• Member Statistics

    16,020
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    StormfanaticInd
    Newest Member
    StormfanaticInd
    Joined
mappy

COVID-19 Talk

Recommended Posts

Literally the guy who wrote the study being cited here (Alasdair Munro) like "No, you're reading this study wrong" and other studies, published in the Lancet, have found the opposite.

This in part stems from the fact that most studies have taken place after schools were closed, and Children are not going to be primary transfer points of disease in those cases.

 

He's even raging about it on Twitter right now lol. Retweeting from people saying that hid study shows schools should remain closed. Munro just retweeted this:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there or has there not been a case traced back to a child under 10 passing this to an adult? That's the headline I read..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Yeoman said:

Has there or has there not been a case traced back to a child under 10 passing this to an adult? That's the headline I read..

That headline is exactly what he's raging about. There have been plenty of cases of kids under 10 passing to adults. In the study, they looked at a hundred or so households and none of them had the index case be a kid under 10 years old. He specifically states that the reason for this may be because children are less likely to be symptomatic and thus less likely to be discovered as the index case.

 

You can read more from one of his colleagues here:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Yeoman said:

He cited a legitimate study.. what's your problem? It doesn't fit your agenda of doom and fear?

Yes and there are other studies that contradict. When we have contradictory evidence what that means is “we don’t know yet and we need to further examine it” not go with the study that fits what I want to be true. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I deleted a post because it could have been misconstrued as critical of @Hank Scorpio ‘s post. It wasn’t. It would be awesome if kids have a built in immunity of some sort. My deleted post was because of the ridiculous responses by someone else and I don’t want to engage in it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case you need direct evidence kids can transmit, about 10% of households had a kid as the primary index case by which the virus was transmitted:

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.26.20044826v1

 

(This study is included in the Munro study, who has specifically said the conclusion in the media was being reported erroneously)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Munro notes that there is a paucity of studies on children passing to adults though, for a ton of reasons. Most schools closed relatively early before studies began collecting data, and before widespread testing, so you wouldn't expecct many index cases to be children. Parents are much more likely to continue to be working and entering the community right now. Testing is hard to obtain period right now in many countries. You can't run an experimental study for obvious ethical reasons. Studies looking at viral load and infectivity suggest kids are just as infectious as adults.

 

But on top of all of this, there are tons of studies out there reporting different things in terms of childhood infectivity and so we should listen to the public health officials to draw our conclusions on this, instead of focusing on a single study that confirms our biases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not really possible to go back to school and distance from others. The hallways are packed, stairs, no way. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Yes and there are other studies that contradict. When we have contradictory evidence what that means is “we don’t know yet and we need to further examine it” not go with the study that fits what I want to be true. 

Right.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AdamHLG said:

So much for that 3 day downward trend of hospitalized patients..  

Yeah... we're on a bit of an uptick. Hopefully it doesn't go higher.

 

But honestly after I saw what I saw on the trails and parks a couple weekends ago, I am not optimistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Rhino16 said:

It is not really possible to go back to school and distance from others. The hallways are packed, stairs, no way. 

There’s no point in going back to school, it’s May

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Baltimorewx said:

There’s no point in going back to school, it’s May

I'm more following daycares. I don't think I'm ready to send my son back, but if they reopen I'll have a hard choice to make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, PrinceFrederickWx said:

MD will be the last state in the country to being reopening- and when we do, it will likely involve mandatory rectal temperature-taking before entering any store. :lol:

Lol funny. Honestly the only 2 things I miss are restaurants/bars and sports. I never aimlessly went into stores to begin with so I could careless about typical retail. But I’m ready to sit at my local tiki bar, and sip on some drinks while watching the Os game. Weather supportive of course 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hogan should spend less time puffing his chest about MARYLAND STRONG and more time fixing the broken unemployment system. My brother waited online for 6 hours to refile, then got an automated form in the mail saying he had to call- and the line has been busy for days, you can never get through. Meanwhile he didn't get paid, his career has been destroyed, and he's running out of money...

The snarky comments on here about "awww Karen can't get her nails done!" -no, it's a lot worse than that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Baltimorewx said:

There’s no point in going back to school, it’s May

Most of the planning I’m aware of is for summer school and fall. Annoyingly some of the suggestions aren’t realistic. Lots of details need to be worked out. Directives with no way to realistically implement them isn’t helpful.  That’s like a high stakes game of “not my problem, I told them what to do and they didn’t do it”. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasn’t been confirmed but it sounds like MLB will resume spring training on June 15 and open the season July 1 with teams playing in their own stadiums.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, nw baltimore wx said:

Hasn’t been confirmed but it sounds like MLB will resume spring training on June 15 and open the season July 1 with teams playing in their own stadiums.

Still a while away but would be acceptable I guess. Question would be with fans? What capacity? Etc etc 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Baltimorewx said:

Still a while away but would be acceptable I guess. Question would be with fans? What capacity? Etc etc 

I’m guessing no fans right now. Well, when they start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have so many questions on sports...

 

What happens when a team gets cases? Does the game get canceled, and the team get isolated for 2 weeks? Seems like a logistical nightmare for scheduling.

What happens to the refs, who seem to be in the at risk age range? 

What happens with the coaches, many of who are in similar age ranges?

And of course... what the hell is going to happen with college football?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, ErinInTheSky said:

A day or two more of this and we're probably not going to be on track for the 14 day phase 1.

Honestly, we’re probably at the bottom in terms of cases, etc.  It will only go up from here as things start to open and people start to leave their houses.  The question is whether we can keep it at a manageable level or whether it will shoot up again.  It’s not realistic to think cases, deaths, etc., will actually decrease while restrictions are lifted.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ErinInTheSky said:

I have so many questions on sports...

 

What happens when a team gets cases? Does the game get canceled, and the team get isolated for 2 weeks? Seems like a logistical nightmare for scheduling.

What happens to the refs, who seem to be in the at risk age range? 

What happens with the coaches, many of who are in similar age ranges?

And of course... what the hell is going to happen with college football?

I don’t have answers but I think a lot depends on the availability of rapid testing.  If players, coaches and umps are getting tested daily, then it can be managed.  If someone tests positive, he gets isolated and the rest of the team can continue as long as they test negative.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jaydreb said:

I don’t have answers but I think a lot depends on the availability of rapid testing.  If players, coaches and umps are getting tested daily, then it can be managed.  If someone tests positive, he gets isolated and the rest of the team can continue as long as they test negative.  

Daily testing for every employee of a sports league that is in contact with each other would be so hard... But I hope that we do have that kind of testing capacity. But then it would bring to mind... There are about 120k NFL employees, for instance. 120k daily tests would be more than any state runs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.