Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

March 25-26 storm potential


Mitchel Volk

Recommended Posts

Keep in mind that this storm didn't really trend away from a huge storm. In fact, it never consistently showed a huge storm directly affecting us anyway. If this is the final solution, we can't say that any models really blew it. It would just mean that they didn't change to what we wanted

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Intensity changed but track not really...That initial southern low screws it all up because it pushes the baroclinic zone out to sea. Annoying as hell how close we are here. To miss a storm like the 12z EURO OTS would be a waste of mother nature's wrath. Damn. 

I care more personally that this trough will lift out quickly and warm us up late next week. That it could be heralded in by a MECS would obviously be a huge bonus but I'm resigned either way. I just don't want to get brushed while the main action is out to sea. Another cloudy, flurry filled day would just be annoying after the last two suppressed disasters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to happen is initially the surface low has to tuck in closer to the SC/GA coasts. Whenever we have these hook-type systems that is the only way they work out for us. The track where the system escapes to the east at first will give us absolutely nothing.

In order for this to happen we need the ridge axis out west to continue to trend better with a more N-S orientation. This will force the incoming shortwave and jet streak to surge farther south instead of southeast through the MS Valley, similarly to Boxing Day. That storm does not happen if the mid level flow is oriented more NW to SE in the Plains states.

Those are the changes we need to look for in the coming days. It's that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to happen is initially the surface low has to tuck in closer to the SC/GA coasts. Whenever we have these hook-type systems that is the only way they work out for us. The track where the system escapes to the east at first will give us absolutely nothing.

In order for this to happen we need the ridge axis out west to continue to trend better with a more N-S orientation. This will force the incoming shortwave and jet streak to surge farther south instead of southeast through the MS Valley, similarly to Boxing Day. That storm does not happen if the mid level flow is oriented more NW to SE in the Plains states.

Those are the changes we need to look for in the coming days. It's that simple.

Agreed-the southern stream is escaping east too quickly. The phase needs to happen sooner and the storm has to have a sharper northward movement component quicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that this storm didn't really trend away from a huge storm. In fact, it never consistently showed a huge storm directly affecting us anyway. If this is the final solution, we can't say that any models really blew it. It would just mean that they didn't change to what we wanted

Sent from my iPhone

Agree. It was really only one euro run showing a big hit so far. Mostly everything is OTS or scrapping the coast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting back to the Canadian as the high res version has finally updated...

 

It still develops intense convection on the eastern side and NW side of the low.

 

This run was nearly identical to 00z up through 111 hours and it still has the extra vorticy on the southeast of the trough unphased. The main differences happen the panel right after, instead of splitting the energy you have one solid low. BTW, the 850mb low on the GGEM is only about 100-150 miles east of ACY. That's a pretty classic spot for us to get a storm in here, just a hair east of ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to happen is initially the surface low has to tuck in closer to the SC/GA coasts. Whenever we have these hook-type systems that is the only way they work out for us. The track where the system escapes to the east at first will give us absolutely nothing.

In order for this to happen we need the ridge axis out west to continue to trend better with a more N-S orientation. This will force the incoming shortwave and jet streak to surge farther south instead of southeast through the MS Valley, similarly to Boxing Day. That storm does not happen if the mid level flow is oriented more NW to SE in the Plains states.

Those are the changes we need to look for in the coming days. It's that simple.

The easiest way to save yourself angst with each Euro run is to check in when it's over and read items like this.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to happen is initially the surface low has to tuck in closer to the SC/GA coasts. Whenever we have these hook-type systems that is the only way they work out for us. The track where the system escapes to the east at first will give us absolutely nothing.

In order for this to happen we need the ridge axis out west to continue to trend better with a more N-S orientation. This will force the incoming shortwave and jet streak to surge farther south instead of southeast through the MS Valley, similarly to Boxing Day. That storm does not happen if the mid level flow is oriented more NW to SE in the Plains states.

Those are the changes we need to look for in the coming days. It's that simple.

 

I agree the southern stream low running to far east initally. In this setup, we need pay attention to surface low placement as much as at 500mb pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize even tommorow its 4 days out? Where it is currently a 75 mile shift west and were in a powerful blizzard. The 12Z EURO was very encouraging to say the least my friend

With due respect, several Red taggers have explained that it is nowhere that close. Even as per the Euro we would comofortably need a 150-200 mile shift to get into MECS turf and more like 300 miles for a blizzard. Earlier phase, elongated PV, a fuller phase , increased heights on West coast. If all goes well and we get some-most of these then we will be happy campers but 75 miles west= blizzard? sorry but no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What needs to happen is initially the surface low has to tuck in closer to the SC/GA coasts. Whenever we have these hook-type systems that is the only way they work out for us. The track where the system escapes to the east at first will give us absolutely nothing.

In order for this to happen we need the ridge axis out west to continue to trend better with a more N-S orientation. This will force the incoming shortwave and jet streak to surge farther south instead of southeast through the MS Valley, similarly to Boxing Day. That storm does not happen if the mid level flow is oriented more NW to SE in the Plains states.

Those are the changes we need to look for in the coming days. It's that simple.

 

I agree. That's why the 12z yesterday was closer to the coast at our latitude.

 

today

 

 

yesterday

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...