Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Damn that was significantly better at h5…one more of those?
  3. It phases slower, but the surface low tracks much further west. Make sense? Of course not, its the NAM.
  4. If we can clean up that funky lead energy that is elongating things to the east initially, we'd really be in business. A massive improvement overall as it is.
  5. Idc what the end result is but wow. To me this looked better than the gfs or euro as early as hr 45
  6. Looks much better yes but why is it a close miss? Not enough phasing?
  7. That backside vort actually adds angular momentum to the trough to give it the "boost" it needs and tilts it up the coast. NAM is verbatim a huge Delmarva crusher
  8. Dare I say that the 3k NAM looks better than the 12k at hr 60? Of course it cuts off there so it leaves a lot to be imagined.
  9. Nam surface low is way west at 00z Monday
  10. @CAPE @csnavywx thanks for the quick recap, appreciate not having to wade through the main thread to get to the main things to track over the next runs
  11. That's kinda the point...making definitive statements about model solutions this many days out still ...
  12. Shift west on the Nammer Sent from my SM-S166V using Tapatalk
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...