SnowGoose69

Could be dare I say some inland 80 plus highs late next week if ensembles are right and it’s not showery or overcast. That second part is a big if now

Those hoping for the Central Park record we need big time help right now lol. Unless we have a nasty bust on the short range models they’re gonna get 0.6 I think on a snow board with trees around

The HRRR at hour 18 is markedly less stupid over SNE with low placement than the 18Z HRRR run was at hour 22 so maybe its beginning to get an idea. I could see 00Z runs finally agreeing for the most part

What probably is going to happen is when this thing finally organizes tonight the 06 and 12Z runs will all finally agree and be similar

That NAM run would not be bad even down this way if we were like 5 degrees colder

The dewpoints are fairly good on the models tomorrow late AM into the afternoon...if somehow some way there is a steady light snow I think those areas will easily fall to 30-32 tomorrow afternoon...the DPs and air mass in place to the north with the last event did not have that

That 18Z HRRR was hilarious for ERN MASS...that would be quite a blown forecast

The bust potential across most of CT is really big with this because if the models are even slightly wrong on the idea of that secondary low signature being too strong those areas will probably get alot more snow

Well...this might tell you where the NWS is headed in their afternoon update for the Hartford area lol... TERMINAL FORECAST BDL NWS 131730 KBDL 131727Z 1318/1424 12010KT P6SM VCSH BKN026 OVC040 FM132000 11009KT P6SM -RA OVC015 FM132200 09009KT 1 1/2SM -RA BR OVC008 FM140800 04014G23KT 1SM RA BR OVC008 FM141200 03018G31KT 3/4SM -RA BR OVC008 FM141500 01021G35KT 1/2SM -RA OVC008 FM142000 35023G38KT 3/4SM -RA BR OVC008

My memory is the RAP tends to have a west bias at this range

The HREF is again going too high...mean is like 2-4 near the metro but its been consistently bad this year after it was very good last winter

Yeah...I posted in the NYC forum how on 2/8/13 we were snowing heavy here with a surface low over Cape Cod at 06z. you can get a mass expansion of the snow shield in the window when there is a close off and full phase

The GFS was not exactly good either, it was sending this to Bermuda...it was more correct for the wrong reason

The good news is its due for an upgrade soon...the bad news as a poster said here last night is the NAM is set to be discontinued perhaps....its fallen behind schedule since the plan was for the HRRR to run to 84 I believe, but as we've seen the HRRR often has a major BL cool bias beyond 18-24 and sometimes even a midlevel one too

Yeah he's not wrong with his ideas. I saw that on twitter...I do not buy the huge snow shield the HRRR/3K have back into our area tomorrow at all. I understand what they're keying in on to have that but to me the system is simply closed off a tad too far east for that to happen...its not crazy though that maybe the N Fork of cntrl to E Suffolk and maybe places like HVN could get in on a decent period of snow in the afternoon tomorrow. The DPs are cold enough this time that no question on a N flow places could get to 32-33 and accumulate

I think where you are the HRRR/3k ideas tomorrow are not that crazy but the snows it shows back as far as SW CT to me are probably bogus as the whole evolution of the storm IMO is too sloppy to produce that degree of snow coverage

I'd take the CMC idea from 48-54...it would probably be mostly snow in the city despite what it shows if that unfolded. the 700mb temps of -11 to -12C are colder than the magic number often used to determine if in a scenario you're trying to cool the airmass in a CCB scenario you want to see -10C or colder at 700 to be confident you're going to get down to 33-34 or less at the surface...this is a rule some older mets have used

This is such a wildly convoluted set up I probably wouldn’t trust anything at the moment. Chances are you can throw out the NAM GFS and probably just mix the euro and the Canadian but as we saw on the 6z RGEM it barely even has any snow in Boston. the problem is the RGM is a fairly lousy model past 48 too with a set up such as this. It can do well with simple systems beyond 48 but when it comes to convoluted phases and coastal systems with phasing and captures it can be pretty terrible past 48.

I'd be fairly scared if I was them about going big at all with snow right now near the coast but I'd probably at least cover with 1-2 inches possibly for now

The UKIE made like 3 attempts to go full GFS in the 18 hours prior to it fully consolidating. You can see not just the GFS is struggling with the evolution of this

It was sort of 00Z NAM/GFSish at 12Z...it tried to do it again but did it less and consolidated better which is what made the difference

We've seen double barreled setups before with these E coast storms but not in setups such as this

As we saw on 2/8/13 you can get pretty big snows with the surface low way east if you have completed the entire capture and phase...NYC was snowing heavily at 06Z that night with the SFC low way east. I would not exactly expect that we are going to get that scenario though http://www.meteo.psu.edu/ewall/NARR/2013/us0209.php

The problem we have is even the Euro is way too warm at 925 for most of the event as was posted in the SNE forum (you can see maps there on recent pages) you'd basically not snow here til roughly 78 hours or so. No question the more SRN stream this trends the more likely we see big snows here. You might see models move hard one way or the other at 12 or 00Z today now that everything is onshore

This setup is probably too convoluted for the NAM to get it right at this range.