Jump to content

WxUSAF

Moderator Meteorologist
  • Posts

    24,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WxUSAF

  1. 5 days out: everyone sets unreasonable lower bound expectations based on the best model run

    2 days out: everyone jumps when they realize it’s not going to be a HECS for them 

    1 day out: most people accept reality and realize yes, it’s going to snow

    4-8 hours out: radar hallucinations

    1 day after: everyone’s happy and can’t wait to get the next storm 

     

     

    every. Single. Time.

    • Like 4
  2. 7 minutes ago, jayyy said:

    Interested to see what the GFS/ICON/EPS/RGEM do at 12z. More concerned with the trend than the verbatim solution. 

    I'm not convinced there's any trend at all. It's wobbling back and forth for the reasons I and others have laid out.  6z Euro wobbled left, 6z RGEM wobbled right.  And these moves are so small in reality, even if it did "trend" left for 4 runs, a bump right on tomorrow's 12z runs could easily happen that would put it right back where it started. This (and other reasons) is why snowfall forecasts always have ranges.  

    • Like 3
  3. 1 minute ago, osfan24 said:

    Not based on that above snowfall map. Woof.

    At this range the Op runs are much prioritized and you really never should use ensembles snowmaps for prime forecasting methods.  I know we all look at them but it's not what ensembles are for.  Op Euro, GGEM, and GFS all give us a really nice storm.  It's going to wobble back and forth a little and then come down to mesoscale/microscale features in the end like it always does on final snow amounts.  But the goalposts have narrowed and stayed in place pretty much for the last 48-72 hours.  There's no primary to Cleveland or Miller B screw job on the way.  It's not suppressed or OTS.  It's a coast-running Miller A in mid-December.  Thermal gradient is more onshore than it would be in January-March due to the water temp and respectable, but unremarkable, cold airmass ahead of the storm.  Give me that basic information alone and I think I could give you a snow forecast that would be pretty reasonable for most of the area... 

    • Like 6
    • Thanks 3
  4. 2 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

    I keep hoping we see the Euro back off these NW pushes and get closer to the GFS solution. It will really make a huge difference for us. I've seen my totals around 16 inches on some runs with bigger totals not all that far NW of me but then closer to 8 on others with much smaller totals not that far to my SE.

    Every model, even the GFS, has this baggy area of low pressure stretching from onshore to well offshore as it approaches and pass our latitude.  Where the "L" gets put on the surface map isn't always a fine science.  All comes down to how convection plays in (we really won't know this until tomorrow or Wednesday) and where the surface low starts to get stacked with the upper level energy. That later detail just keeps wobbling just onshore and just offshore.  

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  5. 1 minute ago, MillvilleWx said:

    For sure. This has Fall Line special written all over it. Massive increases the further north and west you go with this one. Then pinning down the CCB will be another fun task. That's where the real fun totals will come out. 

    I really, really want that CCB.  Seems like the front half of the storm is pretty well set for MBY.  3-5" of snow+sleet.  

    • Like 2
  6. 3 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

    I never move from the Euro since it's got a great resolution and is good with large scale forcing mechanisms. The mesoscale is definitely not good for it, but that's where our short term guidance will come in play. It gets mixed more with other guidance for decision making and review for trends. GFS is in the same boat as the Euro since it has fairly similar properties for large scale ascent depictions.

    Seems like we've seen 0z/6z euro runs bump NW and then 12z runs move SE.  All-in-all, these are ultimately small differences, even if this was 24hrs before start time, but it obviously makes a big difference to most of us in snow totals.  

    • Like 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, cbmclean said:

    Please excuse the novice question, but what is "the benchmark"?

    40N/70W is the classic location from the KU book for major east coast snow storms.  That's past our latitude, but when it's at the benchmark a storm is usually about to hit NYC and Boston.  

    • Like 1
  8. 18 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

    18z EPS has the surface low in exactly the canonical spot, ~50mi off OCMD, at 6z Thursday.  Don't overthink things.  Use the ensembles the way they're supposed to be used for, not agonizing over 5-10mi wiggles in 10:1 snow maps.  Going forward now, we can start seeing mesoscale effects like thermal profiles and banding.  

    After 6z Thursday it really doesn't gain much more latitude.  Just moves ENE out to sea.  That's very nice for us.  Better chance the CCB cranks overhead and then snows itself out as the storm moves away. Some of the runs where the CCB is much farther north into the Poconos and NY state had the storm moving toward the benchmark and farther NE.  

    • Like 3
  9. 4 minutes ago, losetoa6 said:

    Improving each run 

     

    hrrr-conus-dc-total_snow_kuchera-7979600.png

    Light Accumulations starting to get into Howard and northern Montgomery 

    Ha, that little dot in eastern Howard County is the higher terrain near Howard High School.  Gets up to 500-600' on that hill.  That's like 2-3mi from my house as the crow flies. 

  10. 18z EPS has the surface low in exactly the canonical spot, ~50mi off OCMD, at 6z Thursday.  Don't overthink things.  Use the ensembles the way they're supposed to be used for, not agonizing over 5-10mi wiggles in 10:1 snow maps.  Going forward now, we can start seeing mesoscale effects like thermal profiles and banding.  

    • Like 14
×
×
  • Create New...