Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,658
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    otree38
    Newest Member
    otree38
    Joined

January 2026 Short/Medium Range Thread


John1122
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hoping a northern stream vort makes it far enough south and then blows up in the perfect spot to grab Atlantic moisture and throw it all the way back into the southern apps seems like much less than a 10% chance……. lol

If that southern vort perks up would that help? With the northern piece trending north maybe that can be our saving grace if we are lucky lol. It speeding up couldn’t hurt either I would think


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS from 1/23 is probably the high end of what could happen at this point with some ticks west:
Please note before you look below, this is from 0z GFS 1/23, not a more recent run
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
hTpzWim.gif
 
 
v9kiGfO.gif
 
 

So it is possible for it to dive further west and south.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may have to break down and look at Google AI.  

FTR, it is freaking cold outside.  Roads here this morning were a solid sheet of ice w/ about a 1/2" of new snow overnight.  You could barely stand up on some streets - yes, I went running in this mess(if you can call it running when on ice).  

Snow flurries are rolling through currently.  We put covers on outdoors spigots yesterday evening.  I think this type of light snow shower activity may continue on and off throughout the cold snap....14-15' type of stuff but lighter.

  • Like 3
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The setup reminds me of a couple of classic central and eastern Carolina snowstorms in the past.  Maybe east TN can back into a decent snow?  I'd say this one has high whiff potential, but the high end of what could happen is a high ratio super cold snow (which we rarely have any chance of seeing outside of northwest flow)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this one doesn't trend NW, but not too far, it will truly be another epic failure. I saw a discussion about the NW trend being because models mistake something from range, I think it was something to do with sea temperatures maybe, that causes them to almost universally place systems too far SE. Which is why we see the NW trend constantlly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, John1122 said:

If this one doesn't trend NW, but not too far, it will truly be another epic failure. I saw a discussion about the NW trend being because models mistake something from range, I think it was something to do with sea temperatures maybe, that causes them to almost universally place systems too far SE. Which is why we see the NW trend constantlly.

I've tried to figure that problem out for years...personally, I think it has to doe with the grids and physics engines for the upper air pattern. The closer you get alot of times the 500 pattern slowly ticks west..like the physics engine is too fast advancing leads to the old saying "models keep kicking the can down the road" in the LR. When they got rid of truncation and went physics based, they had to figure out a way to not consume enormous amounts of energy to run the system...so as the models advance in time, they generalize and remove some of the physics equation involved which leads models being to quick in upper air pattern. Just theory been working on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...