Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,646
    Total Members
    14,841
    Most Online
    SENCMike
    Newest Member
    SENCMike
    Joined

2025-2026 ENSO


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, BlizzardWx said:

It would take a pretty sharp reversal to get decent cold anomalies in the plains compared to current guidance for Feb. We are going to be roasting at least first third if not first half of the month, like +10 F above normal if not more for my area. Of course January was like that and we still ended below normal because the last third of the month was so cold. But assuming models trend more favorably after any SSW maybe we still have time.  I don't think it would take much of an eastward shift in the pattern mid month to turn that western trough into GB/Plains trough. 

Yea, we'll see...I certainly don't expect a perfect forecast from 3 months lead.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, so_whats_happening said:

Unfortunately it still looks as though things will be intact through Strato to Tropo. There has been residual high latitude blocking on the Pacific side of the arctic a lot this season which has allowed us to remain relatively cold through many of the months. If we can hold that pattern into the second half of February as things relax yet again I would not be surprised at a similar progression as we saw in January for February. The SPV just does not get demolished like we typically want to see.

Well again we saw something similar to this last year around this time. From about the 3rd week of February to mid March there really was not a whole lot that took place. I want to say there was a quick snowfall that snuck in but this was the overall pattern at 500mb after the event took place. The graphs below show a funky wave 2 tried to set up but ultimately ended up being a wave 1 event and tiny lobe was over Greenland for a bit. Similar things don't always produce the same event but I wouldn't expect much out of this if we go down that path.compday.pzldhZf1x_.gif.b39e67dc19069bdd3edeba2a6d05228b.gif

That is actually fairly typical in split events (if the split event were to occur) the larger more intact lobe goes to Eurasia while a piece splits off to our side. It is the lack of a true split that leads to almost being another wave 1 displacement event again fairly similar to last year at this time.

This was what the Euro and GFS had leading up to the event. I wish I had saved the later portion but I guess I deleted stuff.

gfs_Tz10_nhem_fh0-384.thumb.gif.10e3c02c4ae705db724e46b2442c725c.gif9-kmECMWFStratosphereNorthernHemisphere10hPaGeopotentialHeightAnomaly.gif.eb8eec66783b7fcbd28551e08776019a.gif.d5257c6b63635a7ec4cf04bd2e75c385.gif

All this to say I do want to go out with a bang for the season but my hopes are slowly fading like the winter season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, so_whats_happening said:

Unfortunately it still looks as though things will be intact through Strato to Tropo. There has been residual high latitude blocking on the Pacific side of the arctic a lot this season which has allowed us to remain relatively cold through many of the months. If we can hold that pattern into the second half of February as things relax yet again I would not be surprised at a similar progression as we saw in January for February. The SPV just does not get demolished like we typically want to see.

Well again we saw something similar to this last year around this time. From about the 3rd week of February to mid March there really was not a whole lot that took place. I want to say there was a quick snowfall that snuck in but this was the overall pattern at 500mb after the event took place. The graphs below show a funky wave 2 tried to set up but ultimately ended up being a wave 1 event and tiny lobe was over Greenland for a bit. Similar things don't always produce the same event but I wouldn't expect much out of this if we go down that path.compday.pzldhZf1x_.gif.b39e67dc19069bdd3edeba2a6d05228b.gif

That is actually fairly typical in split events (if the split event were to occur) the larger more intact lobe goes to Eurasia while a piece splits off to our side. It is the lack of a true split that leads to almost being another wave 1 displacement event again fairly similar to last year at this time.

This was what the Euro and GFS had leading up to the event. I wish I had saved the later portion but I guess I deleted stuff.

gfs_Tz10_nhem_fh0-384.thumb.gif.10e3c02c4ae705db724e46b2442c725c.gif9-kmECMWFStratosphereNorthernHemisphere10hPaGeopotentialHeightAnomaly.gif.eb8eec66783b7fcbd28551e08776019a.gif.d5257c6b63635a7ec4cf04bd2e75c385.gif

Pretty close to a full split.....I would wait to see what actually verified because I still anticipate a full split, more akin to 2018 and 2023.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Pretty close to a full split.....I would wait to see what actually verified because I still anticipate a full split, more akin to 2018 and 2023.

Vortex stretching is the term but Im still not seeing a split take hold even with the Euro to 240. It took roughly 30 days to translate to the surface in 2018 (split occurred around the first few days of February) leading to the snowfall events around presidents day and into March. Much different outlook this go around.

ecmwf10f240.png

ecmwf50f240.png

ecmwf150f240.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, so_whats_happening said:

Vortex stretching is the term but Im still not seeing a split take hold even with the Euro to 240. It took roughly 30 days to translate to the surface in 2018 (split occurred around the first few days of February) leading to the snowfall events around presidents day and into March. Much different outlook this go around.

ecmwf10f240.png

ecmwf50f240.png

ecmwf150f240.png

I'm not arguing with your interpretation of what guidance shows now, rather I'm arguing that it's still adjusting and not there yet. Wouldn't be the first time.

AVvXsEgL8EMw1ukNQcIQ1d_e3cfHFd4HfxHXKD3ABNNz3HXIb7taGdzWxgdmI9u6yW8UF0fXLeLqioO02-sE5DbZKX55ynrWXrCpa49OtcGplyT7qcYAE9yh7QLCEmFF7nxOyNCTRVlsssSHWZnN9KFmXvjpictF1ZoDBV6jB7j9vCghWwC-ay-3kZ025sUxeZo=w640-h462AVvXsEgup8akb97sSbBmuSndBCFkXpOU_nXtT8T2YCZEmBLSrAyEopqeWQESfC1m59krAV9T7iLEOl9UJJCYewj8b-mW69CoMXO4IxaTur-l-4fs_Xfmv6VS0OFRwRS1Cd8n57dpR8aJExWW7T2xuMuob4HiNcEYsH318XP81iEoPhb1mcgU0FVttiFEFMvfP-M=w640-h456

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guidance was originally insistent that the RNA pattern from the month of December would persist throughout the vast majority of the month of January, with the exception of a brief interval of PNA flex the second week of the month (10th-15th).
 
AVvXsEifzABxqrFh6hxIvQ9hK7DhR1PRdlp1Kr2S
The above annotation ultimately proved correct in asserting that the forecast return of RNA after mid-month, as suggested by guidance, was in fact erroneous.
 
AVvXsEjb0o5yLlQOGIQanJANONbagPSUAg15ZmTZ
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to burst the meme bubble ... but until that registers in the models as successfully to and thru the 100 mb level, it's unclear (likely not) that there's destined to be a wholesale sigma coupling that eventually/really involves the troposphere.   That may yet happen, but support for that is very vague for the time being. 

300 hour GFS from recency does shows up heights height response over the Alaska sector, so we may just need to bide time

image.thumb.png.342d90c589bb2c3a06adead5f0bdd22b.png

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

Not trying to burst the meme bubble ... but until that registers in the models as successfully to and thru the 100 mb level, it's unclear (likely not) that there's destined to be a wholesale sigma coupling that eventually/really involves the troposphere.   That may yet happen, but that support for that is very vague for the time being. 

300 hour GFS from recency does shows up heights height response over the Alaska sector, so we may just need to bide time

image.thumb.png.342d90c589bb2c3a06adead5f0bdd22b.png

 

 

Exactly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Not trying to burst the meme bubble ... but until that registers in the models as successfully to and thru the 100 mb level, it's unclear (likely not) that there's destined to be a wholesale sigma coupling that eventually/really involves the troposphere.   That may yet happen, but support for that is very vague for the time being. 

300 hour GFS from recency does shows up heights height response over the Alaska sector, so we may just need to bide time

image.thumb.png.342d90c589bb2c3a06adead5f0bdd22b.png

 

 

Honestly we haven't really needed much influence from the strat this year other than it maintaining at or below average in strength most of the season. i'd rather have the 500mb take the lead but it would have been nice to lock it in with an actual split.

I will not be looking forward to a below average March and April if one were to occur this late in the season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2026 at 12:36 AM, snowfan789 said:

Significant portions of the West are record warm and snowless to date for this winter season. It is not unreasonable to describe that as a bigger weather and perhaps climate story than a somewhat cold and somewhat snowy winter in some parts of the approximately eastern third of the country only that is for the most part not record breaking. If you only care about the weather in your own backyard, cool. But if you’re genuinely interested in the weather and climate, then the superlative status of the winter in much of the West presumably would be something you’d deem worthy of attention. It is a major weather-related issue at the present with real and lasting repercussions for the environment and economy in a large portion of the country.

The magnitude of the warmth in the West has been much more extreme than magnitude of the cold in the East.

So the West has been experiencing historic warmth.

While the East has been colder than recent winters, it’s nothing historic compared to our colder winters of the past. 

 

How cold has this winter been so far? The first 2/3 of winter 2025-26 is the 7th warmest on record for the Contiguous U.S.
bafkreiayh3kok3n3tagx2blhq4uzlhwnvidj5hy
 
10:22 PM · Feb 1, 2026
 
 
Here is how all areas ranked from 1 (warmest) to 131 (coolest). Team Red is WAY BIGGER than Team Blue.
bafkreiexezalvw2ygeucji3b5jyhhcgmlm3yt5f
 
 
9
 
 
 


 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, so_whats_happening said:

Honestly we haven't really needed much influence from the strat this year other than it maintaining at or below average in strength most of the season. i'd rather have the 500mb take the lead but it would have been nice to lock it in with an actual split.

I will not be looking forward to a below average March and April if one were to occur this late in the season.

Agreed ... this brings up another point for me ... Ray and others may know this but, in an ongoing raging -AO winter, which this

image.png.02f05d1d6d46b9a731bb4311896fbb1e.png

...might qualify - objectively we'll have to see if that ending +d(AO) is real or not but it would predate any SSW time-lag coupling enough that a positive AO period could temporally fit prior to the forcing being realized.   Otherwise, the advent of an SSW and actual downward propagation - a prerequisite requirement in the correlation - may not mean anything to a season already heavily downtrodden and cooler than normal resulting.   

Yeah, protracted wet snow on mud winter is not subjectively preferred. LOL.  For me personally...would rather that positive AO above herald in a different sort of seasonal relay.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The magnitude of the warmth in the West has been much more extreme than magnitude of the cold in the East. So the West has been experiencing historic warmth. While the East has been colder than recent winters, it’s nothing historic compared to our older winters of the past. 

 

How cold has this winter been so far? The first 2/3 of winter 2025-26 is the 7th warmest on record for the Contiguous U.S.
bafkreiayh3kok3n3tagx2blhq4uzlhwnvidj5hy
 
10:22 PM · Feb 1, 2026
 
 
Here is how all areas ranked from 1 (warmest) to 131 (coolest). Team Red is WAY BIGGER than Team Blue.
bafkreiexezalvw2ygeucji3b5jyhhcgmlm3yt5f
 
 
9
 
 
 


 

 

It's wild how winter never even got started in the west this year. That's the real story, but I believe media blackout is forcing coverage of the relatively cold conditions in the east. And even with our cold winter in the eastern third of the US, snowfall has not been as epic as 2000s and 2010s during similar cold periods because of a fast pacific flow relating to continuous warm SST anomalies in the North Pacific. The warmth is the real story here 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The magnitude of the warmth in the West has been much more extreme than magnitude of the cold in the East.

So the West has been experiencing historic warmth.

While the East has been colder than recent winters, it’s nothing historic compared to our colder winters of the past. 

 

How cold has this winter been so far? The first 2/3 of winter 2025-26 is the 7th warmest on record for the Contiguous U.S.
bafkreiayh3kok3n3tagx2blhq4uzlhwnvidj5hy
 
10:22 PM · Feb 1, 2026
 
 
Here is how all areas ranked from 1 (warmest) to 131 (coolest). Team Red is WAY BIGGER than Team Blue.
bafkreiexezalvw2ygeucji3b5jyhhcgmlm3yt5f
 
 
9
 
 
 


 

 

You can really see how that California tule fog or whatever they were calling it screwed us out of an even warmer December & January.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bluewave said:

The magnitude of the warmth in the West has been much more extreme than magnitude of the cold in the East. So the West has been experiencing historic warmth. While the East has been colder than recent winters, it’s nothing historic compared to our older winters of the past. 

 

How cold has this winter been so far? The first 2/3 of winter 2025-26 is the 7th warmest on record for the Contiguous U.S.
bafkreiayh3kok3n3tagx2blhq4uzlhwnvidj5hy
 
10:22 PM · Feb 1, 2026
 
 
Here is how all areas ranked from 1 (warmest) to 131 (coolest). Team Red is WAY BIGGER than Team Blue.
bafkreiexezalvw2ygeucji3b5jyhhcgmlm3yt5f
 
 
9
 
 
 


 

 

 Thanks, Chris!

1. Indeed, it’s been such a warm DJ in the W 1/2! Thus, geographically as you showed, that makes it 7th warmest for the contiguous US going back 131 years. 

 2. But based strictly on population weighting or gas heating weighting, which are great measures of energy usage for heating, I’m sure you know it hasn’t been warm at all as it has been ~1F BN in the lower 48 thanks to the heavy pop. weighting of the E Midwest/Great Lakes to Mid-Atlantic/NE’s ~5BN easily outweighing the much more sparsely populated W 1/3 of the US’ ~6 AN.

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/degree_days/hfstwpws.txt

 

3. Related to projected upcoming energy usage: yesterday’s natural gas price plunged an historic 25.7%, by far the most in one day since it started trading in 1990!! This was mainly due to the much warmer models in the E US yesterday going out ~3 weeks vs how they looked on Friday, the prior trading day. Was it way overdone in relation to progged demand drop? Of course it was!

 

 Here are the largest NG drops in one trading day since 1990:

-25.7% 2/2/2026

-19.1% 3/18/2004

-17.5% 11/15/2018

-17.0% 6/30/2022

-16.7% 6/14/2022

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, NyWxGuy said:

It's wild how winter never even got started in the west this year. That's the real story, but I believe media blackout is forcing coverage of the relatively cold conditions in the east. And even with our cold winter in the eastern third of the US, snowfall has not been as epic as 2000s and 2010s during similar cold periods because of a fast pacific flow relating to continuous warm SST anomalies in the North Pacific. The warmth is the real story here 

The most impressive short term cold this winter in the CONUS has been the record breaking cold in Florida the last few days. This goes to my point a few days ago about the big temperature swings and smaller geographic footprint of the cold.

So places like West Palm Beach with a very long period of record just tied their all-time warmest winter reading of 90° in late January before falling to their 6th coldest winter low of 30°.

This is against the backdrop of that area and all the locations across the CONUS experiencing a much higher ratio of record highs to record lows. It makes the cold stand out more since it’s more of a novelty than the record warmth which usually dominates

West Palm Beach was finally able to end their longest streak above 30° since 1989. 

Time Series Summary for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb Warmest Temperatures
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 2025-2026 90 26
- 2022-2023 90 0
- 2009-2010 90 0
- 1948-1949 90 0
- 1941-1942 90 0
- 1927-1928 90 0
- 1917-1918 90 0

 

Time Series Summary for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb Coldest Temperatures 
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 1894-1895 24 0
2 1904-1905 26 0
3 1976-1977 27 0
4 1989-1990 28 0
- 1984-1985 28 0
- 1920-1921 28 5
- 1916-1917 28 0
- 1898-1899 28 0
5 1981-1982 29 0
- 1969-1970 29 0
- 1917-1918 29 0
6 2025-2026 30 26
- 1983-1984 30 0
- 1970-1971 30 0
- 1962-1963 30 0
- 1906-1907 30 0
Number of Consecutive Days Min Temperature >= 31 
for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx)
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Period of record: 1888-04-16 to 2026-02-02
1 13186 1989-12-26 through 2026-01-31
2 6787 1944-05-14 through 1962-12-12
3 3893 1929-09-29 through 1940-05-26
4 2584 1962-12-14 through 1970-01-09
5 2190 1971-01-21 through 1977-01-18
6 1796 1985-01-23 through 1989-12-23
7 1658 1899-02-15 through 1903-08-31
8 1413 1940-06-28 through 1944-05-10
9 1137 1977-01-21 through 1980-03-02
10 974 1889-07-01 through 1892-02-29

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The most impressive short term cold this winter in the CONUS has been the record breaking cold in Florida the last few days. This goes to my point a few days ago about the big temperature swings and smaller geographic footprint of the cold.

So places like West Palm Beach with a very long period of record just tied their all-time warmest winter reading of 90° in late January before falling to their 6th coldest winter low of 30°.

This is against the backdrop of that area and all the locations across the CONUS experiencing a much higher ratio of record highs to record lows. It makes the cold stand out more since it’s more of a novelty than the record warmth which usually dominates

West Palm Beach was finally able to end their longest streak above 30° since 1989. 

Time Series Summary for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb Warmest Temperatures
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 2025-2026 90 26
- 2022-2023 90 0
- 2009-2010 90 0
- 1948-1949 90 0
- 1941-1942 90 0
- 1927-1928 90 0
- 1917-1918 90 0

 

Time Series Summary for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx) - Dec through Feb Coldest Temperatures 
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
1 1894-1895 24 0
2 1904-1905 26 0
3 1976-1977 27 0
4 1989-1990 28 0
- 1984-1985 28 0
- 1920-1921 28 5
- 1916-1917 28 0
- 1898-1899 28 0
5 1981-1982 29 0
- 1969-1970 29 0
- 1917-1918 29 0
6 2025-2026 30 26
- 1983-1984 30 0
- 1970-1971 30 0
- 1962-1963 30 0
- 1906-1907 30 0
Number of Consecutive Days Min Temperature >= 31 
for West Palm Beach Area, FL (ThreadEx)
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Period of record: 1888-04-16 to 2026-02-02
1 13186 1989-12-26 through 2026-01-31
2 6787 1944-05-14 through 1962-12-12
3 3893 1929-09-29 through 1940-05-26
4 2584 1962-12-14 through 1970-01-09
5 2190 1971-01-21 through 1977-01-18
6 1796 1985-01-23 through 1989-12-23
7 1658 1899-02-15 through 1903-08-31
8 1413 1940-06-28 through 1944-05-10
9 1137 1977-01-21 through 1980-03-02
10 974 1889-07-01 through 1892-02-29

 

 

Very impressive. Do you think this will be the coldest outbreak of the 21st century in Florida?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, we'll see...I certainly don't expect a perfect forecast from 3 months lead.

And nobody expects perfection! You did a great job this year. I'm really hoping your success keeps going because it would mean we are not done yet. 

  • Like 3
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The forecast failures are the most valuable tool...I've had plenty and they are very educational. 

Even if the stratosphere doesn’t work out this month you have nothing to be upset about. You did a great job since November and were extremely accurate up to this point in time. If it doesn’t work out then oh well, you got the last 3+ months right

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jan ‘26 30 mb QBO came in at -25.51, Jan’s 2nd lowest on record to only 2015’s -26.7:

https://psl.noaa.gov/data/correlation/qbo.data

 Based on the patterns since 1948, there’s a very high chance (I’d say 95%) that it will be positive by next winter, and there’s a better then even chance for the next +QBO period to even start by late summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...