Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    19,032
    Total Members
    49,013
    Most Online
    loganboehmewx
    Newest Member
    loganboehmewx
    Joined

2026-2027 Record-breaking El Nino


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mitchnick said:

I wonder if the Cfs2 winter 23/24 temp forecast from 9/11/23 was discounted? I guarantee you it was...but it would have been by me! Lol

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/CFSv2/cfsv2_fcst_history/202309/htmls/usT2me3Mon.html

They're not always climo come September. Cfs2 was actually on the right path come early September, 2023. 

People were saying canadian would change by September. Well. Its held steady. Not saying its right, but it has not caved to a mild winter. 

  • yes 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The summer 500 mb pattern was as opposite as you can get from a developing super El Niño in the Northern Hemisphere. The 500mb ridges dominated where the troughs were supposed to be. 

But the Southern Hemisphere response during their winter may give us some clues what to expect here.

Notice how the 500mb ridges were stronger than the expected troughs. It was obvious near New Zealand and South America.

This would translate into a weaker Aleutian Low and weaker low pressure near the Southeast U.S and or Western Atlantic than is usual for such a strong El Niño.

Could mean a warmer more dominant ridge pattern over North America than is typically the case for a super El Niño event. 

Should this occur during our winter, then it would follow the general pattern regardless of ENSO of the 500mb ridges being more impressive than the troughs since the 2015-2016 super El Niño.

 

https://www.pyreweather.org/map/?variable=height&level=500&region=World&mode=anomaly&months=202606%2C202607%2C202608&fill_mode=shaded&climo_source=r2-monthly

IMG_7500.thumb.png.60bfb7993449d187b724c7e38f0f9dad.png

 

IMG_7501.png.c0fce7ceb5fe7c07cc0c45ec17bb5773.png

IMG_7499.png.80a50bcde960458d71bc032c3f8780af.png

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MJO812 said:

Or maybe its right . The next two runs will be key .

Sure, but we have good reasons to believe that it isn't. I could still doubt that you're one of NYC's finest after you show me your badge and a pic of you sleeping in the cruiser, but that doesn't change the facts.

No runs are key if the model incessantly suffers from an erroneous initialization. Again, this doesn't necessarily mean an awful winter is en route, it just means that CANSIPS output is highly flawed. Maybe we will make out okay and score a HECS...both can be true, and in fact, I suspect that they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

So it's going to be too low with heights in the southeast, but nail the northeast and mid atlantic?

Good luck-

Well, by the shadings, it hasn't in the past been nailing any areas. But has been doing better in some areas over others. For example, last year it did well in parts of the MW, NE, and MA while missing out west. Plus, the bottom map is an average over the last 30 years from what I'm seeing; probably the top one too. I wonder how accuracy would change if only looking back the last 5 years when there are obviously improvements with modeling.

I don't know about you, but there is an obvious concerted effort by the CC monetaryists, if I may call them that, to poo-poo any seasonal forecast that isn't a wall-to-wall Conus toaster oven. And I  would put Jonathan Wall into that category based on the 100+ posts he's made that have shown up on this Board.

Nobody knows with certainty how this winter will play out other than odds definitely favor AN in many areas of the Conus. But efforts to contradict/attack seasonal modeling are always a red flag to me.

  • Like 1
  • omg 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OHC monthly rose to a new record high that last month had set (note these aren’t adjusted for GW in a “relative” sense, but they’re still very impressive):


2025   11    -0.02     -0.33      -0.46
2025   12     0.26      0.01      -0.03
2026    1     0.64      0.45       0.49
2026    2     1.08      1.02       1.15
2026    3     1.38      1.39       1.36
2026    4     1.85      2.07       2.24
2026    5     1.67      1.97       1.99
2026    6     1.79      2.14       2.26
2026    7     2.03      2.50       2.96
2026    8     2.19      2.75       3.20

 The following image is for the same longitudes as that for the 3rd column and it jibes fairly well:

IMG_2324.thumb.gif.1c490dbadd37b2617e8cf8793f8d059c.gif

Prior to 2026, this had been the record high for the last 2 columns:


1997   10     1.35      2.05       2.56

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The new relative OISST (not ERSST) has just been released and the change from July jibes well for Nino 3.4 with the slope of the graphs we’ve been following (though as I’ve also been saying the weeklies/last 2 months are notably cooler than what the cyclonicwx graphs have been suggesting).

2026    7      2.84     1.73     0.34      1.38
2026    8      3.35     2.52     0.11      1.78

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/rel_mthsst9120.txt
 
  This 1.78 is a new record high (back to 1981) for August Nino 3.4 as it barely beats the 1.74 of 1997. Here are the warmest Augusts since 1981:

2026 1.78
1997 1.74
2015 1.30
1987 1.24
1982 1.19
1991 0.82
2002 0.80
1994 0.72
2004 0.71
2023 0.63

 Note that Nino 3 rose twice as much and Nino 4 fell 0.23! Also, Nino 1+2 rose the 2nd most at 0.51. All of this indicates that this Nino has been becoming increasingly E based and that the W portion of Nino 3.4 is what is holding it back vs what model projections had been.

 Also, note that Nino 3.4 rose only 0.4C from the July avg to the Aug avg. I say “only” because several models were suggesting (as I’ve posted about several times) a record rapid rise for 3.4 of ~1C. It remains to be seen what the rise was per ERSST, but it’s clear that August didn’t warm nearly as much in 3.4 as model consensus had suggested, which has caused some at least near-term cooling of progs in some models’ recent runs.

 Here’s the latest OISST relative 3.4 chart through Sept 1st: STILL no sign of resumption of warming with it practically flat the last 31 days!

IMG_2326.thumb.png.f85464d11b27fc1b2dd4dca870c20d73.png
 

The CDAS (not relative) agrees with the continuing flatness:

IMG_2327.png.377d860b2eab5a595d30a0534c981238.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the above, here are Nino 3 and Nino 4 (note that these aren’t relative, but that’s ok since my point is to show the slopes):

Nino 3: still a slow rise through Aug instead of nearly flat like 3.4:

IMG_2328.thumb.png.bc97c202d6d38f6e2f0148627c482f3f.png

Nino 4: had been falling through Aug 17th though a bumpy net slow rise since:

IMG_2329.thumb.png.650002f21363ce39630fcb10a426fd57.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...