Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,019
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

2026-2027 Record-breaking El Nino


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, GaWx said:

 Comparison of Sept ‘23 Euro for DJF 23-4 and Sept ‘26 for DJF 26-7: ~twice the contrast N to S ‘26-7 vs ‘23-4 in E US 

’23:
IMG_2375.png.19885b0b6a52c817e6b4ad43c2cc8293.png

 

‘26:

IMG_2374.png.be58e53f6fc9d3510ce31c5d4255c7fd.png

what does this have to do with el nino

  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

H5 comparisons Euro Sep fcasts for JFM ‘27 vs ‘24: larger contrasts worldwide/E US!

‘24: very little >40m (<5% of the globe) and no <-40m
IMG_2377.png.4ecb6c850a7f4bc4d1db158f2b819bc8.png
 

 

‘27: much more >40m (~1/2 the globe) and sig. more <-40m (3 areas vs none in ‘24)
IMG_2376.png.1c987132327b72bf42e0ef5a9e7ee60a.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GaWx said:

H5 comparisons Euro Sep fcasts for JFM ‘27 vs ‘24: larger contrasts worldwide/E US!

‘24: very little >40m (<5% of the globe) and no <40m
IMG_2377.png.4ecb6c850a7f4bc4d1db158f2b819bc8.png
 

 

‘27: much more >40m (~1/2 the globe) and sig. more <40m (3 areas vs none in ‘24)
IMG_2376.png.1c987132327b72bf42e0ef5a9e7ee60a.png

It’s basically just leaning into a stronger signal for a canonical Nino pattern because the Nino itself is progged to be much stronger than 23-24. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, LakePaste25 said:

It’s basically just leaning into a stronger signal for a canonical Nino pattern because the Nino itself is progged to be much stronger than 23-24. 

I’ll add that the globe is warmer over last 3 years helping to add to the huge increase in >+40m anomalies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm not concerned about that at all. We'll need it the year, IMHO....will be the difference between infrastructure-paralyzing paste and wind-swept sheets of rain.

That is absurd for February....like 2010, stuff.

Boinnnnnng!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mitchnick said:

Boinnnnnng!!!

 

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Problem is I don't buy it given the magnitude and orientation of El Niño along with the QBO and solar cycle...it was kind of doing the same thing in Sept. 2023.

 

AVvXsEharQMZuwNPx-pZj7umJc4g_8tWNmLZ8qEZ

 

 

Feb 2024 ended up with a +1.09 NAO.... +.76 DJFM mean NAO, so it whiffed on that.

 

Shrivel!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I will say is that with somewhat less MC influence, perhaps it may be a it easier to pop a -NAO during the coming season, but still a lot working against it in the grand scheme of things....solar cycle is about as hostile as it gets with geomagnetic energy peaking a couple of years removed from solar max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Problem is I don't buy it given the magnitude and orientation of El Niño along with the QBO and solar cycle...it was kind of doing the same thing in Sept. 2023.

 

AVvXsEharQMZuwNPx-pZj7umJc4g_8tWNmLZ8qEZ

 

 

Feb 2024 ended up with a +1.09 NAO.... +.76 DJFM mean NAO, so it whiffed on that.

 

The Euro's 23/24 winter forecast just stunk. As I  previously posted, the Cfs2 was already showing a warm winter by mid September. This year, the difference between the 2 right now is not that great and they are similar to the Cansips, Jamstec, and NMME. So it's going to be a massive failure by all modeling or a consensus success. The only caveat being there's still time for modeling to change to something better or worse depending on one's perspective .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

 

 

Sept 2026:
 
AVvXsEgZfVMthFRETyop69UlZRF9P_oLj0qw54QY

Sept 2023:

AVvXsEharQMZuwNPx-pZj7umJc4g_8tWNmLZ8qEZ

Here are the relevant SLP maps for JFM NAO:

JFM ’24: strong -NAO

IMG_2380.png.d76397ca7879d5091aa6e238ac4569fb.png

JFM ‘27: even stronger -NAO, which jibes with your comparison of JFM ‘24 to JFM ‘27.
IMG_2379.png.fd04cf60ea24f2334016300b422aa96e.png

 

 However, note that there are stronger SLP contrasts worldwide in ‘27 vs ‘24 and not just in the NAO region. Note that in ‘24, only ~1% has +2+ mb vs ~~10% in ‘27. Similarly, the % with -2- mb is sig. higher in ‘27 vs ‘24. Not sure what to make of that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GaWx said:

Here are the relevant SLP maps for JFM NAO:

JFM ’24: strong -NAO

IMG_2380.png.d76397ca7879d5091aa6e238ac4569fb.png

JFM ‘27: even stronger -NAO, which jibes with your comparison of JFM ‘24 to JFM ‘27.
IMG_2379.png.fd04cf60ea24f2334016300b422aa96e.png

 

 However, note that there are stronger SLP contrasts worldwide in ‘27 vs ‘24 and not just in the NAO region. Note that in ‘24, only ~1% has +2+ mb vs ~~10% in ‘27. Similarly, the % with -2- mb is sig. higher in ‘27 vs ‘24.

It kinds of seems like the same forecast from 2023, just amplified, which doesn't engender a ton of confidence from me.

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
  • sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

^ Should get some 500mb effect in the N. Pacific if that forecast verifies for early Oct

Although this 12Z 9/5/26 CFSv2 ens. AAM fcast is THE highest I’ve seen for the entire 35 day period, I realize that it has a + bias, especially the further out in the forecast period. I still haven’t seen anything forecasted at 4+ to verify even closely and even many of the 3+ forecast days have been overdone.
 

 This has 4+ for all 4 members by day 11 (Sept 15th), which along with the 0Z 9/5/26 forecast is at the earliest I’ve ever seen that high. It has 3+ starting on Sep. 8th. But as I alluded to, many runs had 3+ for all of mid to late Aug and all of Sept and few, if any, days actually hit 3+ since mid Aug. It even dipped briefly to just below +2 in late Aug! 

 In this case, I expect it will reach 3+ within a few days based on how steep it has it rising now. But regarding it hitting 4+ Sep. 15th or even after, I’ll believe it when I see it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2026 at 4:11 PM, mitchnick said:

If you're referring to the Eps, I agree. Except you can see a dip in the height lines in the GOA not too far from the one on the Geps. Suggesting maybe it might be showing some blue in the GOA in future runs....OK, look real hard then! Lol

eps_z500a_namer_61.png

When you get older Chuck, you'll start to appreciate the near-dementia wisdom of age. Lol

eps_z500a_namer_61 (1).png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...