Jump to content

Windspeed

Members
  • Posts

    4,156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Windspeed

  1. http://www.essc.psu.edu/essc_web/research/Hurricane2020.html
  2. Hank is an intelligent chaser and is usually cautious but, yeah, he was too close there. I'd imagine his wife will tan his hide over that one. Even the best chasers are still human and prone to mistakes. Being a professional storm chaser is a life that is susceptible to risks.
  3. Well then. Definitely going to want to pay close attention to how this evolves over the coming days.
  4. Drone footage of the damage in East Chattanooga:
  5. RE: Discrete, semi-discrete and QLCS cells.. They can all produce violent tornadoes when you have intense parameters like CAPE and bulk shear. There was a period of time yesterday that when it appeared convection was going to go more linear that many, myself included, imagined the event was going to bust. Some to the point of it's going to be a flop mentality. Yet clearly beyond the two main discretes that produced the preliminary EF3 and EF4 twisters in MS, we are going to be presented with numerous violent tornadoes that were produced by quasi-linear cells. We have to realize or change thinking that just because an event doesn't produce the classic string pearls or 5-10 long-tracking individual discretes, it is somehow less of an event. This one in particular wasn't just an outbreak, but a very infamously memorable one. The parameters were just nuts and what we got was indicative of them.
  6. This year in particular has already been a memorable one for tornadoes in the Tennessee Valley. We've not only had destructive touchdowns, but they've unfortunately gone through urban and dense residential areas. So far, one EF2, two EF3s and one EF4 have all been destructive killers in the greater Tennessee Valley region. The season is far from over as well. The pattern in days 5 through 14 is looks suspicious in setup and midrange modeling. We'll have a quiet week. But next week may be active again.
  7. Not heard anything out of Ooltewah yet. I am hoping that the tornado weakened as rapidly as it intensified. The CC appeared to be weakening just as the intense circulation unraveled over Ooltewah proper. However, that went crazy fast and may've unfortunately hit some residential structures.
  8. Quite a number of QLCS tornadoes have occurred already in the semi-inear line moving out of LA. One in particular appears to have been quite violent near Monroe earlier.
  9. SPC AC 121630 Day 1 Convective Outlook NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman OK 1130 AM CDT Sun Apr 12 2020 Valid 121630Z - 131200Z ...THERE IS A MODERATE RISK OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS NORTHEAST LA...SOUTHEAST AR...MS...AL...WESTERN GA...SOUTHERN MIDDLE TN... ...SUMMARY... An outbreak of severe thunderstorms is likely through tonight, with the greatest threat expected from northeast Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, southern Middle Tennessee and western Georgia. Strong tornadoes, widespread damaging winds, and large hail are all possible. ...Synopsis... A complex forecast with multiple scenarios possible across a broad area from the Lower MS Valley into the TN/OH Valleys and the Southeast. A compact shortwave trough over the Edwards Plateau of TX will accelerate east-northeast into the Ark-La-Miss by this evening and towards eastern KY/TN by the end of the period, in response to continued amplification of a large-scale trough over the north-central states. ...Northwest LA to northern AL/middle TN... An ongoing MCS with a history of several confirmed but brief TDSs earlier this morning will continue to move east-northeast along an intensifying baroclinic zone across parts of northern/central MS into northern AL/middle TN. Tornadoes and damaging winds will be likely with this MCS which will include a mixed convective mode of bowing segments and potential supercells developing just ahead of the cluster on its southern flank. The presence of upper 60s to low 70s surface dew points in much of LA and southern MS will spread north and likely reach northern MS to western AL between 21-00Z. This should overlap strong low-level shear (0-1 km SRH of 400+ m2/s2) as the low-level jet strengthens and shifts northeast. The environment will favor embedded supercells capable of producing strong tornadoes and damaging winds, the most substantial of which may occur from northeast LA through north-central MS into northern AL and southern middle TN. There is still enough uncertainty with regard to convection outpacing stronger surface-based instability (especially with northeast extent), as well as the overall convective mode, to preclude an upgrade to High Risk. ...Southern MS to GA/Carolinas... To the south of the initial MCS crossing northern MS/AL into TN, a separate pre-frontal band of convection is expected to become sustained by early evening from southern MS into central AL. This convection will be well east of the synoptic cold front, in an environment with moderate surface-based buoyancy and very strong vertical shear. A broken band of embedded supercells appears likely to develop through the evening and overnight, with an associated threat for strong tornadoes and damaging winds. The pre-frontal convection should reach the western Carolinas by 09-12z. ...Lower Red River Valley to the OH Valley... An arc of convection will likely form later this afternoon just ahead of the compact shortwave trough and associated surface cyclone in eastern OK to northeast TX, within the left-exit region of the mid-upper jet. This convection will subsequently spread east then northeast across the Mid-South during the late afternoon/evening. The northward extent of destabilization in AR/western TN this afternoon/evening will depend largely on the intensity and extent of the early-day MCS moving from LA into northern MS. Still, steep midlevel lapse rates with the ejecting mid-level wave and strong deep-layer vertical shear will favor fast-moving supercells and line segments capable of producing large hail and damaging winds. The northeast extent of the damaging wind and tornado threat into tonight will depend largely on how widespread/organized the convection is across northern MS/AL this afternoon/evening, and the degree of low-level recovery in the wake of that convection. ..Grams/Bentley.. 04/12/2020 CLICK TO GET WUUS01 PTSDY1 PRODUCT NOTE: THE NEXT DAY 1 OUTLOOK IS SCHEDULED BY 2000Z CURRENT UTC TIME: 1736Z (1:36PM), RELOAD THIS PAGE TO UPDATE THE TIME
  10. Incredible structures on those SCs even if they aren't producing tornadoes. Beautiful mesos and clearly damaging hail cores. Edit: That meso intensified. Looks like it may've even briefly produced. There may've even been another brief TDS east of the main meso.
  11. SREF posted in TN Valley subforum by@jaxjagman ...
  12. The coverage in the warm sector is large. People are expecting a string of pearls, however, these may very well be scattered cells in close proximity over a wide coverage area. The initial explosive convection in the warm sector that would be suspect and tornadic doesn't look particularly linear to me. Edit: RE :18z HRRR. I should add that the convection on the backside of that warm sector does take on a more linear look, but not until after plenty of intial suspiciously discrete convection has already moved NE into the upper TN Valley.
  13. Could see a scenario where modeling really doesn't start coming into line until around 18z tomorrow. This mainly due to differences in handling phase timing and tilt so far. You'd think within 24 hrs they should be close enough that those differences get ironed out for a better consensus. Perhaps? By that point we'll all be focusing on 3km mesoscales anyway.
  14. Not familiar with this model. Viper based? At any rate, reckon that's about as much a worst case scenario as I've seen. I actually lol'd when I saw this on the SE thread. Hopefully this is slightly overdoing things. Edit: Nevermind, this is a proprietary model based off the WRF.
  15. He does give a worst case scenario that would lead to a high end outbreak however. He explains different possibilities and why, which is why I shared.
  16. Very good thread/discussion by Cameron Nixon, a post-grad atmospheric scientist doing his PHD work @ CMU. He seems to know his stuff. At any rate, knowledgeable enough to warrant sharing his thoughts on the upcoming event: This comment in particular: Edit: He also does point out a worst-case scenario based on nuances in the recent ECMWF runs that suggest a small extension of the shortwave during initial phase. This would amplify the low-level flow, increase instability and allow capping to break down ahead of the linear mode.
  17. ..and not often you see a hatched area that large for a Day 3 Moderate. Potential is key. Seriousness of the situation needs to get out early. If it becomes high risk, at least we had ample warning. If it doesn't pan out, better to have heeded the eyebrow-raising model guidance than to be too conservative and to regret those that were complacent I suppose.
  18. Sharing this post concerning the SREF's sigtor probs from the SE forum:
×
×
  • Create New...