BullCityWx Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 http://www.meteor.ia...am/nam_kclt.dat and accumulating snowfall at KHKY: http://www.meteor.ia...am/nam_khky.dat sounding for CLT: Date: 24 hour Eta valid 12Z MON 28 MAR 11 Station: KCLT Latitude: 35.22 Longitude: -80.93 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEV PRES HGHT TEMP DEWP RH DD WETB DIR SPD THETA THE-V THE-W THE-E W mb m C C % C C deg knt K K K K g/kg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 1000 159 SFC 995 203 1.3 0.6 95 0.8 1.0 352 5 274.9 275.6 274.5 285.8 4.01 2 950 570 0.1 -0.1 99 0.2 -0.0 39 8 277.3 277.9 275.7 288.2 3.98 3 900 1002 -0.8 -0.9 99 0.1 -0.8 74 7 280.7 281.4 277.6 291.8 3.99 4 850 1460 -0.1 -0.1 100 0.0 -0.1 214 3 286.1 286.9 280.8 298.8 4.47 5 800 1946 0.5 0.4 100 0.1 0.5 258 18 291.7 292.6 283.8 306.0 4.94 6 750 2464 -0.6 -0.6 100 0.0 -0.6 253 30 295.9 296.8 285.4 310.3 4.88 7 700 3014 -2.0 -2.2 99 0.1 -2.1 248 45 300.2 301.1 286.8 314.2 4.66 8 650 3602 -4.3 -4.5 98 0.3 -4.4 246 58 304.1 304.9 287.8 317.0 4.20 9 600 4229 -7.0 -7.4 97 0.4 -7.1 246 69 308.1 308.7 288.6 319.5 3.66 10 550 4903 -11.0 -11.2 99 0.2 -11.1 250 74 311.0 311.6 288.9 320.5 2.96 11 500 5629 -15.7 -17.7 85 2.0 -16.3 255 75 313.9 314.3 288.8 320.2 1.91 12 450 6414 -21.7 -26.7 64 5.0 -22.8 262 79 315.9 316.1 288.5 319.2 0.96 13 400 7269 -28.4 -36.3 47 7.9 -29.5 264 87 318.1 318.2 288.6 319.6 0.43 14 350 8211 -35.5 -48.4 26 12.9 -36.4 265 93 320.9 320.9 289.2 321.4 0.14 15 300 9263 -43.9 -55.6 26 11.7 -44.4 265 99 323.5 323.5 289.9 323.7 0.07 16 250 10463 -52.4 -61.1 34 8.8 -52.6 260 98 328.2 328.2 291.3 328.4 0.04 17 200 11889 -55.0 -66.5 23 11.5 -55.2 260 111 345.7 345.7 295.7 345.8 0.02 18 150 13724 -56.2 -70.6 15 14.4 -56.5 262 87 373.2 373.2 301.1 373.3 0.02 19 100 16272 -61.3 -77.0 11 15.7 -61.5 258 64 409.3 409.3 306.5 409.4 0.01 TRP 0 WND 0 Sounding for HKY: Date: 24 hour Eta valid 12Z MON 28 MAR 11 Station: KHKY Latitude: 35.73 Longitude: -81.38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEV PRES HGHT TEMP DEWP RH DD WETB DIR SPD THETA THE-V THE-W THE-E W mb m C C % C C deg knt K K K K g/kg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 1000 163 SFC 977 353 0.9 0.6 98 0.3 0.8 339 3 275.9 276.6 275.1 287.0 4.09 2 950 574 0.6 0.6 99 0.1 0.6 19 5 277.8 278.5 276.3 289.3 4.19 3 900 1007 -0.9 -0.9 100 0.0 -0.9 47 5 280.6 281.3 277.5 291.7 3.98 4 850 1463 -1.3 -1.3 100 0.0 -1.3 334 4 284.8 285.5 279.7 296.4 4.08 5 800 1946 -1.3 -1.4 100 0.1 -1.3 290 14 289.7 290.5 282.3 302.2 4.32 6 750 2460 -2.5 -2.6 100 0.1 -2.5 270 23 293.9 294.6 283.9 306.3 4.22 7 700 3007 -3.9 -4.0 99 0.1 -3.9 255 36 298.2 299.0 285.5 310.4 4.07 8 650 3590 -5.6 -5.7 99 0.2 -5.7 250 51 302.7 303.4 286.9 314.4 3.83 9 600 4215 -8.0 -8.2 98 0.2 -8.1 251 65 306.9 307.5 287.9 317.6 3.43 10 550 4887 -11.8 -12.1 97 0.3 -11.9 251 73 310.1 310.6 288.4 318.9 2.75 11 500 5611 -16.4 -18.1 87 1.7 -16.9 252 76 313.1 313.4 288.5 319.1 1.85 12 450 6394 -22.3 -27.1 65 4.8 -23.3 256 80 315.2 315.4 288.2 318.4 0.92 13 400 7246 -29.0 -35.9 52 6.9 -29.9 258 87 317.3 317.4 288.3 318.9 0.45 14 350 8187 -36.1 -47.5 30 11.4 -36.9 261 94 320.0 320.1 288.9 320.6 0.15 15 300 9237 -44.4 -55.6 28 11.2 -44.9 263 102 322.8 322.8 289.7 323.0 0.07 16 250 10436 -52.3 -61.3 33 8.9 -52.5 260 101 328.3 328.3 291.3 328.4 0.04 17 200 11860 -55.3 -66.4 24 11.1 -55.5 260 108 345.1 345.1 295.6 345.2 0.03 18 150 13698 -55.4 -70.8 13 15.4 -55.7 262 85 374.6 374.6 301.4 374.7 0.02 19 100 16254 -60.6 -77.3 9 16.6 -60.9 258 61 410.6 410.6 306.6 410.6 0.01 TRP 0 WND 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullCityWx Posted March 27, 2011 Author Share Posted March 27, 2011 3.7" at GSO: http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/bufkit/data/cobb_nam/nam_kgso.dat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx4life Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 This would be quite surprising and amusing if it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullCityWx Posted March 27, 2011 Author Share Posted March 27, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isopycnic Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Now THIS would be as much of a surprise as UNC going all the way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastonwxman Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 At this time of year, it would be hard for me to believe it but certainly not impossible to get snow, let alone accumulation, since it has done so in April before and therefore I say we have potential to get that much if it all comes together. Very interesting of the data you've provided. We'll see what the outcome is but just wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avianman Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I just checked the ground temp here in northern Catawba County (north east of Hickory) and it's 49°. It would have to snow pretty hard to accumulate on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calculus1 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Bring it on! Even if it doesn't stick, it would be cool to see it falling one last time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 The WRF simulated is a sight for NC...has solid heavy snow from the mountains at 12z around AVL to near Forest City Hickory Lincolnton just above Charlotte, and all points north into NC. That spreads across the state in the day, its very similar to the NAM. So far, I think the models are a little too cold by a fraction this far south, but for the mountains and nw Piedmont I'd say theres a definite shot at snow falling atleast. Check out the water vapor and how much pushing the upper features are doing. http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satellite/displaySat.php?region=US&itype=wv&size=large&endDate=20110327&endTime=-1&duration=8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjames1992 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Bufkit shows 3.7" of snow for GSO... http://www.meteor.iastate.edu/~ckarsten/bufkit/data/cobb_nam/nam_kgso.dat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triadwx Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Would love too get 2-3". That's what the NAM has shown all weekend, plus the WRF saying "Yes" as well..hmm tomorrow morning is going to be interesting up here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastonwxman Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 GSP just included that wintry chance for my area: Monday: Rain, snow, and sleet before noon, then a chance of rain. High near 51. Northeast wind between 5 and 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 80%. New snow and sleet accumulation of less than a half inch possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triadwx Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 GSP just included that wintry chance for my area: Monday: Rain, snow, and sleet before noon, then a chance of rain. High near 51. Northeast wind between 5 and 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 80%. New snow and sleet accumulation of less than a half inch possible. I just read GSP's AFD and they are interested in this. RAH hasn't updated since 10:40 so Im going to be interested in what they think. They are probably going to down play any possibility, and then be right...like normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCBlizzard Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Would love to see some flakes flying but not counting on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Wow... I've been watching the potential, but never really thought we had a shot. However, with the increasing amounts projected for precipitation, it will likely create an isothermal layer down to 2000ft, very similar to the the early march storm... although this time, we have colder soundings. If this event mainly occurs at night like its projected, it should be able to aid higher snowfall totals. I'll post a more full update later today! Folks in the piedmont are in this one too because of the hybrid damming setup. This might be one of those rare cases where some of the far NW mountains of NC will remain rain, while the dammed regions further east get in on the heavy wet snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCBlizzard Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 GSP new HWO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jalba Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triadwx Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I love how it starts to turn pink as it gets into Davidson county. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griteater Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 RGEM looks to be in line with the GFS regarding temps / snow line. NAM looks noticeably colder than those 2. It has a tendency to be too cold in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoothillsNC Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I'm making a full text update on the other thread, but here's my visual call on this: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Soundings wise... the GFS and NAM are night and day. GFS is easily all rain, and not even close The NAM meanwhile is isothermal with heavy snow occurring at 9z From the looks of it, it is likely going to depend on precipitation rates since we will need diabatic cooling with melting of precipitation aloft to bring down the snow levels to the valley floor. It should become obvious if the NAM projected precipitation output will exist as convection blossoms over Arkansas and Tennessee in the next 3-6 hours. The resolution of the GFS is likely not enough to resolve the freezing line dropping southward across the French Broad River as heavy precipitation moves in over the cold dome in place over most of NC. Thus, I give a slight advantage to the NAM, although I'm very skeptical about precipitation amounts at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCSNOW Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I'm making a full text update on the other thread, but here's my visual call on this: Can't wait. Would love one more shot at seeing my favorite type of weather. It's a long time till December. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCBlizzard Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 I'm making a full text update on the other thread, but here's my visual call on this: Would love to see that extended a little further south Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griteater Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 From Raleigh NWS... HAVE DECIDED TO FORECAST A RAIN/SNOW MIX POSSIBLE IN THE N/NW PIEDMONT DURING THE MORNING. SOME ACCUMULATION CANNOT BE ENTIRELY RULED OUT *IF* PRECIPITATION RATES AND THERMODYNAMIC PROFILES ARE SUFFICIENT FOR A BRIEF PERIOD OF LIGHT/MODERATE PRECIP FALLING ENTIRELY AS SNOW. HOWEVER...EVEN IN WINTER...PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WOULD SUGGEST THAT IF THE POSSIBILITY FOR A PTYPE OF ALL SNOW IS CONTINGENT ON SEVERAL FACTORS (I.E. EVAP COOLING OR MELTING AND PRECIP RATES)...THEN A PTYPE FORECAST OF ALL LIQUID OR A MIX AT BEST WITH NO ACCUMULATION IS TYPICALLY THE BETTER FORECAST. -VINCENT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
triadwx Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 From Raleigh NWS... HAVE DECIDED TO FORECAST A RAIN/SNOW MIX POSSIBLE IN THE N/NW PIEDMONT DURING THE MORNING. SOME ACCUMULATION CANNOT BE ENTIRELY RULED OUT *IF* PRECIPITATION RATES AND THERMODYNAMIC PROFILES ARE SUFFICIENT FOR A BRIEF PERIOD OF LIGHT/MODERATE PRECIP FALLING ENTIRELY AS SNOW. HOWEVER...EVEN IN WINTER...PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WOULD SUGGEST THAT IF THE POSSIBILITY FOR A PTYPE OF ALL SNOW IS CONTINGENT ON SEVERAL FACTORS (I.E. EVAP COOLING OR MELTING AND PRECIP RATES)...THEN A PTYPE FORECAST OF ALL LIQUID OR A MIX AT BEST WITH NO ACCUMULATION IS TYPICALLY THE BETTER FORECAST. -VINCENT I called the pessimism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 The fact that we are so close to the event, means its already nearly nowcasting time... just looking upstream, you can already see significant amounts of convection firing in Arkansas where no model had any precipitation occurring by this time. The nam has little reflection of convection at 21z Unfortunately even the RUC is handling the firing convection very poorly currently. Current Radar: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solak Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 WRAL is on board.. via Facebook No April Fools Joke: April 1st is days away but you may think this is an early joke...it is not. We have some light snow in the forecast tomorrow morning as a weak upper level disturbance crosses North Carolina. Tonight we may briefly clear allowing temperatures to bottom out near freezing. Tomorrow mnorning this next system arrives during the morning commute. We are looking at either some light snow or a rain/snow mix from the Triangle northward. Here is a look at potential snowfall accumulations. This is likely only on grassy and elevated surfaces as the roads will be too warm for any significant accumulation. Could Greg go in the fountain?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superjames1992 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 WRAL is going full speed ahead with their forecast. Oh my! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 WRAL is going full speed ahead with their forecast. Oh my! Too ballsy IMO, they're going to be humiliated, even if they change it last minute tonight. Never have I seen such a forecast this far into March. Raleigh NWS (Vincent) is right, a rain to mix situation is much more likely for our area, now out W and NW of Raleigh that's another story, maybe. This snuck up on me as probably a few of you too, so lets get this thread going! Model time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calculus1 Posted March 27, 2011 Share Posted March 27, 2011 Now, that graphic from WRAL is what you call "bullish." They aren't hedging their bets at all. I hope they're right, but that has huge bust potential, too. Will the precip even make it that far north into VA? Don't get me wrong, I like the graphic, but I'm astonished they're putting in all they're chips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.