Jump to content

brooklynwx99

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    6,235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by brooklynwx99

  1. the CMC and UKMET are also much better looking out west. I am definitely taking the GFS with a grain of salt but it's not that far off, and the PNA has been trending better for a while now
  2. FWIW the CMC did make some nice shifts synoptically
  3. the trend with the PNA over the last model cycle has been pretty nice. went from a trough to a full latitude ridge on the GEFS over BC
  4. agreed, though the trend for more -NAO probably does limit the extent of the warmth
  5. dude that was two weeks ago, damn
  6. it's an operational model at 10 days out. it will do that, as will any other OP at this range
  7. all ensembles maintain a signal for the 9-10th, just a matter of phasing. worth keeping an eye on
  8. GEFS has quite a signal with lots of strong coastals
  9. the transient 50/50 and -EPO do help this threat. the synoptics are there, it just needs to deliver with a phase
  10. next shot at something more substantial is probably the 9-10th as the cutter drops the TPV down and a wave tries to amp into the colder airmass with the transient PNA spike. after that, it's likely curtains outside of NNE with some warm weather on the way
  11. the AIFS humping is going to be unbearable for a while. past 5 days it isn't as good as any other model, really
  12. he shits on every storm threat that has ever formed
  13. i saw people even comparing this to Jan 2015. that was on a totally different level of fail. not even close
  14. yeah, trust me, it was one of the more stunning model collapses in the last several years. absolutely sucked
  15. yup, I will reassess in 2030 or so. the sample size is just too small and we could get blasted a few times to close the decade for all anyone knows. people also thought the massive WC ridges from 2013-15 were going to be the new norm. how laughable that seems now
  16. i mean, it is, but 48 hours is a bit much. the models capitulated and it totally blew, but it was at 120-144 hours out. that happens. we're in agreement that it would be a different story if we were inside of three days god, i can't wait for an effective El Nino. hopefully next year
  17. that's kinda silly. that attitude is borne out of frustration rather than anything scientific
  18. yup, some people never understand that good patterns just increase the odds for snow, not guarantee it. we literally just saw that play out this week!
  19. anything of substance to add? no? no wonder why mets barely post here anymore. doesn't seem to be an issue in other subforums
  20. we'll have more chances into March. cold with -AO/-EPO persisting
  21. I'm banking on shorter wavelengths and a weak WAR to help us out here
  22. this is quite a bit healthier. like seeing the -AO over the top too. pretty solid
×
×
  • Create New...