Occasional Thoughts on Climate Change

[TheClimateChanger]

16 minutes ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Sorry, I don't have time to write my own posts. And ChatGPT headlines get far more engagement than any I could create.

 

27 minutes ago, Cobalt said:

You are very committed to discussing all facets of climate change, and I admire your effort. However, would you possibly be up for moving away from AI usage in your posts? I can't help but see all the hallmarks of it throughout your Twitter page. A lot of it undermines your overall message, and I'm not talking from the energy consumption standpoint, but instead just the overall strength of the rhetoric you and consequently ChatGPT use. 

Don't get me wrong, though - I get where you are coming from. But I'm just doing this as a hobby and competing against a steady stream of dis- and misinformation. There are accounts that are actually PAID big bucks just to spread climate disinformation. For an unpaid hobbyist to compete against a career liars, AI is an absolute must.

[WolfStock1]

Wait - so we're basically having discussion with AI, with TCC as a proxy?

No thanks.

Can we perhaps start a separate "No AI" thread?

[Cobalt]

2 hours ago, TheClimateChanger said:

Sorry, I don't have time to write my own posts. And ChatGPT headlines get far more engagement than any I could create.

This is simply not true. ChatGPT is a far worse science communicator than many out there. Its writing habits are also quite predictable, to a point where a still substantial portion of the general public can sense that the vibes are “off” and stop interfacing with the posts entirely.

 

My suggestion would be to narrow the scope of your content and try writing headlines more gripping and information-rich than what ChatGPT can do. It is very much possible, and the reward is that, with enough effort, your unique posts have potential to reach further than 4x the amount of derivative AI posts would be capable of. I guarantee it.