Jump to content

CheeselandSkies

Members
  • Posts

    2,971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CheeselandSkies

  1. I think he's referring to the anti-lockdown protests (armed buffoons in the MI state capitol, etc) which pre-dated the racial justice protests.
  2. Hopefully it means an end to this highs in the 30s in Oct crap.
  3. Also that the WPAC, apparently out of spite, supposedly caused some of the Atlantic systems' struggles by Typhoon Maysak contributing to the formation of a TUTT in the Atlantic in September which reduced the intensity/longevity of some of the MDR systems.
  4. One last hurrah for some rumblers tomorrow? https://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/outlook/day2otlk.html
  5. '07-'08 was my last year attending UW-Green Bay with winter break trip home so I got to experience it in both northeast and south-central Wisconsin. As I recall your assessment is accurate.
  6. I'd take the constant storminess over the extended arctic air and modest-to-moderate snowstorms. '13-'14 got to be brutal and my power bills were astronomical in my electric-heated apartment.
  7. I will take that, we were buried in snow most of DJF but there was that early-mid January thaw that also included a regional tornado outbreak.
  8. Yeah. Given seasonal indicators/ENSO state and SSTs/OHC in the vicinity I thought GFS/GEFS were on point with a hurricane, potentially a Mitch/Wilma-like beast coming out of the Caribbean. Now...not so much.
  9. As much as I'd love to see something like that, I don't buy it for a second.
  10. It's not a "media claim." It's based on a 126 MPH measurement at Atkins and a 140 MPH estimate by DVN survey in Cedar Rapids. Granted those are gusts, but you don't really see sustained winds of that magnitude on land in any but perhaps the very strongest hurricanes (think Irma in the Leewards, Dorian in the Bahamas).
  11. I'd rather we were the new Southern Plains in terms of tornado potential, but that doesn't seem to be happening (at least not on a reliable/predictable A/M/J basis).
  12. Yes...yes. It seems that is what needs to happen to get quality severe weather in the central CONUS again.
  13. I have Prospero on Ignore due to his conspiracy-mongering.
  14. Anyone else see the 06Z GEFS and GFS op? (at work so can't post it, but suffice to say it was...eyebrow raising)
  15. Michael was basically the unicorn of landfalls. In the CONUS, in daylight, with a perfectly formed stadium eyewall untouched by EWRC or dry air; yet it is barely talked about outside of those it impacted and those who chased it.
  16. Because seeding doesn't work. They thought StormFury was working, then they figured out EWRCs and dry air intrusions were a thing.
  17. So LA gets the big wind and the big surge...just from different storms.
  18. Yeah, this one has really underachieved in the satellite porn department especially considering the waters it has gone over. 2020 - 25? 26? tropical cyclones and maybe four quality eyes visible for 1-12 hours each?
  19. Unless it's on a due W track through the Bahamas heading for Miami.
×
×
  • Create New...