Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,575
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    masonj4
    Newest Member
    masonj4
    Joined

Central PA Winter 25/26 Discussion and Obs


MAG5035
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Jns2183 said:

Here's from an infograph I made from the text bulletins of the 19z NBM. specifically regarding snowfall percentile amounts by region file_0000000028ec722f8304499093a234e9.jpg

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk
 

That’s very cool!  The communication of the numerical guidance in one succinct graphic!  Awesome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting excited for my first long duration plow event since ‘21. I have since switched companies and now only have to take care of our shop/storage unit site. Not a lot of places to put the snow, going to have to account for that since we should still have some chances down the road. Won’t be far from @Yardstickgozinya and will try to get some pics in. We have a full kitchen in the shop, thinking about whipping up some potato soup and throwing it in a croc pot for some quick refreshment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone who wants a look at Google's new weather model, meteorologist Eric Fisher has a simple forcast viewer on his github

https://efisher828.github.io/weathernext/


Here's more information on it
https://deepmind.google/science/weathernext/

https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/projects_gcp-public-data-weathernext_assets_weathernext_2_0_0

If anyone has the technical background I believe you can already do a whole lot more

Finally this new endeavor I came across that has a whole lot of potential even though it currently only had temperature and wind verification scores.
https://www.actuallyweather.com/?run_date=2026-01-21

What's neat is it has it by major weather reporting station, like kmdt. The promise is soon we could have scorecards for about 50 variables like snow, and rainfall, along with ability to customize periods. And yes, I understand the scorecards put out by the nws and euro are for much larger areas and maybe even tracking slightly different metrics, but dear God they require hours of study to even interpret probably as the user base for them usually have phD. While I understand that accuracy in temperature or qpf for a single location has the probability of noise being potentially exponentially bigger than the signal, (i.e a model, especially an mL one that continuelly maximizes minute station details may quickly Decoherence at the upper air forcasts that drive accurate forcasting at a greater geospatial scale; in happy that a true effort is finally being made to score at the level we all care bout and spend so much effort discussing.

Sent from my SM-S731U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said:

I think the NBM factors in ratios.

It does, I know reading into the updates of the new version that it mainly applies the Cobb method for snow ratios. I think the current version does to a degree as well, not sure. But the NBM snow maps do factor in variable ratios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...