Welcome to American Weather
|
Welcome to American Weather, serving top-notch weather discussion, info, and knowledge from professionals and amateurs across the United States. You must register to post in our forums, but this is a simple and free process. Please click the "Register Now" button to join or sign in now if you're already a part of the community. Being a part of our community lets you:
|
#1
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:36 PM
There is a color picture of the tornado around 1:20. There's a chilling moment at 4:19 when he mentions a car falling out of the sky onto 95th street.
http://oaklawn.patch...o#video-5722274
Advertisement
Want to browse ad-free? Purchase our Gold Upgrade Package.
#2
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:54 PM
Considering population growth in Chicagoland since then, I'd have to think that a similar event would end just as badly or worse if it happened now, better warnings notwithstanding.
#3
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:56 PM
This was probably the last tornado to touchdown inside the urban core of Cook County? Some people think areas are immune to tornadoes in urban areas and close to the lake, but that is not true!
#4
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:56 PM
andyhb, on 17 February 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:
Considering population growth in Chicagoland since then, I'd have to think that a similar event would end just as badly or worse if it happened now.
It's officially listed as 200 yards wide but path widths aren't an exact science. It's pretty clear the zone of intense damage was fairly narrow.
#5
Posted 17 February 2012 - 05:58 PM
Geos, on 17 February 2012 - 05:56 PM, said:
This was probably the last tornado to touchdown inside the urban core of Cook County? Some people think areas are immune to tornadoes in urban areas and close to the lake, but that is not true!
Depends how you define urban core. If you don't count the Lemont tornadoes of 1991 and 1976, then this was the last intense tornado. There have been weaker ones since then.
#6
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:05 PM
Hoosier, on 17 February 2012 - 05:58 PM, said:
Ok. I have to remember Cook County wasn't as developed as before either. I would define urban as a certain number of people per square mile. There have been a couple weak to moderate intense tornadoes on the north side that I can remember. One hit Zion in April of 1996. Path was only a block, but it was rated at F2. I think Gurnee, IL was hit that same evening as well.
#7
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:10 PM
Geos, on 17 February 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:
Ok. I have to remember Cook County wasn't as developed as before either. I would define urban as a certain number of people per square mile. There have been a couple weak to moderate intense tornadoes on the north side that I can remember. One hit Zion in April of 1996. Path was only a block, but it was rated at F2. I think Gurnee, IL was hit that same evening as well.
The fringes of Cook county probably weren't as developed but IIRC, Oak Lawn had around 20,000 people at the time of the tornado. A bigger issue the urban spread out into the collar counties, just waiting to get mowed down by the next violent tornado.
#8
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:19 PM
#9
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:20 PM
#10
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:21 PM
cyclone77, on 17 February 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:
I know lol. It's just eerie how he's outside talking to those women about the other tornadoes that day. Little did he know what was about to happen.
#11
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:23 PM
Hoosier, on 17 February 2012 - 06:21 PM, said:
Yeah he even mentioned Moline. I'll have to go back and check to see if there were any out this way that day. He also mentioned Belvidere. I remember them getting hit by a bad tornado, but I don't know if it was this day or not. I'm sure some of the historians in this sub forum would know off the top of their head.
#12
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:24 PM
cyclone77, on 17 February 2012 - 06:23 PM, said:
Yep, that was the same outbreak. Was the day that the high school got hit (It was an F4 as well).
#13
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:25 PM
andyhb, on 17 February 2012 - 06:24 PM, said:
Ahh, ok. Thanks man! I remember hearing about that tornado when I was a little kid in grade school. One of the teachers was into weather, and anytime we had to do tornado drills he brought that up.
#14
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:32 PM
http://www.wundergro...eq_statename=NA
Dewpoints reached 60° mid afternoon, so there was some juice for t-storms.
#15
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:36 PM
F1 SW of Spring Hill Whiteside 2130 0.3 miles (0.5 km)
#16
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:39 PM
Geos, on 17 February 2012 - 06:05 PM, said:
http://abclocal.go.c...ocal&id=8207678
#17
Posted 17 February 2012 - 06:42 PM
#18
Posted 17 February 2012 - 07:05 PM
cyclone77, on 17 February 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:
Me too. It reminds me of the WIBW weatherman during the 1966 Topeka F5. In his interview he's going on about how it was the most important moment in his career and he knew what he said next was going to make history. Instead of our modern day panic over tornado emergencies and such, he spoke in a monotone and bored voice saying "it's in topeka...for god sakes....take cover."
It's not quite the same...but guess back then presenters had more reserved reactions or so it would seem.
Edited by foster, 17 February 2012 - 07:15 PM.
#19
Posted 17 February 2012 - 07:12 PM
foster, on 17 February 2012 - 07:05 PM, said:
Me too. It reminds me of the WIBW weatherman during the 1966 Topeka F5. In his interview he's going on about how it was the most important moment in his career and he knew what he said next was going to make history. Instead of our modern day panic over tornado emergencies and such, he spoke in a monotone and bored voice saying "it's in topeka...for god sakes....take cover."
It's not quite the same...but guess back then people had more reserved reactions or so it would seem.
Yeah, good point. Definitely was very professional.
#20
Posted 17 February 2012 - 07:13 PM
#21
Posted 17 February 2012 - 07:29 PM
#22
Posted 17 February 2012 - 08:25 PM
#23
Posted 17 February 2012 - 08:44 PM
Thundersnow12, on 17 February 2012 - 08:25 PM, said:
...and this time it might not be through a suburb...
People often think Dallas is the worst case scenario out of the commonly tornado targeted major cities (often due to its geographical location), I'm inclined to think Chicago might be worse, especially during a 6/2/90, 4/24/67 or 4/11/65 type outbreak.
#24
Posted 17 February 2012 - 10:25 PM
#25
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:07 PM
#26
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:38 PM
andyhb, on 17 February 2012 - 08:44 PM, said:
People often think Dallas is the worst case scenario out of the commonly tornado targeted major cities (often due to its geographical location), I'm inclined to think Chicago might be worse, especially during a 6/2/90, 4/24/67 or 4/11/65 type outbreak.
The way I see it, the Dallas/Ft Worth Metroplex is at a somewhat higher likelihood simply due to its geographical location but Chicagoland is the biggest metro area with an enhanced risk of a major tornado disaster. Large metros like Houston, New York City, Philly etc certainly have the population to be concerned about but not the violent tornado history that areas in/around northeast IL have. Fortunately, the truly violent events don't happen very often but with the urban sprawl, a big hit on Cook county is no longer needed to make it a major problem.
#27
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:40 PM
#28
Posted 17 February 2012 - 11:49 PM
#29
Posted 18 February 2012 - 01:08 AM
Also, as of 2010, there are 39 counties in the US with over 1 million people. If we look at those counties and F4/F5 tornado tracks since 1950, there are only 3 other counties that have had 2 violent tornado strikes besides Cook: Cuyahoga county OH, Oakland county MI, and Hennepin county MN. St Louis is tricky since they are an independent city but if we lump them and St Louis county together, that makes 4.
#30
Posted 18 February 2012 - 01:27 AM
#31
Posted 18 February 2012 - 10:16 AM
#32
Posted 18 February 2012 - 12:33 PM
Advertisement
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account
Sign In
Create Account

Back to top
Donator



