Jump to content

RDRY

Members
  • Posts

    686
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RDRY

  1. It's also showing some upper-air energy dropping south on the back end, which keeps light snow going.
  2. It's coming!!! https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2019/02/14/weather-service-prepares-launch-new-prediction-model-that-many-forecasters-dont-trust/?utm_term=.4750253ec44d
  3. This still feels like an interior-and-north event for mainly snow. That SE ridge has been fierce.
  4. We're like diabetics enjoying a spoonful of chocolate mousse.
  5. A 943 low east of Maine. Now that's funny.
  6. The futurecast radar runs that line into Guatemala.
  7. But this Arctic "high" is more like a band of cold air than an actual high pressure center. There's almost no north-south orientation to it, so any southerly flow has tons of room to push north.
  8. The position and strength do look classic. But - maybe this is a complete misinterpretation on my part - the isobars around the high do not look classic. They aren't curved. It looks like just a fast, flat flow of Arctic air, which may explain why many of the models are forcing the system so far north, as the high is not really pressing south. If anything, it's giving up a little ground.
  9. GFS seriously needs to be scrapped at this point. Just start over.
  10. The GFS and its illegitimate brother zig when the other models zag.
  11. Don't think it's much of a factor, but the Western ridge is getting beaten down a bit more by a system moving in.
  12. GFS finds the soft spot in the high pressure zone and attacks it.
  13. I'm considering freezing rain frozen precip, but yeah. No way this stays snow for the coast per the Euro.
  14. The SLP track is just slightly north of due east from 120 to 168, and stays south of NYC. That should keep this mostly frozen.
  15. The new GFS 12z was on crack. That would be biblical.
  16. Has the new GFS been better or worse than the current one? It seems to be much more erratic.
  17. NP. Didn't take it that way. Anyway, a flatter pattern can work just fine with decent cold air to the north -- those storms are usually pretty easy to forecast a few days out. Less angst over coastal development timing, blocking, minute track adjustments, etc.
  18. Nor should you. It was just an observation of a pattern we haven't seen much of in a while.
  19. One things seems pretty clear this winter -- northward model adjustments will not be the rule of the day. Flat and fast flow.
  20. Has the new GFS been worse than the old one? If so, how can the NOAA make the switch?
  21. This was a perfect "storm" for commuter chaos. A mid-November forecast of an inch then rain right up until game time. Followed by early to mid afternoon inch-an-hour, sticking snows. The city had no chance on this one.
  22. What else is new. I thought the GFS was getting an "overhaul."
×
×
  • Create New...