 24.4 21.6 11.8 19.3
1891-1892 30.1 13.5 22.9 22.2
1892-1893 16.8 7.3 12.0 12.0
1893-1894 14.0 12.3 15.7 14.0
1894-1895 28.1 7.0 12.0 15.7
1895-1896 22.5 16.8 22.3 20.5
1896-1897 24.4 10.6 20.0 18.3
1897-1898 15.3 23.0 20.6 19.6
1898-1899 14.1 13.7 7.8 11.9
1899-1900 21.4 21.3 8.6 17.1
1900-1901 21.0 15.2 12.3 16.2
1901-1902 15.9 18.7 18.2 17.6

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, snowman19 said:

@Mitchnick Which models are you looking at that always show the trade winds coming back? Because you’ve been saying that for quite awhile now and all we’ve seen are record breaking WWBs, westerlies and a complete trade wind reversal

5f6788368d71b7c4e6fb91fcf3727d75.jpg
5f93c0894fe4746221f8f687a3010ea7.jpg
9a15e7136d600f1edc481ee636c6cf22.jpg

That's what the Cfs2 was showing over 3 months ago when I posted. I was just the messenger. Obviously, Cfs2 forecast, updated multiple times a day, changed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just looking at that stuff... 

According to CPC most recent power point,

image.png.7498b01a5319b5e241b8b8dbbd55042a.png

yet the present NINO 3.4. regional anomalies ( found here:   https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/?dm_id=nino3.4 ) are already floating around +2.00 C.   So, either their CFSv2 product is less accurate as a predictive use ( by over a whole deg C ), or... Climate Reanalyzer's data is suss. 

I don't really care to get into that ..per se, I'm really just more interested in general with the comparison between monitoring vs modeling: where are we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I was just looking at that stuff... 

According to CPC most recent power point,

image.png.7498b01a5319b5e241b8b8dbbd55042a.png

yet the present NINO 3.4. regional anomalies ( found here:   https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/?dm_id=nino3.4 ) are already floating around +2.00 C.   So, either their CFSv2 product is less accurate as a predictive use ( by over a whole deg C ), or... Climate Reanalyzer's data is suss. 

I don't really care to get into that ..per se, I'm really just more interested in general with the comparison between monitoring vs modeling: where are we?

Daily Cfs2 plume charts are updated daily and hyperlinked to this site; past half way down.

https://www.stormsurf.com/page2/links/ensocurr.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Parts of the East had their lowest snowfall of the 1800s that winter.

The big story during the 1877-1878 super El Niño was the warmth in the Upper Midwest.

It’s an example how  really strong El Niños can sometimes have their warmest departures in February. 

While we don’t have the 1841-1870 climate normals for MSP, I used the earliest available 30 year period.

The departures for them that winter would have been like if December 2015 had run through February 2016 in the Northeast with no pattern reversal.


MSP 1877-1878 

DEC….+14.5

JAN…..+9.8

FEB……+15.8


 

Monthly Mean Avg Temperature for Minneapolis-St Paul Area, MN (ThreadEx)
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Mean 19.3 12.0 15.7 15.6
Max 33.8
1877
25.9
1880
31.9
1877
1872-1873 6.0 5.4 12.8 8.1
1873-1874 17.6 12.2 12.6 14.1
1874-1875 17.2 -3.4 -2.6 3.7
1875-1876 24.7 15.7 15.9 18.8
1876-1877 8.3 8.6 31.9 16.3
1877-1878 33.8 21.8 31.5 29.0
1878-1879 19.1 16.1 12.7 16.0
1879-1880 11.5 25.9 19.6 19.0
1880-1881 13.2 7.9 17.1 12.7
1881-1882 29.0 19.0 30.4 26.1
1882-1883 15.0 0.8 12.1 9.3
1883-1884 19.7 8.8 12.9 13.8
1884-1885 14.8 4.4 11.3 10.2
1885-1886 21.0 3.7 14.9 13.2
1886-1887 7.3 0.7 9.4 5.8
1887-1888 17.4 -0.4 13.1 10.0
1888-1889 25.2 20.7 10.6 18.8
1889-1890 28.8 10.6 19.2 19.5
1890-1891 24.4 21.6 11.8 19.3
1891-1892 30.1 13.5 22.9 22.2
1892-1893 16.8 7.3 12.0 12.0
1893-1894 14.0 12.3 15.7 14.0
1894-1895 28.1 7.0 12.0 15.7
1895-1896 22.5 16.8 22.3 20.5
1896-1897 24.4 10.6 20.0 18.3
1897-1898 15.3 23.0 20.6 19.6
1898-1899 14.1 13.7 7.8 11.9
1899-1900 21.4 21.3 8.6 17.1
1900-1901 21.0 15.2 12.3 16.2
1901-1902 15.9 18.7 18.2 17.6

 

 

 


Unlike the very mild Feb 1878 in the upper Midwest, the E US’ warmest month of that winter was the fairly typical El Niño warmest Dec. In contrast, Feb was only modestly AN in a good portion of the NE to NN in the SE. Jan was NN to BN. Jan-Feb combined in much of the E US wasn’t mild at all and instead was largely NN (no more than slightly AN in the NE and even BN in good part of SE).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I was just looking at that stuff... 

According to CPC most recent power point,

image.png.7498b01a5319b5e241b8b8dbbd55042a.png

yet the present NINO 3.4. regional anomalies ( found here:   https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/?dm_id=nino3.4 ) are already floating around +2.00 C.   So, either their CFSv2 product is less accurate as a predictive use ( by over a whole deg C ), or... Climate Reanalyzer's data is suss. 

I don't really care to get into that ..per se, I'm really just more interested in general with the comparison between monitoring vs modeling: where are we?

That CFS graph is referring to relative 3.4 anomalies, which are currently in the +1.3 to +1.5 region rather than ~+2.0. Actually, the official relative 3.4 for last week was only +1.3:

08JUL2026         2.6        1.7        1.3        0.5

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

 The CFS latest 10 day mean prog has a whopping +2.3 for relative 3.4 in August! August will be a really big test to see if the progged record breaking Nino is still on track as that would require a near 1C rise from July! Going back to the start of records in 1950, there has never been a 1C+ rise within just one month. I‘m talking about any month in any ENSO. Will it actually warm that much in August??

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt

IMG_1276.thumb.png.9d11f70d85ac65b63c6278ce7de350e8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GaWx said:
That CFS graph is referring to relative 3.4 anomalies, which are currently in the +1.3 to +1.5 region rather than ~+2.0. Actually, the official relative 3.4 for last week was only +1.3:
08JUL2026         2.6        1.7        1.3        0.5
https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_wksst9120.txt
 The CFS latest 10 day mean prog has a whopping +2.3 for relative 3.4 in August! August will be a really big test to see if the progged record breaking Nino is still on track as that would require a near 1C rise from July:
IMG_1276.thumb.png.9d11f70d85ac65b63c6278ce7de350e8.png

Absolutely believable based on the massive WWB about to start, which I just posted about above from Paul Roundy, the subsurface warmth and the new DWKW making its way east

@Gawx Edit: The new OHC is up to +2.5C and climbing

97903702063510c934a30941a35ad4cf.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

Absolutely believable based on the massive WWB about to start, which I just posted about above from Paul Roundy, the subsurface warmth and the new DWKW making its way east

 Believable but will it actually happen? Nobody knows. Largest month to month warming on record is 0.85 (Jan ‘56). The largest warming on record in Aug is 0.61 (1988). Actually, the largest on record of any month July-Oct is only that 0.61.
 Here are the largest on record:

 

0.85 Jan 1956

0.84 June 1968

0.78 Mar 1951

0.73 Feb 1976

0.71 May 2026

0.68 Nov 2009

0.68 Mar 2000

0.66 May 1967

0.61 Aug 1988

0.61 Jan 1975

0.60 Oct 1991

0.60 Jan 1953


https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/Rnino34.ascii.txt

@Typhoon Tip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GaWx said:

This map agrees with many of the official SE station temps being NN (and even BN in FL as Jacksonville and other official temps confirm). It also shows that the torch was centered in the Midwest and Plains with no torch near the E coast (ex: NYC was ~+1.3F, not a torch). Much of NE coast was only 1-2 F AN per the city by city official temps.

Yes, at first blush it's not a disaster for the SE. But last couple of strong Ninos makes it clear it may not be that cut and dry either. Either way, I'd bet on wet.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The large kelvin wave around 140W is probably the one to do most of the heavy lifting in a few weeks. Would expect subsurface anoms to increase past +10C here soon. Getting a little more tricky to find them when they get generated since the thermocline is pretty depressed already, but at least this one is still pretty visible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GaWx said:


Unlike the very mild Feb 1878 in the upper Midwest, the E US’ warmest month of that winter was the fairly typical El Niño warmest Dec. In contrast, Feb was only modestly AN in a good portion of the NE to NN in the SE. Jan was NN to BN. Jan-Feb combined in much of the E US wasn’t mild at all and instead was largely NN (no more than slightly AN in the NE and even BN in good part of SE).

1997 -1998 would be a case of the warmest departures for NYC occurring in January and February. The actual February average temperature was the warmest monthly temperature of the winter.

Dec…38.2°….+2.0

Jan…40.0°…..+8.6°

Feb…..40.6°….+7.0°


2023-2024 had the warmest departure in December and the 2nd warmest in February.

Dec…44.6°…..+5.5°

Jan….37.0°……+3.3°

Feb….40.1°……+4.2°
 

2015-2016 was the most extreme front-loaded super El Niño for warmth with +13.3 in December. 

Dec….50.8°…..+13.3°

Jan…..34.5°….+1.9°

Feb…..37.7°……+2.4°

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bluewave said:

1997 -1998 would be a case of the warmest departures for NYC occurring in January and February. The actual February average temperature was the warmest monthly temperature of the winter.

Dec…38.2°….+2.0

Jan…40.0°…..+8.6°

Feb…..40.6°….+7.0°


2023-2024 had the warmest departure in December and the 2nd warmest in February.

Dec…44.6°…..+5.5°

Jan….37.0°……+3.3°

Feb….40.1°……+4.2°
 

2015-2016 was the most extreme front-loaded super El Niño for warmth with +13.3 in December. 

Dec….50.8°…..+13.3°

Jan…..34.5°….+1.9°

Feb…..37.7°……+2.4°

Bigger picture for 1982-83. Interesting how Jan/Feb had nearly identical anomaly patterns.

cd98_55_76_146_196_11_40_47_prcp.png.fc236b43b2da98bec35a44ccafcd0012.png

cd98_55_76_146_196_11_41_15_prcp.png.14a015cfcc32ab0cf72ac2701b815038.png

cd98_55_76_146_196_11_41_43_prcp.png.62701d6dadbbe065b448c1cd6ba448a4.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest daily OISST anomaly update for 3.4 had a warming of a whopping 0.13C, which is the largest rise since June 4th. This is the kind of move that will probably be needed from time to time to get August averaged out up to the mid +2s:

IMG_1280.thumb.png.2359e37408c77e5669ba06de95cfd613.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...