Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,235

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. brooklynwx99
    that setup for the 20th it has is wild lmao
  2. brooklynwx99
    the GFS still isn't really like the ECMWF. the evolution is the same as the 00/06z runs, but it's just less amped. doesn't do what the ECWMF does with the trough
  3. brooklynwx99
    the GFS still isn't really like the ECMWF. the evolution is the same as the 00/06z runs, but it's just less amped. doesn't do what the ECWMF does with the trough
  4. brooklynwx99
    the GFS and ECMWF still aren't similar. the GFS just didn't amp the trough as much, it didn't change the evolution overall
  5. brooklynwx99
    i don’t think that AK vort is the whole reason. the CMC has the same feature and amps up just fine. i think the ECMWF just struggles consolidating the trough itself
  6. brooklynwx99
    i don’t think that AK vort is the whole reason. the CMC has the same feature and amps up just fine. i think the ECMWF just struggles consolidating the trough itself
  7. brooklynwx99
    i don’t think that AK vort is the whole reason. the CMC has the same feature and amps up just fine. i think the ECMWF just struggles consolidating the trough itself
  8. brooklynwx99
    i can see how it’s bias to overamp and hold energy back can be an issue here instead of ejecting the trailing wave, it remains disorganized and the trough never buckles just a hypothesis. it is certainly an outlier, but we’ll see
  9. brooklynwx99
    EPS is aggressive with the 20th
  10. brooklynwx99
    the ECMWF's bias to hold energy back and overamp could initially hurt trough consolidation. honestly, I'm not really sure why it's doing what it's doing. the CMC and UKMET both have that piece crashing into AK and still become amplified, so that's not it in a vacuum
  11. brooklynwx99
    true, but the EPS could easily show that the OP is well south and east like it did at 12z. we'll see if that's the case again. i have a sneaking suspicion that it probably is
  12. brooklynwx99
    it's more consolidated, but it remains an outlier
  13. brooklynwx99
    it's not THAT much better than any of the other models at this point. it's an outlier and should be treated as such until other models move towards it or it caves
  14. brooklynwx99
    at least charge me rent if i'm going to live in your head, dude
  15. brooklynwx99
    what exactly would you like me to do about that
  16. brooklynwx99
    it literally is an improvement. why are you up my ass lmao
  17. brooklynwx99
    ECMWF is better. more consolidated trough, taller PNA, higher downstream heights
  18. brooklynwx99
    the "clipper from hell" archetype potential seems to be higher than normal for the 20th lmao
  19. brooklynwx99
    I think that this could be a bit northern stream focused, so I would urge caution down here. however, there can easily be region-wide major storm potential with that general synoptic pattern
  20. brooklynwx99
    this is what you want to see for the 20th. the TPV splits into two distinct features... a 50/50 ULL and a digging, potent shortwave
  21. brooklynwx99
    this is what you want to see for the 20th. the TPV splits into two distinct features... a 50/50 ULL and a digging shortwave
  22. brooklynwx99
    UKMET thermals are notoriously bad
  23. brooklynwx99
    I think we're in a good spot here. signal is growing, cold air is in place, and the overall synoptic pattern is great. finally something to talk about other than the MJO lmao
  24. brooklynwx99
    new UKMET is a coastal bomb
  25. brooklynwx99
    CMC is a space cadet right now. it’s still trending towards the other models and has been doing so for two model cycles now i think it represents the western end of the envelope
×
×
  • Create New...