Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,648
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    SENCMike
    Newest Member
    SENCMike
    Joined

Winter Begins Jan 20th AWT


40/70 Benchmark

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OceanStWx said:

I was sleeping when you sent this out, but our morning sounding is verifying like 6,000 feet deep (700 mb is like -1C) and I would say we're probably in the heart of the CAD.

Yeah.. now in retrospect it is... it does atone -  ..I was looking around at obs about 8 ... 8:15 last night and I was thinking how off this BL handling looked.  As soon as "any" low pressure at all even hinted at approaching the south coast we triggered this impressive pulse of ageo mass here.  We are 15 f'um degrees everywhere and that air is flooding downtown Boston within the hour down here.

I love this kind of thing ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
23 hours ago, ORH_wxman said:

That's exactly what will happen in this storm. The very low Arctic dews are going to be advecting south during the event. This is where I think models are the worst. They put too much emphasis on latent heat in that scenario and not enough on advection of dews. 

Word!

Here is the closest I personally recall hedging myself .. .

" Now... out here in reality... this is probably a ice storm and the models RGEM/NAM...etc... probably too liberal with the polar penetration of warmth at llvs anyway, because the standard BL correction should be applied. " ...which other than the ice storm reference... I was in your camp all along, as were others.  This was man correction over machine ftw on this one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, did the pattern really change? And im not being sarcastic, so please dont read that and infer a sarcastic tone. Still no blocking, still getting cutters or NNE jackpot storms. This is the same storm track, it doesnt appear anything has changed. Now we are going into the 4th week of January. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2019 at 7:21 PM, OceanStWx said:

I want to say something snarky, but we do. So does BOX. Since we started probabilistic snow we’ve documented this.

My SOO’s gut check is: is there is any real chance that your forecast is too low? If you say no, then you have a high bias.

OceanStWX, No offense wasnt meant by it (and I believe by reading none was taken).  I have had the opportunity to visit your WFO while studying meteorology at Plymouth State University.  Great facility and great forecasters there.  One of my old coworkers lived in New Ipswich, NH and I lived in Ashby, MA.  We were basically neighbors (1 mile down the road) and we would always go back and forth on how BOX anf GYX both predicted their snow totals.  

I also agree, BOX does tend to over predict at times as well (as I am sure all WFOs tend to do at one point or another).  It was just amusing to see that southern NH tends (especially in my neck of the woods) gets over predicted quite a bit. I do agree with your gut check though, and it is something I tend to do as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...