5/15 severe wx

[largetornado]

Starting a thread on this as the parameter space is fairly impressive with cape values exceeding 3500. looks like there will be an EML present which should keep convection limited and the 500-850 crossovers are favorable for discrete. 

[CheeselandSkies]

Would really need to see the timing of the system slow down (by just about 3 hours) compared to recent GFS solutions to maximize the severe threat in Wisconsin/Illinois Thursday afternoon. Today's SPC outlook notes that is in fact a bias with the model, but it continues to hold consistent with that through the current (06Z) run.

[Stebo]

I am fine with the GFS speed, IL doesn't need to get everything lol.

[A-L-E-K]

this is michigan's moment 

[Stebo]

7 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said:

this is michigan's moment 

Timing on Euro is actually similar, the only thing I don't like is that it could extend into the night time. Don't need night time tornadoes.

[CheeselandSkies]

12Z NAM came in pretty spicy. Again, there are some pattern fundamentals that suggest this one has a better chance of verifying a threat than 4/28, namely a pronounced negative tilt and a potent LLJ with a more southerly component. Still some details yet to iron out which held SPC back from pulling the trigger on a 30% zone.

[sbnwx85]

Sounding just west of South Bend for Thursday evening... Is this worse than posting a 3 foot snow map four days out? 

[andyhb]

Synoptics here are pretty favorable for a significant event including almost all of the sub-forum. Big EML with steep lapse rates, plenty of moisture, a trough that looks to swing negative tilt at a pretty ideal time of the day, and the LLJ responding to that. Will need to watch out how much areas further south mix out especially since convection should probably hold off until later in the day.

Could definitely see the Madison/MKE and Chicago areas get in on this, and perhaps N IN/S MI later on. The pre-frontal wind shift is very obvious on most guidance.

[CheeselandSkies]

3 hours ago, andyhb said:

Synoptics here are pretty favorable for a significant event including almost all of the sub-forum. Big EML with steep lapse rates, plenty of moisture, a trough that looks to swing negative tilt at a pretty ideal time of the day, and the LLJ responding to that. Will need to watch out how much areas further south mix out especially since convection should probably hold off until later in the day.

Could definitely see the Madison/MKE and Chicago areas get in on this, and perhaps N IN/S MI later on. The pre-frontal wind shift is very obvious on most guidance.

Been hoping you would chime in here and/or TW.

[largetornado]

Pretty solid EML showing in the NAM. Holographs are a little wonky (especially eastern fringe of risk area) but if the cap breaks, I could see a moderate risk level ceiling but that is a stout EML for this area. Large destructive hail is definitely in the cards though for anything that develops. LCLS are a tad high as well

[andyhb]

Friday could also be a problem for areas further south into the Ohio and Tennessee Valleys. Shortwaves with zonal flow down there can be quite prolific.

[CheeselandSkies]

Initial Day 3 outlook was surprisingly underwhelming. Gun-shy after the one they put out for April 28? But this setup looks a lot more concerning simply from a trough geometry standpoint.

[Chicago Storm]

Initial Day 3 outlook was surprisingly underwhelming. Gun-shy after the one they put out for April 28? But this setup looks a lot more concerning simply from a trough geometry standpoint.

or it could be just because it just doesn’t look all that great and they actually realize it this time.

[CheeselandSkies]

27 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

or it could be just because it just doesn’t look all that great and they actually realize it this time.

What doesn't look great about it to you? There are some potential failure modes to be sure but I think it checks a lot more boxes than that day did.

*Edit Annnnnd 12Z 3K NAM coming in hot (unlike any of the CAMs at this range for 4/28). Unusual for this model to resolve semi-discrete convection like this. These simulated cells are moving through a strongly unstable and sheared environment. The solution verbatim would also resolve a lot of the timing issues that have been shown on the coarser models (especially the GFS).